Efbemalenograstim alfa as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase II trial.

IF 12.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Mengjie Li, Caixia Liu, Fengming Ran, Haitao Lan, Jun Ge, Zheng Zhao, Chuangzhou Rao, Wei Zheng, Xiaoyong Tang, Tianhui Gao, Yong Mao, Wei Cui, Zhengguo Li, Dingzhi Huang
{"title":"Efbemalenograstim alfa as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase II trial.","authors":"Mengjie Li, Caixia Liu, Fengming Ran, Haitao Lan, Jun Ge, Zheng Zhao, Chuangzhou Rao, Wei Zheng, Xiaoyong Tang, Tianhui Gao, Yong Mao, Wei Cui, Zhengguo Li, Dingzhi Huang","doi":"10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2026.0311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is recommended for patients receiving chemotherapy with a high risk of febrile neutropenia (FN), but its use remains suboptimal in patients receiving intermediate-risk regimens who have additional risk factors, for whom secondary prophylaxis (SPx) is commonly used despite limited prospective evidence comparing the two approaches. This study evaluated efbemalenograstim alfa (EFBGα), a novel Fc fusion G-CSF, as primary or secondary prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving intermediate-risk FN regimens who have additional risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, randomized phase II trial enrolled chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC scheduled for platinum-taxane chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 2:1 to either primary prophylaxis (EFBGα 20 mg at 48 ± 4 h after each cycle) or secondary prophylaxis (given only after grade 3-4 neutropenia). The primary endpoint was the cycle 1 incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 patients were enrolled between February 2024 and December 2025, of whom 96 were included in the analysis: 63 in the primary prophylaxis group and 33 in the secondary prophylaxis group. In cycle 1, the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was lower with primary prophylaxis than with secondary prophylaxis [20.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.5%-32.7% <i>vs.</i> 57.6%, 95% CI 39.2%-74.5%; risk difference -36.9%, 95% CI -52.4% to -16.1%; <i>P</i> < 0.001]. The median duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia was comparable between the groups (<i>P</i> = 0.144). Cycle 1 FN incidence was 1.6% in the primary and 6.1% in the secondary prophylaxis group. Treatment-related adverse events were mostly grade 1-2, with pain-related events (7.0%) being the most common.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EFBGα exhibited promising efficacy and tolerability for CIN prophylaxis in patients with NSCLC and additional risk factors who are receiving intermediate-risk chemotherapy (IRC). The results support its use in both primary and secondary prophylactic strategies, and earlier initiation was associated with better CIN control.</p>","PeriodicalId":9611,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Biology & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Biology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2026.0311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is recommended for patients receiving chemotherapy with a high risk of febrile neutropenia (FN), but its use remains suboptimal in patients receiving intermediate-risk regimens who have additional risk factors, for whom secondary prophylaxis (SPx) is commonly used despite limited prospective evidence comparing the two approaches. This study evaluated efbemalenograstim alfa (EFBGα), a novel Fc fusion G-CSF, as primary or secondary prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving intermediate-risk FN regimens who have additional risk factors.

Methods: This multicenter, randomized phase II trial enrolled chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC scheduled for platinum-taxane chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 2:1 to either primary prophylaxis (EFBGα 20 mg at 48 ± 4 h after each cycle) or secondary prophylaxis (given only after grade 3-4 neutropenia). The primary endpoint was the cycle 1 incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia.

Results: A total of 102 patients were enrolled between February 2024 and December 2025, of whom 96 were included in the analysis: 63 in the primary prophylaxis group and 33 in the secondary prophylaxis group. In cycle 1, the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was lower with primary prophylaxis than with secondary prophylaxis [20.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.5%-32.7% vs. 57.6%, 95% CI 39.2%-74.5%; risk difference -36.9%, 95% CI -52.4% to -16.1%; P < 0.001]. The median duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia was comparable between the groups (P = 0.144). Cycle 1 FN incidence was 1.6% in the primary and 6.1% in the secondary prophylaxis group. Treatment-related adverse events were mostly grade 1-2, with pain-related events (7.0%) being the most common.

Conclusions: EFBGα exhibited promising efficacy and tolerability for CIN prophylaxis in patients with NSCLC and additional risk factors who are receiving intermediate-risk chemotherapy (IRC). The results support its use in both primary and secondary prophylactic strategies, and earlier initiation was associated with better CIN control.

Efbemalenograstim预防非小细胞肺癌患者化疗诱导的中性粒细胞减少:一项随机、多中心、II期试验
目的:粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的初级预防被推荐用于接受化疗的发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)高风险的患者,但对于接受中等风险方案且有其他危险因素的患者,其使用仍然是次优的,尽管比较两种方法的前瞻性证据有限,二级预防(SPx)通常被使用。本研究评估了efbmalengrastim alfa (EFBGα),一种新型Fc融合G-CSF,作为化疗诱导的中性粒细胞减少(CIN)的初级或二级预防药物,用于接受具有其他危险因素的中等风险FN方案的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者。方法:这项多中心、随机II期试验招募了chemotherapy-naïve计划接受铂-紫杉烷化疗的IIIB/IV期NSCLC患者。患者按2:1随机分配至一级预防(efbg - α 20 mg,每个周期后48±4小时)或二级预防(仅在3-4级中性粒细胞减少后给予)。主要终点是第1周期3-4级中性粒细胞减少的发生率。结果:2024年2月至2025年12月共纳入102例患者,其中96例纳入分析,其中63例为一级预防组,33例为二级预防组。在第1周期,初级预防的3-4级中性粒细胞减少发生率低于二级预防[20.6%,95%可信区间(CI) 11.5%-32.7% vs. 57.6%, 95% CI 39.2%-74.5%;风险差-36.9%,95% CI -52.4% ~ -16.1%;P < 0.001]。3-4级中性粒细胞减少的中位持续时间在两组之间具有可比性(P = 0.144)。第一周期FN发病率在初级预防组为1.6%,在二级预防组为6.1%。治疗相关不良事件主要为1-2级,其中疼痛相关事件最常见(7.0%)。结论:EFBGα在接受中危化疗(IRC)的非小细胞肺癌和其他危险因素患者中显示出良好的CIN预防疗效和耐受性。结果支持其用于一级和二级预防策略,并且早期开始与更好的CIN控制相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Cancer Biology & Medicine Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
1143
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Biology & Medicine (ISSN 2095-3941) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal of Chinese Anti-cancer Association (CACA), which is the leading professional society of oncology in China. The journal quarterly provides innovative and significant information on biological basis of cancer, cancer microenvironment, translational cancer research, and all aspects of clinical cancer research. The journal also publishes significant perspectives on indigenous cancer types in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书