Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Psychiatric Practice: An Overlooked, Treatable Comorbidity

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-22 DOI:10.1111/acps.70140
Seiji Nishino
{"title":"Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Psychiatric Practice: An Overlooked, Treatable Comorbidity","authors":"Seiji Nishino","doi":"10.1111/acps.70140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a sleep-related breathing disorder characterized by recurrent upper-airway obstruction during sleep, resulting in apnea or hypopnea, intermittent hypoxemia, sleep fragmentation, and fluctuations in intrathoracic pressure. OSA is highly prevalent in the general population; when mild disease is included, it is estimated to affect approximately 9%–38% of adults [<span>1</span>]. Common manifestations include habitual snoring, witnessed apneas, gasping or choking during sleep, nocturia, morning headache, dry mouth, excessive daytime sleepiness, fatigue, impaired concentration, and non-restorative sleep.</p><p>Untreated OSA is associated with hypertension, atrial fibrillation, stroke, coronary artery disease, metabolic abnormalities, obesity, accident risk, and cognitive impairment [<span>2-4</span>]. Intermittent hypoxia, sleep fragmentation, sympathetic activation, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses have all been implicated in the cardiovascular and metabolic consequences of OSA. However, the extent to which these biological mechanisms contribute directly to the onset, persistence, or exacerbation of psychiatric symptoms remains insufficiently understood.</p><p>In this issue, Sommerhoff et al. report a timely systematic review and meta-analysis examining the prevalence of OSA in individuals with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder [<span>5</span>]. Their review included 55 studies in the systematic review, of which 47 were included in the meta-analysis. The importance of this work lies not only in quantifying the frequency of OSA and elevated OSA risk in these populations, but also in highlighting a practical clinical message: sleep-disordered breathing should be routinely considered as part of comprehensive assessment in people with severe mental illness.</p><p>Importantly, these findings should not be interpreted as demonstrating that OSA causes psychiatric disorders, or conversely that psychiatric disorders cause OSA. Much of the available evidence derives from cross-sectional observational studies, and the temporal and causal relationships remain uncertain. The association between OSA and psychiatric disorders is likely to be influenced by multiple shared factors, including obesity, age, sex, smoking, alcohol use, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, lifestyle factors, and the effects of psychotropic medications.</p><p>Nevertheless, uncertainty regarding causality does not diminish the importance of detecting and treating OSA. Hypertension, atrial fibrillation, stroke, coronary artery disease, metabolic disorders, accident risk, and cognitive impairment—conditions associated with OSA—are already disproportionately common among people with severe mental illness. These physical health inequalities contribute substantially to the marked excess mortality observed in this population [<span>6, 7</span>]. Identifying a treatable sleep-related breathing disorder may therefore offer an important opportunity to improve sleep, daytime functioning, and cardiometabolic health.</p><p>A major challenge in psychiatric practice is symptom overlap and the resulting diagnostic blind spots. Fatigue, low energy, reduced concentration, psychomotor slowing, irritability, reduced motivation, memory difficulties, and sleep disturbance may readily be attributed to depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, medication-related sedation, physical illness, or psychosocial stressors.</p><p>Monitoring sleep is essential in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder, including for the prevention of relapse and recurrence. However, fragmented sleep, non-restorative sleep, daytime sleepiness, and cognitive complaints should not automatically be regarded as psychiatric symptoms alone. They may also signal the presence of OSA. In schizophrenia in particular, negative symptoms, cognitive impairment, social isolation, and treatment with sedating medications may obscure daytime sleepiness and reduced motivation related to sleep-disordered breathing.</p><p>Psychotropic medications may further complicate this clinical picture. Some antipsychotics and mood stabilizers are associated with weight gain and metabolic abnormalities, potentially increasing the risk of OSA indirectly [<span>8, 9</span>]. Sedating medications may also affect arousal responses, respiratory physiology, or patients' awareness of daytime sleepiness. However, the association between OSA and psychiatric illness cannot be reduced simply to medication exposure. Weight trajectory, physical comorbidities, lifestyle, illness stage, symptom severity, and treatment regimen should all be considered in the individual patient.</p><p>The relationship between OSA, obesity, and metabolic dysfunction is also complex and potentially bidirectional. Obesity is an important risk factor for OSA, whereas sleep fragmentation and impaired daytime functioning may adversely affect physical activity, eating behavior, and weight management. OSA can occur in patients without marked obesity, including younger adults. Body mass index (BMI) alone should therefore not be used to exclude OSA.</p><p>The prevalence estimates reported by Sommerhoff et al. also require careful clinical interpretation. Estimates of OSA prevalence may differ substantially according to the study population, recruitment setting, psychiatric diagnostic criteria, definition of OSA, and assessment method. Studies conducted in sleep clinics, psychiatric inpatient wards, community services, and specialist outpatient settings are likely to identify populations with differing levels of risk.</p><p>Questionnaire-based screening tools identify individuals at elevated risk; they do not establish an OSA diagnosis. Polysomnography (PSG) remains the reference standard for diagnostic assessment. However, home sleep apnea testing may be an accessible and practical alternative for selected adults with a high pre-test probability of uncomplicated moderate-to-severe OSA [<span>10, 11</span>]. The choice of assessment should be individualized, taking account of coexisting sleep disorders, medical comorbidities, cognitive difficulties, living circumstances, and the practical support needed to complete testing.</p><p>Such heterogeneity should not be used as a reason to dismiss the relevance of OSA in psychiatric populations. Rather, it emphasizes the need to interpret prevalence estimates within their clinical context and to conduct better standardized studies.</p><p>In routine psychiatric practice, the relevant question is not whether every person with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder should undergo PSG. Universal PSG testing would neither be feasible nor necessary. A more useful question is whether psychiatric services routinely identify patients whose symptoms and risk profile warrant further evaluation. In many settings, the answer is still likely to be no.