Predictive value of an intraoperative gallbladder scoring system for surgical difficulty and post-operative outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

IF 0.9
Northern clinics of Istanbul Pub Date : 2026-08-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.14744/nci.2026.82609
Ahmet Baskent, Mehmet Furkan Baskent
{"title":"Predictive value of an intraoperative gallbladder scoring system for surgical difficulty and post-operative outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","authors":"Ahmet Baskent, Mehmet Furkan Baskent","doi":"10.14744/nci.2026.82609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard surgical treatment for gallbladder diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an intraoperative gallbladder scoring system in predicting surgical difficulty and perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing LC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 798 patients who underwent elective LC for cholecystopathy (symptomatic cholelithiasis, gallbladder polyps, and adenomyomatosis) performed by a single surgeon at our institution between March 2019 and February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, and predisposing factors were recorded. The degree of intraoperative gallbladder adhesions was graded on a scale from 0 to 4 operative time, drain usage, conversion to open surgery, and post-operative complications were evaluated. The relationship between the intraoperative gallbladder score and surgical outcomes was statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 51 years, and 61% were female. The intraoperative gallbladder score was 1 in 45.9% of patients, 2 in 26.3%, 3 in 15.1%, and 4 in 10.5%. Drain placement was required in 33.1% of cases. The conversion rate to open surgery was 2.1%. The post-operative complication rate was 1.1%. A statistically significant association was found between increasing intraoperative gallbladder scores and drain usage, post-operative complications, and conversion to open surgery (p<0.05). No significant association was observed between the intraoperative score and the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intraoperative gallbladder scoring system is a reliable and practical method for predicting surgical difficulty and adverse perioperative outcomes in LC. Its routine use may support surgical decision-making and improve patient safety and surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94347,"journal":{"name":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","volume":"13 4","pages":"395-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13591032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2026.82609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard surgical treatment for gallbladder diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an intraoperative gallbladder scoring system in predicting surgical difficulty and perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing LC.

Methods: A total of 798 patients who underwent elective LC for cholecystopathy (symptomatic cholelithiasis, gallbladder polyps, and adenomyomatosis) performed by a single surgeon at our institution between March 2019 and February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, and predisposing factors were recorded. The degree of intraoperative gallbladder adhesions was graded on a scale from 0 to 4 operative time, drain usage, conversion to open surgery, and post-operative complications were evaluated. The relationship between the intraoperative gallbladder score and surgical outcomes was statistically analyzed.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 51 years, and 61% were female. The intraoperative gallbladder score was 1 in 45.9% of patients, 2 in 26.3%, 3 in 15.1%, and 4 in 10.5%. Drain placement was required in 33.1% of cases. The conversion rate to open surgery was 2.1%. The post-operative complication rate was 1.1%. A statistically significant association was found between increasing intraoperative gallbladder scores and drain usage, post-operative complications, and conversion to open surgery (p<0.05). No significant association was observed between the intraoperative score and the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Conclusion: The intraoperative gallbladder scoring system is a reliable and practical method for predicting surgical difficulty and adverse perioperative outcomes in LC. Its routine use may support surgical decision-making and improve patient safety and surgical outcomes.

术中胆囊评分系统对腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术难度和术后预后的预测价值。
目的:腹腔镜胆囊切除术是胆囊疾病的金标准手术治疗方法。本研究旨在评估术中胆囊评分系统在预测LC患者手术难度和围手术期预后方面的有效性。方法:回顾性分析2019年3月至2024年2月期间由一名外科医生在我院接受胆囊病变(症状性胆石症、胆囊息肉和腺肌瘤病)选择性LC治疗的798例患者。记录患者的人口统计学特征、美国麻醉医师学会评分和诱发因素。术中胆囊粘连程度按0 ~ 4分进行分级,评估手术时间、引流液使用情况、转开腹手术及术后并发症。统计分析术中胆囊评分与手术结果的关系。结果:患者平均年龄51岁,女性占61%。术中胆囊评分为1分(45.9%),2分(26.3%),3分(15.1%),4分(10.5%)。33.1%的病例需要放置引流管。转换率为2.1%。术后并发症发生率为1.1%。术中胆囊评分增加与引流管使用率、术后并发症及转开腹手术之间存在统计学显著相关性(结论:术中胆囊评分系统是预测LC手术难度和围手术期不良结局的可靠实用方法。常规使用它可以支持手术决策,提高患者的安全性和手术效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书