Efbemalenograstim alfa as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase II trial.
{"title":"Efbemalenograstim alfa as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase II trial.","authors":"Mengjie Li, Caixia Liu, Fengming Ran, Haitao Lan, Jun Ge, Zheng Zhao, Chuangzhou Rao, Wei Zheng, Xiaoyong Tang, Tianhui Gao, Yong Mao, Wei Cui, Zhengguo Li, Dingzhi Huang","doi":"10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2026.0311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is recommended for patients receiving chemotherapy with a high risk of febrile neutropenia (FN), but its use remains suboptimal in patients receiving intermediate-risk regimens who have additional risk factors, for whom secondary prophylaxis (SPx) is commonly used despite limited prospective evidence comparing the two approaches. This study evaluated efbemalenograstim alfa (EFBGα), a novel Fc fusion G-CSF, as primary or secondary prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving intermediate-risk FN regimens who have additional risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, randomized phase II trial enrolled chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC scheduled for platinum-taxane chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 2:1 to either primary prophylaxis (EFBGα 20 mg at 48 ± 4 h after each cycle) or secondary prophylaxis (given only after grade 3-4 neutropenia). The primary endpoint was the cycle 1 incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 patients were enrolled between February 2024 and December 2025, of whom 96 were included in the analysis: 63 in the primary prophylaxis group and 33 in the secondary prophylaxis group. In cycle 1, the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was lower with primary prophylaxis than with secondary prophylaxis [20.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.5%-32.7% <i>vs.</i> 57.6%, 95% CI 39.2%-74.5%; risk difference -36.9%, 95% CI -52.4% to -16.1%; <i>P</i> < 0.001]. The median duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia was comparable between the groups (<i>P</i> = 0.144). Cycle 1 FN incidence was 1.6% in the primary and 6.1% in the secondary prophylaxis group. Treatment-related adverse events were mostly grade 1-2, with pain-related events (7.0%) being the most common.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EFBGα exhibited promising efficacy and tolerability for CIN prophylaxis in patients with NSCLC and additional risk factors who are receiving intermediate-risk chemotherapy (IRC). The results support its use in both primary and secondary prophylactic strategies, and earlier initiation was associated with better CIN control.</p>","PeriodicalId":9611,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Biology & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Biology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2026.0311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is recommended for patients receiving chemotherapy with a high risk of febrile neutropenia (FN), but its use remains suboptimal in patients receiving intermediate-risk regimens who have additional risk factors, for whom secondary prophylaxis (SPx) is commonly used despite limited prospective evidence comparing the two approaches. This study evaluated efbemalenograstim alfa (EFBGα), a novel Fc fusion G-CSF, as primary or secondary prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving intermediate-risk FN regimens who have additional risk factors.
Methods: This multicenter, randomized phase II trial enrolled chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC scheduled for platinum-taxane chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 2:1 to either primary prophylaxis (EFBGα 20 mg at 48 ± 4 h after each cycle) or secondary prophylaxis (given only after grade 3-4 neutropenia). The primary endpoint was the cycle 1 incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia.
Results: A total of 102 patients were enrolled between February 2024 and December 2025, of whom 96 were included in the analysis: 63 in the primary prophylaxis group and 33 in the secondary prophylaxis group. In cycle 1, the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was lower with primary prophylaxis than with secondary prophylaxis [20.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.5%-32.7% vs. 57.6%, 95% CI 39.2%-74.5%; risk difference -36.9%, 95% CI -52.4% to -16.1%; P < 0.001]. The median duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia was comparable between the groups (P = 0.144). Cycle 1 FN incidence was 1.6% in the primary and 6.1% in the secondary prophylaxis group. Treatment-related adverse events were mostly grade 1-2, with pain-related events (7.0%) being the most common.
Conclusions: EFBGα exhibited promising efficacy and tolerability for CIN prophylaxis in patients with NSCLC and additional risk factors who are receiving intermediate-risk chemotherapy (IRC). The results support its use in both primary and secondary prophylactic strategies, and earlier initiation was associated with better CIN control.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Biology & Medicine (ISSN 2095-3941) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal of Chinese Anti-cancer Association (CACA), which is the leading professional society of oncology in China. The journal quarterly provides innovative and significant information on biological basis of cancer, cancer microenvironment, translational cancer research, and all aspects of clinical cancer research. The journal also publishes significant perspectives on indigenous cancer types in China.