</p><p>A brief but sensitive OSA-focused assessment can be incorporated into routine psychiatric consultations. Clinicians should ask about habitual snoring, witnessed apneas, gasping or choking during sleep, nocturia, morning headaches, dry mouth on waking, non-restorative sleep, and unintended daytime dozing. Information from a partner, family member, caregiver, or—in inpatient settings—a roommate may be particularly valuable.</p><p>Assessment should also include BMI and, where possible, neck circumference, blood pressure, diabetes and cardiovascular disease, smoking and alcohol use, and treatment with sedative medications. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and STOP-Bang questionnaire can assist case-finding, but neither should be used as a substitute for diagnostic testing [<span>12, 13</span>]. Crucially, the absence of a strong subjective complaint of sleepiness should not exclude OSA. Some patients may normalize chronic fatigue, mask symptoms with caffeine or stimulant medication, or have difficulty recognizing and communicating their symptoms.</p><p>Clear referral pathways are essential. Where OSA is suspected, psychiatrists should be able to refer patients efficiently to primary care, sleep medicine, or respiratory services for appropriate assessment. Conversely, sleep clinicians should consider psychiatric symptoms, psychotropic medication use, cognitive impairment, social support, and the practical barriers that may affect diagnostic completion and treatment continuation. The most effective model is likely to be collaborative rather than sequential: sleep medicine and psychiatric care should not function as isolated systems.</p><p>Although effective treatment is available, implementation matters. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment for moderate-to-severe OSA and, in appropriately selected patients, improves respiratory outcomes, daytime sleepiness, and quality of life [<span>14</span>]. Other treatment options include weight management, positional therapy, oral appliances for suitable patients, treatment of nasal obstruction, and surgical approaches in selected circumstances [<span>10, 15</span>]. Management should be individualized according to OSA severity, anatomical factors, comorbidities, patient preferences, and living circumstances.</p><p>The assumption that people with severe mental illness cannot accept or manage CPAP should be challenged. Cognitive impairment, anxiety, sensory sensitivity, unstable housing, financial difficulties, stigma, and limited social support may affect treatment initiation and adherence. However, such barriers are not unique to psychiatric populations, nor are they necessarily insurmountable.</p><p>Early education, careful mask fitting, gradual acclimatization, behavioral support, involvement of family members or caregivers where appropriate, and close follow-up can make a substantial difference. Psychiatric teams are particularly well-placed to identify and address factors that may interfere with adherence.</p><p>Further research is needed to clarify the effects of OSA treatment on psychiatric outcomes. CPAP is not a first-line treatment for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder itself. Nevertheless, treating OSA may reduce sleep fragmentation, fatigue, cognitive complaints, and the physiological burden that can amplify cardiometabolic risk. Even modest improvements may be clinically meaningful in a population with high rates of obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and premature mortality [<span>6, 7</span>].</p><p>Looking ahead, several research priorities remain. The work of Sommerhoff et al. demonstrates both the importance of this topic and the limitations of the current evidence base. Future studies should use standardized definitions and assessment methods for OSA, clearly distinguish screening-defined high risk from objectively confirmed OSA, and report findings separately by psychiatric diagnosis, age, sex, BMI, neck circumference, psychotropic medication use, duration and stage of illness, symptom severity, physical comorbidity, and treatment setting.</p><p>Prospective longitudinal studies are particularly needed to clarify temporal and causal relationships. Does OSA contribute to the onset or recurrence of depressive episodes? Does it influence mood instability in bipolar disorder, or cognitive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia? Can OSA treatment improve psychiatric symptoms, cognitive function, hospitalization rates, and cardiometabolic outcomes? What approaches most effectively support diagnostic completion and sustained CPAP use among people with severe mental illness?</p><p>Equity should also be central to this research agenda. The geographical distribution of the studies summarized by Sommerhoff et al. was uneven, with limited evidence from Africa and no evidence from Oceania. Future work should include more diverse populations and healthcare systems, especially in regions where access to sleep diagnostics and treatment remains limited.</p><p>In conclusion, OSA is common, clinically consequential, and treatable. In people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder, it may be overlooked because of symptom overlap, psychotropic medication effects, physical comorbidity, and fragmented models of care.</p><p>The systematic review and meta-analysis by Sommerhoff et al. should encourage psychiatric clinicians to look beyond insomnia and sleep duration and to ask a more fundamental question: “Is this patient breathing normally during sleep?”</p><p>Recognizing OSA will not resolve every psychiatric or medical problem. However, failing to recognize it may leave a treatable contributor to poor health and functional impairment unaddressed. Incorporating case-finding, appropriate referral, and collaboration between psychiatric and sleep services into routine mental healthcare is a practical and important step toward more comprehensive and equitable psychiatry care.</p><p>The author has nothing to report.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p><p>Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed for this editorial.</p>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":"154 5","pages":"319-321"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acps.70140","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acps.70140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a sleep-related breathing disorder characterized by recurrent upper-airway obstruction during sleep, resulting in apnea or hypopnea, intermittent hypoxemia, sleep fragmentation, and fluctuations in intrathoracic pressure. OSA is highly prevalent in the general population; when mild disease is included, it is estimated to affect approximately 9%–38% of adults [1]. Common manifestations include habitual snoring, witnessed apneas, gasping or choking during sleep, nocturia, morning headache, dry mouth, excessive daytime sleepiness, fatigue, impaired concentration, and non-restorative sleep.

