{"title":"Additive Maize-Mung Bean Intercropping With Rice Husk Mulch Enhances Productivity, Physiological Performance, and Soil Biological Activity Under Deficit Irrigation","authors":"Zahra Sayadi, Yaser Alizadeh, Ehsan Zeidali, Hamzeh Ali Alizadeh, Ekhlas Amini","doi":"10.1111/jac.70245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Managing water scarcity requires stacking multiple agronomic practices, yet how deficit irrigation, mulching, and intercropping interact to shape crop physiology and soil biology is still unclear. This two-year field study (2024–2025) evaluated how applying rice husk mulch to a maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.)–mung bean (<i>Vigna radiata</i> L.) intercropping system alters yield, physiological responses, and soil biological properties across different irrigation regimes. A split-split-plot randomized complete block design with three replications structured the trial, with irrigation regimes (50%, 75%, and 100% field capacity) as main plots, mulch application (with/without) as subplots, and cropping patterns (sole cropping, additive, and replacement intercropping) as sub-subplots. Severe water limitation (50% field capacity) triggered sharp increases in oxidative stress markers, specifically catalase, proline, total flavonoids, and malondialdehyde (MDA), while depressing soil alkaline phosphatase, urease, and microbial respiration. Applying rice husk mulch reversed both the physiological and soil biological declines. Furthermore, additive intercropping pushed the land equivalent ratio above one, confirming a clear yield advantage over monocultures. Stacking additive maize–mung bean intercropping with rice husk mulch protects both plant physiology and soil biology under deficit irrigation, presenting a viable strategy for sustainable water management.</p>","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"212 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jac.70245","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jac.70245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Managing water scarcity requires stacking multiple agronomic practices, yet how deficit irrigation, mulching, and intercropping interact to shape crop physiology and soil biology is still unclear. This two-year field study (2024–2025) evaluated how applying rice husk mulch to a maize (Zea mays L.)–mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) intercropping system alters yield, physiological responses, and soil biological properties across different irrigation regimes. A split-split-plot randomized complete block design with three replications structured the trial, with irrigation regimes (50%, 75%, and 100% field capacity) as main plots, mulch application (with/without) as subplots, and cropping patterns (sole cropping, additive, and replacement intercropping) as sub-subplots. Severe water limitation (50% field capacity) triggered sharp increases in oxidative stress markers, specifically catalase, proline, total flavonoids, and malondialdehyde (MDA), while depressing soil alkaline phosphatase, urease, and microbial respiration. Applying rice husk mulch reversed both the physiological and soil biological declines. Furthermore, additive intercropping pushed the land equivalent ratio above one, confirming a clear yield advantage over monocultures. Stacking additive maize–mung bean intercropping with rice husk mulch protects both plant physiology and soil biology under deficit irrigation, presenting a viable strategy for sustainable water management.
期刊介绍:
The effects of stress on crop production of agricultural cultivated plants will grow to paramount importance in the 21st century, and the Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science aims to assist in understanding these challenges. In this context, stress refers to extreme conditions under which crops and forages grow. The journal publishes original papers and reviews on the general and special science of abiotic plant stress. Specific topics include: drought, including water-use efficiency, such as salinity, alkaline and acidic stress, extreme temperatures since heat, cold and chilling stress limit the cultivation of crops, flooding and oxidative stress, and means of restricting them. Special attention is on research which have the topic of narrowing the yield gap. The Journal will give preference to field research and studies on plant stress highlighting these subsections. Particular regard is given to application-oriented basic research and applied research. The application of the scientific principles of agricultural crop experimentation is an essential prerequisite for the publication. Studies based on field experiments must show that they have been repeated (at least three times) on the same organism or have been conducted on several different varieties.