Synthesis of scale‐dependent plant biodiversity change in climate warming experiments

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2026-09-22 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70486
Lotte Korell, Martin Andrzejak, Jonathan M. Chase, W. Stanley Harpole, Tiffany M. Knight
{"title":"Synthesis of scale‐dependent plant biodiversity change in climate warming experiments","authors":"Lotte Korell, Martin Andrzejak, Jonathan M. Chase, W. Stanley Harpole, Tiffany M. Knight","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate warming is one of the most pressing environmental challenges for plant populations, communities, and ecosystems on earth. Warming experiments are an important tool for establishing causal relationships between climate change and plant diversity responses. However, results from such experiments vary in direction and magnitude. We hypothesize that such variation arises from context‐dependent factors, such as the magnitude of the temperature manipulation, the study duration, the spatial grain of the analysis, the background climate in which the study was conducted, and the biodiversity metrics used. Here, we present a comprehensive synthesis of primary data from 42 warming experiments, mostly from tundra and grassland ecosystems. We examined how warming influenced composition and how responses of plant diversity varied at the alpha (= plot), beta (= plot‐to‐plot), and gamma (= site) scales. Context‐dependent factors explained some of the variation observed in responses across studies. Higher magnitudes of warming led to stronger declines in species richness at the alpha scale. Experimental warming led to stronger declines in species richness in plant communities with warmer background summer temperature (e.g., desert grasslands) compared to those in communities exposed to colder background summer temperatures (e.g., tundra communities). Warming decreased evenness at the local (alpha) scale, but increased evenness at the beta scale, indicating that replicate warming plots diverged in their abundance distribution over time. Warming changed the composition of plant communities, particularly through species turnover rather than in the nestedness component, suggesting that warming leads to novel species assemblages. Our study highlights that responses of terrestrial plant communities to warming depend on experimental methodology, environmental context, and the spatial grain of investigation.","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.70486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate warming is one of the most pressing environmental challenges for plant populations, communities, and ecosystems on earth. Warming experiments are an important tool for establishing causal relationships between climate change and plant diversity responses. However, results from such experiments vary in direction and magnitude. We hypothesize that such variation arises from context‐dependent factors, such as the magnitude of the temperature manipulation, the study duration, the spatial grain of the analysis, the background climate in which the study was conducted, and the biodiversity metrics used. Here, we present a comprehensive synthesis of primary data from 42 warming experiments, mostly from tundra and grassland ecosystems. We examined how warming influenced composition and how responses of plant diversity varied at the alpha (= plot), beta (= plot‐to‐plot), and gamma (= site) scales. Context‐dependent factors explained some of the variation observed in responses across studies. Higher magnitudes of warming led to stronger declines in species richness at the alpha scale. Experimental warming led to stronger declines in species richness in plant communities with warmer background summer temperature (e.g., desert grasslands) compared to those in communities exposed to colder background summer temperatures (e.g., tundra communities). Warming decreased evenness at the local (alpha) scale, but increased evenness at the beta scale, indicating that replicate warming plots diverged in their abundance distribution over time. Warming changed the composition of plant communities, particularly through species turnover rather than in the nestedness component, suggesting that warming leads to novel species assemblages. Our study highlights that responses of terrestrial plant communities to warming depend on experimental methodology, environmental context, and the spatial grain of investigation.
气候变暖实验中尺度依赖性植物生物多样性变化的综合
气候变暖是地球上植物种群、群落和生态系统面临的最紧迫的环境挑战之一。增温实验是建立气候变化与植物多样性响应因果关系的重要工具。然而,这些实验的结果在方向和量级上各不相同。我们假设这种变化是由环境相关因素引起的,如温度操纵的程度、研究持续时间、分析的空间粒度、研究进行的背景气候以及所使用的生物多样性指标。在这里,我们提供了42个变暖实验的综合数据,主要来自冻土带和草原生态系统。我们研究了变暖如何影响植物的组成,以及在α(=样地)、β(=样地-样地)和γ(=站点)尺度上植物多样性的响应是如何变化的。背景相关因素解释了在不同研究中观察到的一些差异。升温幅度越大,α尺度上物种丰富度的下降幅度越大。实验变暖导致夏季背景温度较高的植物群落(如荒漠草原)的物种丰富度比夏季背景温度较低的植物群落(如苔原群落)的物种丰富度下降更强烈。增暖降低了局部(α)尺度上的均匀度,但增加了β尺度上的均匀度,表明重复增暖样地的丰度分布随时间而分化。变暖改变了植物群落的组成,特别是通过物种更替而不是筑巢成分,这表明变暖导致了新的物种组合。我们的研究强调了陆地植物群落对变暖的响应取决于实验方法、环境背景和调查的空间颗粒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书