Untreated OSA is associated with hypertension, atrial fibrillation, stroke, coronary artery disease, metabolic abnormalities, obesity, accident risk, and cognitive impairment [2-4]. Intermittent hypoxia, sleep fragmentation, sympathetic activation, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses have all been implicated in the cardiovascular and metabolic consequences of OSA. However, the extent to which these biological mechanisms contribute directly to the onset, persistence, or exacerbation of psychiatric symptoms remains insufficiently understood.

In this issue, Sommerhoff et al. report a timely systematic review and meta-analysis examining the prevalence of OSA in individuals with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder [5]. Their review included 55 studies in the systematic review, of which 47 were included in the meta-analysis. The importance of this work lies not only in quantifying the frequency of OSA and elevated OSA risk in these populations, but also in highlighting a practical clinical message: sleep-disordered breathing should be routinely considered as part of comprehensive assessment in people with severe mental illness.

Importantly, these findings should not be interpreted as demonstrating that OSA causes psychiatric disorders, or conversely that psychiatric disorders cause OSA. Much of the available evidence derives from cross-sectional observational studies, and the temporal and causal relationships remain uncertain. The association between OSA and psychiatric disorders is likely to be influenced by multiple shared factors, including obesity, age, sex, smoking, alcohol use, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, lifestyle factors, and the effects of psychotropic medications.

Nevertheless, uncertainty regarding causality does not diminish the importance of detecting and treating OSA. Hypertension, atrial fibrillation, stroke, coronary artery disease, metabolic disorders, accident risk, and cognitive impairment—conditions associated with OSA—are already disproportionately common among people with severe mental illness. These physical health inequalities contribute substantially to the marked excess mortality observed in this population [6, 7]. Identifying a treatable sleep-related breathing disorder may therefore offer an important opportunity to improve sleep, daytime functioning, and cardiometabolic health.

