Machine learning algorithms for transplanting accelerometer observations in future satellite gravimetry missions

IF 4.7 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Mohsen Romeshkani,Jürgen Müller,Sahar Ebadi,Alexey Kupriyanov,Annike Knabe,Nina Fletling,Manuel Schilling
{"title":"Machine learning algorithms for transplanting accelerometer observations in future satellite gravimetry missions","authors":"Mohsen Romeshkani,Jürgen Müller,Sahar Ebadi,Alexey Kupriyanov,Annike Knabe,Nina Fletling,Manuel Schilling","doi":"10.1007/s00190-026-02108-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Accurate and continuous monitoring of Earth’s gravity field is essential for tracking mass redistribution processes linked to climate variability, hydrological cycles, and geodynamic phenomena. While the GRACE and GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) missions have set the benchmark for satellite gravimetry using low–low satellite-to-satellite tracking (LL-SST), the precision of gravity field recovery still strongly depends on the quality of accelerometer (ACC) performance. Traditional electrostatic accelerometers (EA) face limitations that can hinder mission outcomes, prompting exploration of advanced sensor technologies and data recovery techniques. This study presents a systematic evaluation of accelerometer data transplantation (i.e., the reconstruction and transfer of non-gravitational acceleration measurements between satellites) using novel accelerometer configurations, including Cold Atom Interferometry (CAI) accelerometers and hybrid EA-CAI setups, and applying both analytical and machine learning-based methods. Using comprehensive closed-loop LL-SST simulations, we compare four scenarios ranging from the conventional EA-only setup to ideal dual hybrid configurations, with a particular focus on the performance of transplant-based approaches using different neural network approaches. Our results show that the dual hybrid configuration provides the most accurate gravity field retrieval. However, the transplant-based hybrid setup, particularly when supported by machine learning (ML), emerges as a robust and cost-effective alternative, achieving comparable performance while significantly reducing the need for high-precision accelerometers across the constellation, thereby lowering mission costs and system complexity. These findings highlight the promise of combining quantum sensor technology and data-driven transplantation for future satellite gravimetry missions, paving the way for improved global monitoring of Earth’s dynamic gravity field.","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-026-02108-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Accurate and continuous monitoring of Earth’s gravity field is essential for tracking mass redistribution processes linked to climate variability, hydrological cycles, and geodynamic phenomena. While the GRACE and GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) missions have set the benchmark for satellite gravimetry using low–low satellite-to-satellite tracking (LL-SST), the precision of gravity field recovery still strongly depends on the quality of accelerometer (ACC) performance. Traditional electrostatic accelerometers (EA) face limitations that can hinder mission outcomes, prompting exploration of advanced sensor technologies and data recovery techniques. This study presents a systematic evaluation of accelerometer data transplantation (i.e., the reconstruction and transfer of non-gravitational acceleration measurements between satellites) using novel accelerometer configurations, including Cold Atom Interferometry (CAI) accelerometers and hybrid EA-CAI setups, and applying both analytical and machine learning-based methods. Using comprehensive closed-loop LL-SST simulations, we compare four scenarios ranging from the conventional EA-only setup to ideal dual hybrid configurations, with a particular focus on the performance of transplant-based approaches using different neural network approaches. Our results show that the dual hybrid configuration provides the most accurate gravity field retrieval. However, the transplant-based hybrid setup, particularly when supported by machine learning (ML), emerges as a robust and cost-effective alternative, achieving comparable performance while significantly reducing the need for high-precision accelerometers across the constellation, thereby lowering mission costs and system complexity. These findings highlight the promise of combining quantum sensor technology and data-driven transplantation for future satellite gravimetry missions, paving the way for improved global monitoring of Earth’s dynamic gravity field.
在未来卫星重力测量任务中移植加速度计观测数据的机器学习算法
精确和连续的地球重力场监测对于跟踪与气候变率、水文循环和地球动力学现象相关的质量再分配过程至关重要。虽然GRACE和GRACE后续(GRACE- fo)任务已经为使用低-低卫星对卫星跟踪(LL-SST)的卫星重力测量设定了基准,但重力场恢复的精度仍然很大程度上取决于加速度计(ACC)性能的质量。传统的静电加速度计(EA)面临可能阻碍任务结果的局限性,促使探索先进的传感器技术和数据恢复技术。本研究采用新型加速度计配置,包括冷原子干涉(CAI)加速度计和混合EA-CAI设置,并应用分析和基于机器学习的方法,对加速度计数据移植(即卫星之间非重力加速度测量的重建和转移)进行了系统评估。通过全面的闭环LL-SST模拟,我们比较了从传统的ea设置到理想的双混合配置的四种场景,特别关注了使用不同神经网络方法的基于移植的方法的性能。结果表明,双混合结构提供了最精确的重力场反演。然而,基于移植的混合设置,特别是在机器学习(ML)的支持下,成为一种强大且具有成本效益的替代方案,实现了相当的性能,同时显着减少了整个星座对高精度加速度计的需求,从而降低了任务成本和系统复杂性。这些发现强调了将量子传感器技术和数据驱动移植结合起来用于未来卫星重力测量任务的前景,为改进全球地球动态重力场监测铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书