Rohitashva Shukla, Vidyadhar Atkore, Anuradha Bhat, Neelesh Dahanukar, Jeyaraj Antony Johnson, Rajeev Raghavan, Maria Dornelas, Kartik Shanker, Anne E. Magurran
{"title":"Asymmetric species turnover underpins the latitudinal diversity gradient in the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot of India","authors":"Rohitashva Shukla, Vidyadhar Atkore, Anuradha Bhat, Neelesh Dahanukar, Jeyaraj Antony Johnson, Rajeev Raghavan, Maria Dornelas, Kartik Shanker, Anne E. Magurran","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Latitudinal diversity gradients (LDGs), namely an increase in species richness from higher to lower latitudes, are one of ecology's best documented patterns, yet how the fundamental components of compositional mismatches (i.e. species gains and losses along a gradient) explain these patterns remains poorly understood. As we argue here, one of two alternative turnover scenarios must apply to a typical latitudinal richness gradient. Such gradients can be the product of either a scenario where both species gains and losses are correlated and increase with geographical distance, or of uncorrelated change where species gains increase with distance, but losses remain constant. We distinguish between these alternatives using the freshwater fish communities of the Western Ghats of India, a biodiversity hotspot with a strong latitudinal species richness gradient. We find that the uncorrelated change scenario prevails for both taxonomic and functional diversity, and on both the western and eastern slopes of the mountain range, albeit with subtle differences. Our results suggest that these uncorrelated changes result from high nestedness among communities and reflect the dominance of dispersal processes in the region. As the observed pattern arises due to an increase in range-restricted species at lower latitudes, it is consistent with Rapoport's rule. Partitioning species turnover into its gain and loss components thus helps explain the mechanisms underlying latitudinal gradients of diversity, and informs our understanding of biodiversity change.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2026 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecog.08538","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecog.08538","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Latitudinal diversity gradients (LDGs), namely an increase in species richness from higher to lower latitudes, are one of ecology's best documented patterns, yet how the fundamental components of compositional mismatches (i.e. species gains and losses along a gradient) explain these patterns remains poorly understood. As we argue here, one of two alternative turnover scenarios must apply to a typical latitudinal richness gradient. Such gradients can be the product of either a scenario where both species gains and losses are correlated and increase with geographical distance, or of uncorrelated change where species gains increase with distance, but losses remain constant. We distinguish between these alternatives using the freshwater fish communities of the Western Ghats of India, a biodiversity hotspot with a strong latitudinal species richness gradient. We find that the uncorrelated change scenario prevails for both taxonomic and functional diversity, and on both the western and eastern slopes of the mountain range, albeit with subtle differences. Our results suggest that these uncorrelated changes result from high nestedness among communities and reflect the dominance of dispersal processes in the region. As the observed pattern arises due to an increase in range-restricted species at lower latitudes, it is consistent with Rapoport's rule. Partitioning species turnover into its gain and loss components thus helps explain the mechanisms underlying latitudinal gradients of diversity, and informs our understanding of biodiversity change.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.