A major challenge in psychiatric practice is symptom overlap and the resulting diagnostic blind spots. Fatigue, low energy, reduced concentration, psychomotor slowing, irritability, reduced motivation, memory difficulties, and sleep disturbance may readily be attributed to depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, medication-related sedation, physical illness, or psychosocial stressors.

Monitoring sleep is essential in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder, including for the prevention of relapse and recurrence. However, fragmented sleep, non-restorative sleep, daytime sleepiness, and cognitive complaints should not automatically be regarded as psychiatric symptoms alone. They may also signal the presence of OSA. In schizophrenia in particular, negative symptoms, cognitive impairment, social isolation, and treatment with sedating medications may obscure daytime sleepiness and reduced motivation related to sleep-disordered breathing.

Psychotropic medications may further complicate this clinical picture. Some antipsychotics and mood stabilizers are associated with weight gain and metabolic abnormalities, potentially increasing the risk of OSA indirectly [8, 9]. Sedating medications may also affect arousal responses, respiratory physiology, or patients' awareness of daytime sleepiness. However, the association between OSA and psychiatric illness cannot be reduced simply to medication exposure. Weight trajectory, physical comorbidities, lifestyle, illness stage, symptom severity, and treatment regimen should all be considered in the individual patient.

The relationship between OSA, obesity, and metabolic dysfunction is also complex and potentially bidirectional. Obesity is an important risk factor for OSA, whereas sleep fragmentation and impaired daytime functioning may adversely affect physical activity, eating behavior, and weight management. OSA can occur in patients without marked obesity, including younger adults. Body mass index (BMI) alone should therefore not be used to exclude OSA.

The prevalence estimates reported by Sommerhoff et al. also require careful clinical interpretation. Estimates of OSA prevalence may differ substantially according to the study population, recruitment setting, psychiatric diagnostic criteria, definition of OSA, and assessment method. Studies conducted in sleep clinics, psychiatric inpatient wards, community services, and specialist outpatient settings are likely to identify populations with differing levels of risk.

Questionnaire-based screening tools identify individuals at elevated risk; they do not establish an OSA diagnosis. Polysomnography (PSG) remains the reference standard for diagnostic assessment. However, home sleep apnea testing may be an accessible and practical alternative for selected adults with a high pre-test probability of uncomplicated moderate-to-severe OSA [10, 11]. The choice of assessment should be individualized, taking account of coexisting sleep disorders, medical comorbidities, cognitive difficulties, living circumstances, and the practical support needed to complete testing.

Such heterogeneity should not be used as a reason to dismiss the relevance of OSA in psychiatric populations. Rather, it emphasizes the need to interpret prevalence estimates within their clinical context and to conduct better standardized studies.

In routine psychiatric practice, the relevant question is not whether every person with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder should undergo PSG. Universal PSG testing would neither be feasible nor necessary. A more useful question is whether psychiatric services routinely identify patients whose symptoms and risk profile warrant further evaluation. In many settings, the answer is still likely to be no.

A brief but sensitive OSA-focused assessment can be incorporated into routine psychiatric consultations. Clinicians should ask about habitual snoring, witnessed apneas, gasping or choking during sleep, nocturia, morning headaches, dry mouth on waking, non-restorative sleep, and unintended daytime dozing. Information from a partner, family member, caregiver, or—in inpatient settings—a roommate may be particularly valuable.

Assessment should also include BMI and, where possible, neck circumference, blood pressure, diabetes and cardiovascular disease, smoking and alcohol use, and treatment with sedative medications. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and STOP-Bang questionnaire can assist case-finding, but neither should be used as a substitute for diagnostic testing [12, 13]. Crucially, the absence of a strong subjective complaint of sleepiness should not exclude OSA. Some patients may normalize chronic fatigue, mask symptoms with caffeine or stimulant medication, or have difficulty recognizing and communicating their symptoms.

Clear referral pathways are essential. Where OSA is suspected, psychiatrists should be able to refer patients efficiently to primary care, sleep medicine, or respiratory services for appropriate assessment. Conversely, sleep clinicians should consider psychiatric symptoms, psychotropic medication use, cognitive impairment, social support, and the practical barriers that may affect diagnostic completion and treatment continuation. The most effective model is likely to be collaborative rather than sequential: sleep medicine and psychiatric care should not function as isolated systems.

