Evidence Base for Positioning Electroconvulsive Therapy and Magnetic Seizure Therapy in Treatment Guidelines for Major Depressive Disorder.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Beyza Erdogan Akturk, Murat Ilhan Atagun
{"title":"Evidence Base for Positioning Electroconvulsive Therapy and Magnetic Seizure Therapy in Treatment Guidelines for Major Depressive Disorder.","authors":"Beyza Erdogan Akturk, Murat Ilhan Atagun","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized in a substantial proportion of patients by an inadequate response to standard pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions, thereby increasing the need for more rapid and potent biological treatments. In this context, convulsive neuromodulation therapies play a central clinical role, particularly in severe, psychotic, treatment-resistant, or life-threatening depressive states. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is regarded as one of the most effective biological interventions for the treatment of MDD, supported by decades of clinical experience and high-level evidence. Magnetic seizure therapy (MST), by contrast, aims to exert antidepressant effects through convulsive mechanisms similar to those of ECT and has attracted increasing interest due to its more focal cortical stimulation and its potential to offer a more favorable cognitive adverse-effect profile. In this review, ECT and MST in MDD are examined comparatively in light of the current evidence, with acute efficacy, cognitive safety, and use in special patient populations evaluated within an integrated framework. While the acute antidepressant efficacy and clinical predictability of ECT are supported at the highest level, MST appears to be a promising yet still experimental option, particularly in selected cases in which cognitive safety is prioritized. This review aims to clarify the position of ECT and MST within treatment algorithms for MDD and to support clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized in a substantial proportion of patients by an inadequate response to standard pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions, thereby increasing the need for more rapid and potent biological treatments. In this context, convulsive neuromodulation therapies play a central clinical role, particularly in severe, psychotic, treatment-resistant, or life-threatening depressive states. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is regarded as one of the most effective biological interventions for the treatment of MDD, supported by decades of clinical experience and high-level evidence. Magnetic seizure therapy (MST), by contrast, aims to exert antidepressant effects through convulsive mechanisms similar to those of ECT and has attracted increasing interest due to its more focal cortical stimulation and its potential to offer a more favorable cognitive adverse-effect profile. In this review, ECT and MST in MDD are examined comparatively in light of the current evidence, with acute efficacy, cognitive safety, and use in special patient populations evaluated within an integrated framework. While the acute antidepressant efficacy and clinical predictability of ECT are supported at the highest level, MST appears to be a promising yet still experimental option, particularly in selected cases in which cognitive safety is prioritized. This review aims to clarify the position of ECT and MST within treatment algorithms for MDD and to support clinical decision-making.

重度抑郁障碍治疗指南中定位电痉挛疗法和磁发作疗法的证据基础。
重度抑郁症(MDD)的特点是很大一部分患者对标准的药理学和心理治疗干预反应不足,因此增加了对更快速和更有效的生物治疗的需求。在这种情况下,抽搐神经调节疗法在临床中起着核心作用,特别是在严重的、精神病性的、治疗难治性的或危及生命的抑郁状态中。电痉挛疗法(ECT)被认为是治疗重度抑郁症最有效的生物干预措施之一,得到了数十年临床经验和高水平证据的支持。相比之下,磁癫痫治疗(MST)旨在通过类似于ECT的惊厥机制发挥抗抑郁作用,由于其更具局灶性的皮层刺激以及其提供更有利的认知不良反应的潜力,引起了越来越多的关注。在这篇综述中,根据目前的证据,比较检查了ECT和MST在MDD中的疗效,认知安全性,以及在综合框架内对特殊患者群体的使用进行了评估。虽然电痉挛疗法的急性抗抑郁疗效和临床可预测性在最高水平上得到了支持,但MST似乎是一种有希望但仍处于实验阶段的选择,特别是在认知安全优先的特定病例中。本综述旨在阐明ECT和MST在MDD治疗算法中的地位,并为临床决策提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ect
Journal of Ect 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书