Asymmetric species turnover underpins the latitudinal diversity gradient in the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot of India

IF 5.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ecography Pub Date : 2026-10-06 Epub Date: 2026-09-21 DOI:10.1002/ecog.08538
Rohitashva Shukla, Vidyadhar Atkore, Anuradha Bhat, Neelesh Dahanukar, Jeyaraj Antony Johnson, Rajeev Raghavan, Maria Dornelas, Kartik Shanker, Anne E. Magurran
{"title":"Asymmetric species turnover underpins the latitudinal diversity gradient in the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot of India","authors":"Rohitashva Shukla,&nbsp;Vidyadhar Atkore,&nbsp;Anuradha Bhat,&nbsp;Neelesh Dahanukar,&nbsp;Jeyaraj Antony Johnson,&nbsp;Rajeev Raghavan,&nbsp;Maria Dornelas,&nbsp;Kartik Shanker,&nbsp;Anne E. Magurran","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Latitudinal diversity gradients (LDGs), namely an increase in species richness from higher to lower latitudes, are one of ecology's best documented patterns, yet how the fundamental components of compositional mismatches (i.e. species gains and losses along a gradient) explain these patterns remains poorly understood. As we argue here, one of two alternative turnover scenarios must apply to a typical latitudinal richness gradient. Such gradients can be the product of either a scenario where both species gains and losses are correlated and increase with geographical distance, or of uncorrelated change where species gains increase with distance, but losses remain constant. We distinguish between these alternatives using the freshwater fish communities of the Western Ghats of India, a biodiversity hotspot with a strong latitudinal species richness gradient. We find that the uncorrelated change scenario prevails for both taxonomic and functional diversity, and on both the western and eastern slopes of the mountain range, albeit with subtle differences. Our results suggest that these uncorrelated changes result from high nestedness among communities and reflect the dominance of dispersal processes in the region. As the observed pattern arises due to an increase in range-restricted species at lower latitudes, it is consistent with Rapoport's rule. Partitioning species turnover into its gain and loss components thus helps explain the mechanisms underlying latitudinal gradients of diversity, and informs our understanding of biodiversity change.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2026 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecog.08538","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecog.08538","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Latitudinal diversity gradients (LDGs), namely an increase in species richness from higher to lower latitudes, are one of ecology's best documented patterns, yet how the fundamental components of compositional mismatches (i.e. species gains and losses along a gradient) explain these patterns remains poorly understood. As we argue here, one of two alternative turnover scenarios must apply to a typical latitudinal richness gradient. Such gradients can be the product of either a scenario where both species gains and losses are correlated and increase with geographical distance, or of uncorrelated change where species gains increase with distance, but losses remain constant. We distinguish between these alternatives using the freshwater fish communities of the Western Ghats of India, a biodiversity hotspot with a strong latitudinal species richness gradient. We find that the uncorrelated change scenario prevails for both taxonomic and functional diversity, and on both the western and eastern slopes of the mountain range, albeit with subtle differences. Our results suggest that these uncorrelated changes result from high nestedness among communities and reflect the dominance of dispersal processes in the region. As the observed pattern arises due to an increase in range-restricted species at lower latitudes, it is consistent with Rapoport's rule. Partitioning species turnover into its gain and loss components thus helps explain the mechanisms underlying latitudinal gradients of diversity, and informs our understanding of biodiversity change.

印度西高止山脉生物多样性热点地区的不对称物种转换支撑着纬度多样性梯度
纬度多样性梯度(LDGs),即物种丰富度从高纬度到低纬度的增加,是生态学中记录最好的模式之一,然而,成分不匹配的基本组成部分(即沿着梯度的物种增减)如何解释这些模式仍然知之甚少。正如我们在这里讨论的那样,两种可选的更替情景之一必须适用于典型的纬向丰富度梯度。这种梯度可能是一种情况的产物,在这种情况下,物种的收益和损失都是相关的,并随着地理距离的增加而增加,或者是一种不相关的变化,即物种的收益随着距离的增加而增加,但损失保持不变。我们使用印度西高止山脉的淡水鱼群落来区分这些选择,这是一个具有很强纬度物种丰富度梯度的生物多样性热点。我们发现,尽管存在细微的差异,但分类学和功能多样性以及山脉的东西坡都普遍存在不相关的变化情景。我们的研究结果表明,这些不相关的变化是由于群落之间的高度筑巢性造成的,反映了该地区分散过程的优势。由于观测到的模式是由于低纬度地区范围限制物种的增加而产生的,这与Rapoport规则是一致的。因此,将物种更替划分为其收益和损失成分有助于解释多样性纬度梯度的机制,并有助于我们对生物多样性变化的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书