Although effective treatment is available, implementation matters. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment for moderate-to-severe OSA and, in appropriately selected patients, improves respiratory outcomes, daytime sleepiness, and quality of life [14]. Other treatment options include weight management, positional therapy, oral appliances for suitable patients, treatment of nasal obstruction, and surgical approaches in selected circumstances [10, 15]. Management should be individualized according to OSA severity, anatomical factors, comorbidities, patient preferences, and living circumstances.

The assumption that people with severe mental illness cannot accept or manage CPAP should be challenged. Cognitive impairment, anxiety, sensory sensitivity, unstable housing, financial difficulties, stigma, and limited social support may affect treatment initiation and adherence. However, such barriers are not unique to psychiatric populations, nor are they necessarily insurmountable.

Early education, careful mask fitting, gradual acclimatization, behavioral support, involvement of family members or caregivers where appropriate, and close follow-up can make a substantial difference. Psychiatric teams are particularly well-placed to identify and address factors that may interfere with adherence.

Further research is needed to clarify the effects of OSA treatment on psychiatric outcomes. CPAP is not a first-line treatment for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder itself. Nevertheless, treating OSA may reduce sleep fragmentation, fatigue, cognitive complaints, and the physiological burden that can amplify cardiometabolic risk. Even modest improvements may be clinically meaningful in a population with high rates of obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and premature mortality [6, 7].

Looking ahead, several research priorities remain. The work of Sommerhoff et al. demonstrates both the importance of this topic and the limitations of the current evidence base. Future studies should use standardized definitions and assessment methods for OSA, clearly distinguish screening-defined high risk from objectively confirmed OSA, and report findings separately by psychiatric diagnosis, age, sex, BMI, neck circumference, psychotropic medication use, duration and stage of illness, symptom severity, physical comorbidity, and treatment setting.

Prospective longitudinal studies are particularly needed to clarify temporal and causal relationships. Does OSA contribute to the onset or recurrence of depressive episodes? Does it influence mood instability in bipolar disorder, or cognitive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia? Can OSA treatment improve psychiatric symptoms, cognitive function, hospitalization rates, and cardiometabolic outcomes? What approaches most effectively support diagnostic completion and sustained CPAP use among people with severe mental illness?

Equity should also be central to this research agenda. The geographical distribution of the studies summarized by Sommerhoff et al. was uneven, with limited evidence from Africa and no evidence from Oceania. Future work should include more diverse populations and healthcare systems, especially in regions where access to sleep diagnostics and treatment remains limited.

In conclusion, OSA is common, clinically consequential, and treatable. In people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder, it may be overlooked because of symptom overlap, psychotropic medication effects, physical comorbidity, and fragmented models of care.

The systematic review and meta-analysis by Sommerhoff et al. should encourage psychiatric clinicians to look beyond insomnia and sleep duration and to ask a more fundamental question: “Is this patient breathing normally during sleep?”

Recognizing OSA will not resolve every psychiatric or medical problem. However, failing to recognize it may leave a treatable contributor to poor health and functional impairment unaddressed. Incorporating case-finding, appropriate referral, and collaboration between psychiatric and sleep services into routine mental healthcare is a practical and important step toward more comprehensive and equitable psychiatry care.

The author has nothing to report.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed for this editorial.

