Is It Time to Pay Attention to Right and Left Ventricular Apical Angles as Clinically Relevant Computed Tomography Measures in Acute Pulmonary Embolism?

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Barkın Kültürsay, Cihangir Kaymaz, Yiğit Cengiz Erkuş, Bahadir Erdem Öcal, Seda Tanyeri Üzel, Hacer Ceren Tokgöz, Çağlar Emre Çağlıyan, Berhan Keskin, Çağdaş Buluş, Doğan Şen, İpek Akkuş, Azmican Kaya, Oğuz Dönmez, Ömer Doğukan Ertan, Muhammet Bulut, Aykun Hakgör, Şeyhmus Külahçıoğlu, Nihal Özdemir
{"title":"Is It Time to Pay Attention to Right and Left Ventricular Apical Angles as Clinically Relevant Computed Tomography Measures in Acute Pulmonary Embolism?","authors":"Barkın Kültürsay, Cihangir Kaymaz, Yiğit Cengiz Erkuş, Bahadir Erdem Öcal, Seda Tanyeri Üzel, Hacer Ceren Tokgöz, Çağlar Emre Çağlıyan, Berhan Keskin, Çağdaş Buluş, Doğan Şen, İpek Akkuş, Azmican Kaya, Oğuz Dönmez, Ömer Doğukan Ertan, Muhammet Bulut, Aykun Hakgör, Şeyhmus Külahçıoğlu, Nihal Özdemir","doi":"10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2026.6458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In acute pulmonary embolism (PE), abrupt right ventricular (RV) pressure overload and ventricular interdependence are primary determinants of hemodynamic deterioration and short-term mortality. Conventional computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) markers, such as the RV/left ventricular (LV) diameter ratio, exhibit variable prognostic performance and may not fully capture early geometric remodeling. It was hypothesized that CTPA-derived apical angle metrics, reflecting biventricular geometric distortion, provide complementary prognostic information beyond established clinical scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study of 535 consecutive patients with acute PE, novel CTPA-derived apical geometry metrics were evaluated: the RV apical angle (α1), the LV apical angle (α2), and their ratio (α1/ α2). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; long-term all-cause mortality served as the secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher α1 and α1/α₂ values were significantly associated with greater pulmonary arterial obstruction, severe RV dysfunction, and higher clinical risk status. In-hospital mortality increased significantly across α1 tertiles (P = .017). In multiple logistic regression models, after adjustment for the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score and the conventional RV/LV diameter ratio, both α1 and α1/α₂ remained independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Adding these apical metrics to the PESI-based baseline model significantly improved prognostic accuracy, demonstrating substantial incremental value for short-term risk stratification. Mortality risk increased linearly beyond thresholds of α1>32.5° and α1/α₂ > 1.17. In multiple Cox proportional hazards analysis, no imaging-derived parameter independently predicted long-term mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography-derived apical angle metrics provide physiologically meaningful, continuous measures of acute RV geometric remodeling in acute PE. These metrics offer significant incremental prognostic value for in-hospital mortality beyond the PESI score and conventional CT markers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7835,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2026.6458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In acute pulmonary embolism (PE), abrupt right ventricular (RV) pressure overload and ventricular interdependence are primary determinants of hemodynamic deterioration and short-term mortality. Conventional computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) markers, such as the RV/left ventricular (LV) diameter ratio, exhibit variable prognostic performance and may not fully capture early geometric remodeling. It was hypothesized that CTPA-derived apical angle metrics, reflecting biventricular geometric distortion, provide complementary prognostic information beyond established clinical scores.

Methods: In this retrospective study of 535 consecutive patients with acute PE, novel CTPA-derived apical geometry metrics were evaluated: the RV apical angle (α1), the LV apical angle (α2), and their ratio (α1/ α2). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; long-term all-cause mortality served as the secondary outcome.

Results: Higher α1 and α1/α₂ values were significantly associated with greater pulmonary arterial obstruction, severe RV dysfunction, and higher clinical risk status. In-hospital mortality increased significantly across α1 tertiles (P = .017). In multiple logistic regression models, after adjustment for the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score and the conventional RV/LV diameter ratio, both α1 and α1/α₂ remained independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Adding these apical metrics to the PESI-based baseline model significantly improved prognostic accuracy, demonstrating substantial incremental value for short-term risk stratification. Mortality risk increased linearly beyond thresholds of α1>32.5° and α1/α₂ > 1.17. In multiple Cox proportional hazards analysis, no imaging-derived parameter independently predicted long-term mortality.

Conclusions: Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography-derived apical angle metrics provide physiologically meaningful, continuous measures of acute RV geometric remodeling in acute PE. These metrics offer significant incremental prognostic value for in-hospital mortality beyond the PESI score and conventional CT markers.

是时候关注左右心室尖角作为急性肺栓塞的临床相关计算机断层扫描措施了吗?
背景:在急性肺栓塞(PE)中,突然的右心室(RV)压力过载和心室相互依赖是血流动力学恶化和短期死亡的主要决定因素。传统的计算机断层肺血管造影(CTPA)标志物,如左室/左室(LV)直径比,表现出不同的预后表现,可能不能完全捕捉早期几何重构。假设ctpa衍生的心尖角指标反映了双心室几何畸变,提供了超出既定临床评分的补充预后信息。方法:对535例急性肺心病患者进行回顾性研究,评估新型ctpa衍生的心尖几何指标:左室心尖角(α1)、左室心尖角(α2)及其比值(α1/ α2)。主要结局是住院死亡率;长期全因死亡率作为次要结局。结果:α1和α1/α 2值越高,肺动脉阻塞程度越严重,右心室功能障碍越严重,临床危险状态越高。各α1分位数的住院死亡率显著增加(P = 0.017)。在多元logistic回归模型中,在调整肺栓塞严重程度指数(PESI)评分和常规左室/左室直径比后,α1和α1/α 2仍与住院死亡率独立相关。将这些顶点指标添加到基于pesi的基线模型中,显著提高了预后准确性,显示出短期风险分层的显著增量价值。死亡风险线性增加,超过α1>32.5°和α1/α 2 > 1.17。在多重Cox比例风险分析中,没有成像衍生参数独立预测长期死亡率。结论:计算机层析肺血管造影衍生的根尖角指标为急性肺动脉栓塞的急性右心室几何重构提供了有生理学意义的连续测量。这些指标对院内死亡率的预测价值显著高于PESI评分和传统CT标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
270
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology is an international monthly periodical on cardiology published on independent, unbiased, double-blinded and peer-review principles. The journal’s publication language is English. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology aims to publish qualified and original clinical, experimental and basic research on cardiology at the international level. The journal’s scope also covers editorial comments, reviews of innovations in medical education and practice, case reports, original images, scientific letters, educational articles, letters to the editor, articles on publication ethics, diagnostic puzzles, and issues in social cardiology. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents, and general practitioners working in the fields of adult cardiology, pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery and internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书