Wolves and humans both shape patterns of deer browsing in a temperate forest ecosystem of Central Europe

IF 5.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ecography Pub Date : 2026-10-06 Epub Date: 2026-09-21 DOI:10.1002/ecog.08726
Walter Di Nicola, Henrich Maik, Hannah Pepe, Marc Velling, Ye Htet Lwin, Suzanne T. S. van Beeck Calkoen, Vorel Ales, Chris Smit, Dries Kuijper, Marco Heurich
{"title":"Wolves and humans both shape patterns of deer browsing in a temperate forest ecosystem of Central Europe","authors":"Walter Di Nicola,&nbsp;Henrich Maik,&nbsp;Hannah Pepe,&nbsp;Marc Velling,&nbsp;Ye Htet Lwin,&nbsp;Suzanne T. S. van Beeck Calkoen,&nbsp;Vorel Ales,&nbsp;Chris Smit,&nbsp;Dries Kuijper,&nbsp;Marco Heurich","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predator–prey interactions can trigger behavioural responses in ungulates, influencing their space-use and foraging behaviour and, in turn, indirectly affecting browsing pressure. Changes in browsing pressure can affect plant recruitment and species composition, shaping forest regeneration through predator-mediated trophic cascades. Despite ecological significance, the extent to which predators indirectly affect browsing remains debated, particularly in anthropogenic landscapes where human impacts can interact with predator effects.</p><p>In this study, we investigated interactions across trophic guilds and their consequences for ungulate browsing pressure while accounting for human lethal and non-lethal activities. Human disturbance was quantified using surveys of recreational activities and hunting locations. Wolf space-use and kill-sites density were mapped from GPS telemetry; lynx and red and roe deer density was modelled from camera trap data. To monitor vegetation change, browsing pressure was assessed through landscape-scale field surveys in two years: before and after wolf establishment. All datasets were modelled to evaluate tri-trophic interactions in the Bavarian Forest National Park (Germany).</p><p>On the landscape-scale, browsing pressure was lower in the core of wolf territories and areas with higher human recreation intensity, whereas deer relative abundance was not lower in these areas. In contrast, browsing pressure was greater in areas with higher lynx activity and higher wolf kill-sites density. Comparison of browsing data before and after wolf establishment indicated that wolf recolonisation locally altered deer browsing patterns but did not affect overall browsing intensity. Overall browsing intensity increased across the park but declined within areas of high wolf utilisation density.</p><p>By analysing tri-trophic interactions incorporating human activities, this study provides field-based insights into trophic interactions in a temperate forest ecosystem. Results indicate that returning predators can resume their ecological functions within anthropogenic landscapes, with wolf effects on lower trophic levels comparable in strength to those of humans in shaping ungulate browsing patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2026 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecog.08726","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecog.08726","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predator–prey interactions can trigger behavioural responses in ungulates, influencing their space-use and foraging behaviour and, in turn, indirectly affecting browsing pressure. Changes in browsing pressure can affect plant recruitment and species composition, shaping forest regeneration through predator-mediated trophic cascades. Despite ecological significance, the extent to which predators indirectly affect browsing remains debated, particularly in anthropogenic landscapes where human impacts can interact with predator effects.

In this study, we investigated interactions across trophic guilds and their consequences for ungulate browsing pressure while accounting for human lethal and non-lethal activities. Human disturbance was quantified using surveys of recreational activities and hunting locations. Wolf space-use and kill-sites density were mapped from GPS telemetry; lynx and red and roe deer density was modelled from camera trap data. To monitor vegetation change, browsing pressure was assessed through landscape-scale field surveys in two years: before and after wolf establishment. All datasets were modelled to evaluate tri-trophic interactions in the Bavarian Forest National Park (Germany).

On the landscape-scale, browsing pressure was lower in the core of wolf territories and areas with higher human recreation intensity, whereas deer relative abundance was not lower in these areas. In contrast, browsing pressure was greater in areas with higher lynx activity and higher wolf kill-sites density. Comparison of browsing data before and after wolf establishment indicated that wolf recolonisation locally altered deer browsing patterns but did not affect overall browsing intensity. Overall browsing intensity increased across the park but declined within areas of high wolf utilisation density.

By analysing tri-trophic interactions incorporating human activities, this study provides field-based insights into trophic interactions in a temperate forest ecosystem. Results indicate that returning predators can resume their ecological functions within anthropogenic landscapes, with wolf effects on lower trophic levels comparable in strength to those of humans in shaping ungulate browsing patterns.

在中欧的温带森林生态系统中,狼和人类都塑造了鹿的觅食模式
捕食者与猎物之间的相互作用会引发有蹄类动物的行为反应,影响它们对空间的利用和觅食行为,进而间接影响浏览压力。浏览压力的变化可以影响植物的补充和物种组成,通过捕食者介导的营养级联形成森林的更新。尽管具有生态意义,但捕食者间接影响浏览的程度仍存在争议,特别是在人类影响可能与捕食者影响相互作用的人为景观中。在这项研究中,我们调查了营养行会之间的相互作用及其对有蹄类动物浏览压力的影响,同时考虑了人类致命和非致命活动。利用娱乐活动和狩猎地点的调查对人为干扰进行了量化。利用GPS遥测技术绘制狼的空间利用和猎杀地点密度图;猞猁、红鹿和狍的密度是根据相机陷阱的数据建模的。为了监测植被变化,研究人员通过景观尺度的野外调查,在狼建立前后两年内评估了它们的浏览压力。所有数据集都被建模来评估巴伐利亚森林国家公园(德国)的三营养相互作用。在景观尺度上,狼的核心领地和人类活动强度较高的地区的鹿的浏览压力较低,而这些地区的鹿的相对丰度并不低。相比之下,在猞猁活动较多和狼捕杀点密度较高的地区,浏览压力更大。狼建立前后的浏览数据比较表明,狼的重新定居局部改变了鹿的浏览模式,但不影响整体的浏览强度。整个公园的总体浏览强度增加,但在狼利用密度高的区域有所下降。通过分析包含人类活动的三营养相互作用,本研究为温带森林生态系统的营养相互作用提供了基于野外的见解。结果表明,回归的捕食者可以在人为景观中恢复其生态功能,狼对低营养水平的影响与人类对有蹄类动物觅食模式的影响相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书