精神病学实践中的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停:一种被忽视的、可治疗的合并症。
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一种睡眠相关的呼吸障碍,其特征是睡眠时反复出现上呼吸道阻塞,导致呼吸暂停或低通气、间歇性低氧血症、睡眠破碎和胸内压波动。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停在普通人群中非常普遍;如果包括轻度疾病,估计约有9%-38%的成年人受到影响。常见的表现包括习惯性打鼾、呼吸暂停、睡眠中喘气或窒息、夜尿症、早晨头痛、口干、白天过度嗜睡、疲劳、注意力不集中和非恢复性睡眠。未经治疗的OSA与高血压、房颤、中风、冠状动脉疾病、代谢异常、肥胖、事故风险和认知障碍有关[2-4]。间歇性缺氧、睡眠断裂、交感神经激活、氧化应激和炎症反应都与OSA的心血管和代谢后果有关。然而,这些生物学机制在多大程度上直接导致精神症状的发生、持续或恶化,仍然没有得到充分的了解。在这期杂志上,Sommerhoff等人报告了一项及时的系统综述和荟萃分析,研究了精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症患者中OSA的患病率。他们的综述纳入了系统综述中的55项研究,其中47项纳入了荟萃分析。这项工作的重要性不仅在于量化这些人群中阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的频率和升高的风险,而且还强调了一个实用的临床信息:睡眠呼吸障碍应被常规视为严重精神疾病患者综合评估的一部分。重要的是,这些发现不应被解释为证明OSA导致精神障碍,或相反,精神障碍导致OSA。许多现有证据来自横断面观察性研究,时间和因果关系仍然不确定。OSA与精神疾病之间的关联可能受到多种共同因素的影响,包括肥胖、年龄、性别、吸烟、饮酒、糖尿病、心血管疾病、生活方式因素和精神药物的影响。然而,因果关系的不确定性并不会降低检测和治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的重要性。高血压、心房颤动、中风、冠状动脉疾病、代谢紊乱、事故风险和认知障碍——与osa相关的状况——在严重精神疾病患者中已经不成比例地常见。这些身体健康方面的不平等在很大程度上导致了这一人群中观察到的明显过高的死亡率[6,7]。因此,确定一种可治疗的睡眠相关呼吸障碍可能为改善睡眠、白天功能和心脏代谢健康提供重要机会。精神病学实践中的一个主要挑战是症状重叠和由此产生的诊断盲点。疲劳、精力不足、注意力不集中、精神运动减缓、易怒、动机降低、记忆困难和睡眠障碍可能很容易归因于抑郁症、精神分裂症、双相情感障碍、药物相关镇静、身体疾病或社会心理压力源。监测睡眠对精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症至关重要,包括预防复发和复发。然而,碎片化睡眠、非恢复性睡眠、白天嗜睡和认知症状不应被自动视为精神症状。它们也可能是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的信号。特别是在精神分裂症中,阴性症状、认知障碍、社会隔离和镇静药物治疗可能会掩盖与睡眠呼吸障碍相关的白天嗜睡和动机降低。精神药物可能会使这一临床症状进一步复杂化。一些抗精神病药物和情绪稳定剂与体重增加和代谢异常有关,可能间接增加OSA的风险[8,9]。镇静药物也可能影响唤醒反应、呼吸生理或患者对白天困倦的意识。然而,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停和精神疾病之间的联系不能简单地归结为药物暴露。个体患者的体重轨迹、身体合并症、生活方式、疾病分期、症状严重程度和治疗方案都应考虑在内。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停、肥胖和代谢功能障碍之间的关系也是复杂的,可能是双向的。肥胖是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的重要危险因素,而睡眠碎片化和白天功能受损可能对身体活动、饮食行为和体重管理产生不利影响。OSA可发生在没有明显肥胖的患者,包括年轻人。 因此,身体质量指数(BMI)不应单独用于排除OSA。Sommerhoff等人报告的患病率估计也需要仔细的临床解释。根据研究人群、招募环境、精神病学诊断标准、OSA的定义和评估方法,对OSA患病率的估计可能存在很大差异。在睡眠诊所、精神科住院病房、社区服务和专科门诊环境中进行的研究可能会确定不同风险水平的人群。基于问卷的筛查工具可识别高风险个体;它们不能诊断阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。多导睡眠图(PSG)仍然是诊断评估的参考标准。然而,家庭睡眠呼吸暂停测试可能是一种可行的替代方法,适用于测试前患有简单的中重度OSA的高概率成人[10,11]。评估的选择应个体化,考虑到共存的睡眠障碍、医学合并症、认知困难、生活环境以及完成测试所需的实际支持。这种异质性不应作为排除OSA与精神疾病人群相关性的理由。