Hemodynamic optimization of a novel single-puncture dual-lumen coaxial catheter for arteriovenous fistula access: A computational fluid dynamics study.

IF 0.9
Northern clinics of Istanbul Pub Date : 2026-09-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.14744/nci.2026.08522
Cemal Kocaaslan
{"title":"Hemodynamic optimization of a novel single-puncture dual-lumen coaxial catheter for arteriovenous fistula access: A computational fluid dynamics study.","authors":"Cemal Kocaaslan","doi":"10.14744/nci.2026.08522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the gold standard for hemodialysis access, but traditional dual-needle cannulation is limited by a restricted cannulation area and progressive stenosis; single-puncture systems may reduce these risks if hemodynamics can be optimized to prevent recirculation. This study aimed to design a novel single-puncture dual-lumen coaxial catheter and to evaluate its hemodynamic performance, flow efficiency, and recirculation rate using high-resolution computational fluid dynamics (CFD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this CFD and design-optimization study, a dual-lumen coaxial catheter with a unique fenestration geometry was designed and analyzed using SolidWorks Flow Simulation at a physiological temperature of 37°C. Boundary conditions included an AVF flow rate of 1000 mL/min and a dialysis pump speed of 300 mL/min. The primary endpoints were flow velocity, shear stress, and recirculation control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CFD simulation (1,030,641 cells) showed a maximum flow velocity of 12.69 m/s and a peak calculated shear stress of 2,602.45 Pa at the narrowest lumen section; because blood damage depends on both stress magnitude and exposure time, these computational data alone do not establish blood compatibility. Thermodilution analysis yielded a theoretical recirculation rate of 0.007% under the modeled conditions, and flow trajectories showed spatial separation of the venous jet from the arterial intake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under the modeled steady-state conditions (AVF flow, 1000 mL/min; dialysis pump flow, 300 mL/min), CFD predicted stable separation of the return and aspiration streams and a theoretical recirculation rate of 0.007%. These proof-of-concept findings support further geometric optimization and physical testing; they do not establish clinical safety, efficacy, or superiority over standard dual-needle cannulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94347,"journal":{"name":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","volume":"13 4","pages":"460-468"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13591039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2026.08522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the gold standard for hemodialysis access, but traditional dual-needle cannulation is limited by a restricted cannulation area and progressive stenosis; single-puncture systems may reduce these risks if hemodynamics can be optimized to prevent recirculation. This study aimed to design a novel single-puncture dual-lumen coaxial catheter and to evaluate its hemodynamic performance, flow efficiency, and recirculation rate using high-resolution computational fluid dynamics (CFD).

Methods: In this CFD and design-optimization study, a dual-lumen coaxial catheter with a unique fenestration geometry was designed and analyzed using SolidWorks Flow Simulation at a physiological temperature of 37°C. Boundary conditions included an AVF flow rate of 1000 mL/min and a dialysis pump speed of 300 mL/min. The primary endpoints were flow velocity, shear stress, and recirculation control.

Results: CFD simulation (1,030,641 cells) showed a maximum flow velocity of 12.69 m/s and a peak calculated shear stress of 2,602.45 Pa at the narrowest lumen section; because blood damage depends on both stress magnitude and exposure time, these computational data alone do not establish blood compatibility. Thermodilution analysis yielded a theoretical recirculation rate of 0.007% under the modeled conditions, and flow trajectories showed spatial separation of the venous jet from the arterial intake.

Conclusion: Under the modeled steady-state conditions (AVF flow, 1000 mL/min; dialysis pump flow, 300 mL/min), CFD predicted stable separation of the return and aspiration streams and a theoretical recirculation rate of 0.007%. These proof-of-concept findings support further geometric optimization and physical testing; they do not establish clinical safety, efficacy, or superiority over standard dual-needle cannulation.

一种新型单穿刺双腔同轴导管用于动静脉瘘的血流动力学优化:计算流体动力学研究。
目的:动静脉瘘(AVF)是血液透析通路的金标准,但传统的双针插管受狭窄的插管面积和进行性狭窄的限制;如果可以优化血流动力学以防止再循环,单次穿刺系统可能会降低这些风险。本研究旨在设计一种新型的单穿刺双腔同轴导管,并利用高分辨率计算流体动力学(CFD)对其血流动力学性能、流动效率和再循环速率进行评估。方法:在37℃生理温度下,采用SolidWorks Flow Simulation对具有独特开窗几何形状的双腔同轴导管进行了CFD和设计优化研究。边界条件为AVF流速为1000 mL/min,透析泵转速为300 mL/min。主要终点是流速、剪切应力和再循环控制。结果:CFD模拟(1,030,641个细胞)显示,在最窄的管腔截面处,最大流速为12.69 m/s,计算出的峰值剪切应力为2,602.45 Pa;由于血液损伤取决于应激强度和暴露时间,因此仅凭这些计算数据并不能确定血液相容性。热稀释分析显示,在模拟条件下,理论再循环率为0.007%,流动轨迹显示静脉射流与动脉入口的空间分离。结论:在模拟稳态条件下(AVF流量为1000 mL/min,透析泵流量为300 mL/min), CFD预测回流流和抽吸流分离稳定,理论再循环率为0.007%。这些概念验证的发现支持进一步的几何优化和物理测试;它们不能确定临床安全性、有效性或优于标准双针插管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书