Additive Maize-Mung Bean Intercropping With Rice Husk Mulch Enhances Productivity, Physiological Performance, and Soil Biological Activity Under Deficit Irrigation

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Zahra Sayadi, Yaser Alizadeh, Ehsan Zeidali, Hamzeh Ali Alizadeh, Ekhlas Amini
{"title":"Additive Maize-Mung Bean Intercropping With Rice Husk Mulch Enhances Productivity, Physiological Performance, and Soil Biological Activity Under Deficit Irrigation","authors":"Zahra Sayadi,&nbsp;Yaser Alizadeh,&nbsp;Ehsan Zeidali,&nbsp;Hamzeh Ali Alizadeh,&nbsp;Ekhlas Amini","doi":"10.1111/jac.70245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Managing water scarcity requires stacking multiple agronomic practices, yet how deficit irrigation, mulching, and intercropping interact to shape crop physiology and soil biology is still unclear. This two-year field study (2024–2025) evaluated how applying rice husk mulch to a maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.)–mung bean (<i>Vigna radiata</i> L.) intercropping system alters yield, physiological responses, and soil biological properties across different irrigation regimes. A split-split-plot randomized complete block design with three replications structured the trial, with irrigation regimes (50%, 75%, and 100% field capacity) as main plots, mulch application (with/without) as subplots, and cropping patterns (sole cropping, additive, and replacement intercropping) as sub-subplots. Severe water limitation (50% field capacity) triggered sharp increases in oxidative stress markers, specifically catalase, proline, total flavonoids, and malondialdehyde (MDA), while depressing soil alkaline phosphatase, urease, and microbial respiration. Applying rice husk mulch reversed both the physiological and soil biological declines. Furthermore, additive intercropping pushed the land equivalent ratio above one, confirming a clear yield advantage over monocultures. Stacking additive maize–mung bean intercropping with rice husk mulch protects both plant physiology and soil biology under deficit irrigation, presenting a viable strategy for sustainable water management.</p>","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"212 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jac.70245","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jac.70245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managing water scarcity requires stacking multiple agronomic practices, yet how deficit irrigation, mulching, and intercropping interact to shape crop physiology and soil biology is still unclear. This two-year field study (2024–2025) evaluated how applying rice husk mulch to a maize (Zea mays L.)–mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) intercropping system alters yield, physiological responses, and soil biological properties across different irrigation regimes. A split-split-plot randomized complete block design with three replications structured the trial, with irrigation regimes (50%, 75%, and 100% field capacity) as main plots, mulch application (with/without) as subplots, and cropping patterns (sole cropping, additive, and replacement intercropping) as sub-subplots. Severe water limitation (50% field capacity) triggered sharp increases in oxidative stress markers, specifically catalase, proline, total flavonoids, and malondialdehyde (MDA), while depressing soil alkaline phosphatase, urease, and microbial respiration. Applying rice husk mulch reversed both the physiological and soil biological declines. Furthermore, additive intercropping pushed the land equivalent ratio above one, confirming a clear yield advantage over monocultures. Stacking additive maize–mung bean intercropping with rice husk mulch protects both plant physiology and soil biology under deficit irrigation, presenting a viable strategy for sustainable water management.

Abstract Image

添加剂玉米-绿豆间作稻壳覆盖提高了亏缺灌溉条件下的生产力、生理性能和土壤生物活性
管理水资源短缺需要叠加多种农艺实践,然而,缺乏灌溉、覆盖和间作如何相互作用来塑造作物生理和土壤生物学尚不清楚。这项为期两年的田间研究(2024-2025)评估了在玉米(Zea mays L.) -绿豆(Vigna radiata L.)间作系统中使用稻壳覆盖如何改变不同灌溉制度下的产量、生理反应和土壤生物学特性。试验采用分割-分割-小区随机完全区组设计,有3个重复,灌溉方案(50%、75%和100%田间容量)为主小区,地膜应用(有/没有)为次小区,种植模式(单作、加作和替代间作)为次小区。严重的限水(50%田间容量)引发氧化应激标志物急剧增加,特别是过氧化氢酶、脯氨酸、总黄酮和丙二醛(MDA),同时抑制土壤碱性磷酸酶、脲酶和微生物呼吸。覆盖稻壳可以逆转生理和土壤生物学上的衰退。此外,复合间作将土地等效比推高至1以上,证实了其明显优于单一栽培的产量优势。在亏缺灌溉条件下,玉米-绿豆与稻壳复盖复合对植物生理和土壤生物均有保护作用,是一种可行的可持续水管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
7.8 months
期刊介绍: The effects of stress on crop production of agricultural cultivated plants will grow to paramount importance in the 21st century, and the Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science aims to assist in understanding these challenges. In this context, stress refers to extreme conditions under which crops and forages grow. The journal publishes original papers and reviews on the general and special science of abiotic plant stress. Specific topics include: drought, including water-use efficiency, such as salinity, alkaline and acidic stress, extreme temperatures since heat, cold and chilling stress limit the cultivation of crops, flooding and oxidative stress, and means of restricting them. Special attention is on research which have the topic of narrowing the yield gap. The Journal will give preference to field research and studies on plant stress highlighting these subsections. Particular regard is given to application-oriented basic research and applied research. The application of the scientific principles of agricultural crop experimentation is an essential prerequisite for the publication. Studies based on field experiments must show that they have been repeated (at least three times) on the same organism or have been conducted on several different varieties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书