相反,它强调需要在临床背景下解释患病率估计,并进行更好的标准化研究。在常规的精神病学实践中,相关的问题不是是否每个患有精神分裂症、双相情感障碍或重度抑郁症的人都应该接受PSG。普遍的PSG检测既不可行也没有必要。一个更有用的问题是,精神科服务是否能常规地识别出那些症状和风险特征值得进一步评估的患者。在很多情况下,答案可能仍然是否定的。一个简短但敏感的以osa为重点的评估可以纳入常规精神病学咨询。临床医生应询问习惯性打鼾、睡眠时呼吸暂停、喘气或窒息、夜尿症、早晨头痛、醒来时口干、非恢复性睡眠和日间无意的打瞌睡。来自伴侣、家庭成员、照顾者,或者——在住院情况下——室友的信息可能特别有价值。评估还应包括身体质量指数,并在可能的情况下包括颈围、血压、糖尿病和心血管疾病、吸烟和饮酒以及使用镇静剂治疗。Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)和STOP-Bang问卷可以帮助发现病例,但两者都不应作为诊断测试的替代品[12,13]。至关重要的是,没有强烈的主观困倦主诉不应排除阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合症。一些患者可能使慢性疲劳正常化,用咖啡因或兴奋剂药物掩盖症状,或难以识别和交流症状。明确的转诊途径至关重要。当怀疑阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停时,精神科医生应该能够有效地将患者转介到初级保健、睡眠医学或呼吸服务部门进行适当的评估。相反,睡眠临床医生应该考虑精神症状、精神药物使用、认知障碍、社会支持以及可能影响诊断完成和治疗继续的实际障碍。最有效的模式可能是协作式的,而不是顺序式的:睡眠医学和精神病学护理不应该作为孤立的系统发挥作用。虽然有有效的治疗方法,但实施很重要。持续气道正压通气(CPAP)是中重度OSA的标准治疗方法,在适当选择的患者中,可改善呼吸结局、白天嗜睡和生活质量[10]。其他治疗选择包括体重管理、体位治疗、适合患者的口腔矫治器、鼻塞治疗以及在特定情况下的手术方法[10,15]。治疗应根据OSA的严重程度、解剖学因素、合并症、患者偏好和生活环境进行个体化。有严重精神疾病的人不能接受或管理CPAP的假设应该受到挑战。认知障碍、焦虑、感觉敏感、住房不稳定、经济困难、耻辱感和有限的社会支持都可能影响治疗的开始和坚持。然而,这些障碍并不是精神病人群所独有的,也不一定是不可克服的。早期教育、仔细佩戴口罩、逐渐适应环境、行为支持、家庭成员或适当照顾者的参与以及密切的随访可以产生实质性的影响。精神科团队在识别和处理可能影响依从性的因素方面处于特别有利的地位。需要进一步的研究来阐明OSA治疗对精神预后的影响。CPAP不是精神分裂症、双相情感障碍或重度抑郁症本身的一线治疗方法。 然而,治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停可能会减少睡眠片段化、疲劳、认知疾病和可能增加心脏代谢风险的生理负担。在肥胖、糖尿病、心血管疾病和过早死亡率高的人群中,即使是适度的改善也可能具有临床意义[6,7]。展望未来,仍有几个研究重点。Sommerhoff等人的工作既证明了这一主题的重要性,也证明了现有证据基础的局限性。未来的研究应采用标准化的OSA定义和评估方法,明确区分筛查定义的高风险与客观证实的OSA,并根据精神科诊断、年龄、性别、BMI、颈围、精神药物使用、病程和阶段、症状严重程度、躯体合并症和治疗环境分别报告结果。特别需要前瞻性的纵向研究来澄清时间和因果关系。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停是否会导致抑郁发作的发生或复发?它是否影响双相情感障碍的情绪不稳定,或精神分裂症的认知和阴性症状?OSA治疗能改善精神症状、认知功能、住院率和心脏代谢结局吗?哪些方法最有效地支持重度精神疾病患者完成诊断并持续使用CPAP ?公平也应该是这一研究议程的核心。Sommerhoff等人总结的研究的地理分布不均匀,来自非洲的证据有限,没有来自大洋洲的证据。未来的工作应该包括更多样化的人群和医疗保健系统,特别是在获得睡眠诊断和治疗仍然有限的地区。总之,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停是常见的,临床结果,可治疗的。在精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症患者中,由于症状重叠、精神药物作用、身体合并症和支离破碎的护理模式,它可能被忽视。Sommerhoff等人的系统回顾和荟萃分析应该鼓励精神病临床医生超越失眠和睡眠时间,并提出一个更基本的问题:“这个病人在睡眠中呼吸正常吗?”认识到阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停并不能解决所有的精神或医学问题。然而,如果不认识到这一点,可能会导致健康状况不佳和功能障碍的可治疗因素得不到解决。将病例发现、适当转诊以及精神科和睡眠服务之间的合作纳入日常精神保健,是朝着更全面和公平的精神科护理迈出的实际而重要的一步。作者没有什么可报道的。作者声明无利益冲突。数据共享不适用于本文,因为本文没有生成或分析数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书