Walter Di Nicola, Henrich Maik, Hannah Pepe, Marc Velling, Ye Htet Lwin, Suzanne T. S. van Beeck Calkoen, Vorel Ales, Chris Smit, Dries Kuijper, Marco Heurich
{"title":"Wolves and humans both shape patterns of deer browsing in a temperate forest ecosystem of Central Europe","authors":"Walter Di Nicola, Henrich Maik, Hannah Pepe, Marc Velling, Ye Htet Lwin, Suzanne T. S. van Beeck Calkoen, Vorel Ales, Chris Smit, Dries Kuijper, Marco Heurich","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predator–prey interactions can trigger behavioural responses in ungulates, influencing their space-use and foraging behaviour and, in turn, indirectly affecting browsing pressure. Changes in browsing pressure can affect plant recruitment and species composition, shaping forest regeneration through predator-mediated trophic cascades. Despite ecological significance, the extent to which predators indirectly affect browsing remains debated, particularly in anthropogenic landscapes where human impacts can interact with predator effects.</p><p>In this study, we investigated interactions across trophic guilds and their consequences for ungulate browsing pressure while accounting for human lethal and non-lethal activities. Human disturbance was quantified using surveys of recreational activities and hunting locations. Wolf space-use and kill-sites density were mapped from GPS telemetry; lynx and red and roe deer density was modelled from camera trap data. To monitor vegetation change, browsing pressure was assessed through landscape-scale field surveys in two years: before and after wolf establishment. All datasets were modelled to evaluate tri-trophic interactions in the Bavarian Forest National Park (Germany).</p><p>On the landscape-scale, browsing pressure was lower in the core of wolf territories and areas with higher human recreation intensity, whereas deer relative abundance was not lower in these areas. In contrast, browsing pressure was greater in areas with higher lynx activity and higher wolf kill-sites density. Comparison of browsing data before and after wolf establishment indicated that wolf recolonisation locally altered deer browsing patterns but did not affect overall browsing intensity. Overall browsing intensity increased across the park but declined within areas of high wolf utilisation density.</p><p>By analysing tri-trophic interactions incorporating human activities, this study provides field-based insights into trophic interactions in a temperate forest ecosystem. Results indicate that returning predators can resume their ecological functions within anthropogenic landscapes, with wolf effects on lower trophic levels comparable in strength to those of humans in shaping ungulate browsing patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2026 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecog.08726","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecog.08726","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Predator–prey interactions can trigger behavioural responses in ungulates, influencing their space-use and foraging behaviour and, in turn, indirectly affecting browsing pressure. Changes in browsing pressure can affect plant recruitment and species composition, shaping forest regeneration through predator-mediated trophic cascades. Despite ecological significance, the extent to which predators indirectly affect browsing remains debated, particularly in anthropogenic landscapes where human impacts can interact with predator effects.
In this study, we investigated interactions across trophic guilds and their consequences for ungulate browsing pressure while accounting for human lethal and non-lethal activities. Human disturbance was quantified using surveys of recreational activities and hunting locations. Wolf space-use and kill-sites density were mapped from GPS telemetry; lynx and red and roe deer density was modelled from camera trap data. To monitor vegetation change, browsing pressure was assessed through landscape-scale field surveys in two years: before and after wolf establishment. All datasets were modelled to evaluate tri-trophic interactions in the Bavarian Forest National Park (Germany).
On the landscape-scale, browsing pressure was lower in the core of wolf territories and areas with higher human recreation intensity, whereas deer relative abundance was not lower in these areas. In contrast, browsing pressure was greater in areas with higher lynx activity and higher wolf kill-sites density. Comparison of browsing data before and after wolf establishment indicated that wolf recolonisation locally altered deer browsing patterns but did not affect overall browsing intensity. Overall browsing intensity increased across the park but declined within areas of high wolf utilisation density.
By analysing tri-trophic interactions incorporating human activities, this study provides field-based insights into trophic interactions in a temperate forest ecosystem. Results indicate that returning predators can resume their ecological functions within anthropogenic landscapes, with wolf effects on lower trophic levels comparable in strength to those of humans in shaping ungulate browsing patterns.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.