Breathe Easier: Evaluating Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Rib Fracture Analgesia-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 0.8 0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Clara Alverina, Safina Fairuz Salwaa, Syaogi Ahmed 'Azizy, Pesta Parulian Maurid Edwar
{"title":"Breathe Easier: Evaluating Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Rib Fracture Analgesia-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Clara Alverina, Safina Fairuz Salwaa, Syaogi Ahmed 'Azizy, Pesta Parulian Maurid Edwar","doi":"10.4274/ThoracResPract.2026.2026-1-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rib fractures may cause severe pain that impairs ventilation, increases pulmonary complications, and lengthens hospitalization. Conventional analgesic techniques have several limitations, whereas the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) offers a simpler, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether SAPB improves pain control and reduces opioid use and hospitalization duration.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, Taylor & Francis, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was conducted to identify randomized and observational studies comparing SAPB with opioid-based analgesia or other regional blocks in patients with rib fracture pain. The primary outcome was pain severity visual analogue scale/numeric rating scale (VAS/NRS) at predefined time points, whereas opioid consumption and hospital length of stay (LOS) served as secondary outcomes. Given the variability of pain assessment scales across studies (NRS 0-10 and VAS 0-100), continuous outcomes were pooled as standardized mean differences (SMDs) using a random-effects model. Seven studies comprising 611 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis showed that baseline pain scores were broadly comparable between SAPB and comparators, with no statistically significant difference overall (baseline SMD: 0.18; <i>P</i> = 0.25) or within either subgroup. Compared with opioids, SAPB was associated with significantly lower pain scores at 3 hours (SMD: -0.40; <i>P</i> = 0.04) and, in the opioid subgroup, at 12 hours (SMD: -0.44; <i>P</i> = 0.002). Overall pooled estimates at 6, 12, and 24 hours did not reach statistical significance owing to substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> 87-96%). Compared with other regional blocks, SAPB was associated with higher pain scores at 6 hours (SMD: 0.85; <i>P</i> = 0.004), whereas the comparison at 24 hours was inconclusive, with the overall estimate not statistically significant (SMD: -0.76; <i>P</i> = 0.15). A pooled analysis also showed a significant reduction in opioid consumption with SAPB (SMD: -0.35; 95% confidence interval: -0.67 to -0.02; <i>P</i> = 0.04). Findings on hospital LOS were inconsistent across studies and remain inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, low-certainty evidence suggests that SAPB may provide effective and longer-lasting analgesia, reduce opioid requirements, and support respiratory function, indicating a potential role as an adjunct in the management of rib fracture pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2026.2026-1-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Rib fractures may cause severe pain that impairs ventilation, increases pulmonary complications, and lengthens hospitalization. Conventional analgesic techniques have several limitations, whereas the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) offers a simpler, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether SAPB improves pain control and reduces opioid use and hospitalization duration.

Material and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, Taylor & Francis, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was conducted to identify randomized and observational studies comparing SAPB with opioid-based analgesia or other regional blocks in patients with rib fracture pain. The primary outcome was pain severity visual analogue scale/numeric rating scale (VAS/NRS) at predefined time points, whereas opioid consumption and hospital length of stay (LOS) served as secondary outcomes. Given the variability of pain assessment scales across studies (NRS 0-10 and VAS 0-100), continuous outcomes were pooled as standardized mean differences (SMDs) using a random-effects model. Seven studies comprising 611 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis.

Results: The meta-analysis showed that baseline pain scores were broadly comparable between SAPB and comparators, with no statistically significant difference overall (baseline SMD: 0.18; P = 0.25) or within either subgroup. Compared with opioids, SAPB was associated with significantly lower pain scores at 3 hours (SMD: -0.40; P = 0.04) and, in the opioid subgroup, at 12 hours (SMD: -0.44; P = 0.002). Overall pooled estimates at 6, 12, and 24 hours did not reach statistical significance owing to substantial heterogeneity (I2 87-96%). Compared with other regional blocks, SAPB was associated with higher pain scores at 6 hours (SMD: 0.85; P = 0.004), whereas the comparison at 24 hours was inconclusive, with the overall estimate not statistically significant (SMD: -0.76; P = 0.15). A pooled analysis also showed a significant reduction in opioid consumption with SAPB (SMD: -0.35; 95% confidence interval: -0.67 to -0.02; P = 0.04). Findings on hospital LOS were inconsistent across studies and remain inconclusive.

Conclusion: Overall, low-certainty evidence suggests that SAPB may provide effective and longer-lasting analgesia, reduce opioid requirements, and support respiratory function, indicating a potential role as an adjunct in the management of rib fracture pain.

呼吸更轻松:评估锯肌前平面阻滞对肋骨骨折的镇痛作用-系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:肋骨骨折可引起严重疼痛,影响通气,增加肺部并发症,延长住院时间。传统的镇痛技术有一些局限性,而前锯肌阻滞(SAPB)提供了一种更简单的、超声引导的区域麻醉替代方案。本系统综述和荟萃分析研究了SAPB是否能改善疼痛控制,减少阿片类药物的使用和住院时间。材料和方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价和荟萃分析。对PubMed、Scopus、EBSCO、Taylor & Francis、Web of Science和ScienceDirect进行文献检索,以确定比较SAPB与阿片类药物镇痛或其他区域阻滞治疗肋骨骨折疼痛患者的随机观察性研究。主要结局是预先设定时间点的疼痛严重程度视觉模拟量表/数值评定量表(VAS/NRS),而阿片类药物消耗和住院时间(LOS)是次要结局。考虑到研究中疼痛评估量表的可变性(NRS 0-10和VAS 0-100),使用随机效应模型将连续结果汇总为标准化平均差异(SMDs)。包括611例患者的7项研究符合纳入标准并纳入分析。结果:荟萃分析显示,基线疼痛评分在SAPB和比较组之间具有广泛的可比性,总体上没有统计学上的显著差异(基线SMD: 0.18; P = 0.25)或在任何一个亚组内。与阿片类药物相比,SAPB在3小时(SMD: -0.40; P = 0.04)和阿片类药物亚组中,在12小时(SMD: -0.44; P = 0.002)显著降低疼痛评分。由于存在很大的异质性(i87 -96%), 6、12和24小时的总体汇总估计值没有达到统计学意义。与其他区域阻滞相比,SAPB与6小时较高的疼痛评分相关(SMD: 0.85; P = 0.004),而24小时的比较不确定,总体估计无统计学意义(SMD: -0.76; P = 0.15)。一项综合分析也显示SAPB组阿片类药物的消耗显著减少(SMD: -0.35; 95%可信区间:-0.67至-0.02;P = 0.04)。各研究对医院LOS的研究结果不一致,仍然没有定论。结论:总的来说,低确定性的证据表明SAPB可以提供有效和持久的镇痛,减少阿片类药物的需求,并支持呼吸功能,表明在肋骨骨折疼痛的治疗中有潜在的辅助作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书