Modeling Driver Adaptation Patterns During Remote Driving.

IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Xingjian Ma, Anthony D McDonald
{"title":"Modeling Driver Adaptation Patterns During Remote Driving.","authors":"Xingjian Ma, Anthony D McDonald","doi":"10.1177/00187208261490983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo identify driving maneuvers in remote driving under end-to-end latency and examine operator adaptation through within-session maneuver transitions.BackgroundRemote driving systems enable operators to control highly automated vehicles when systems encounter operational limits. End-to-end latency disrupts adaptation and vehicle control, although operators may adjust driving behavior. Research on within-session adaptation clusters and maneuvers emerging under latency remains limited.MethodThirty-six participants completed nine remote driving simulator sessions, navigating construction zones under end-to-end latencies (0-640 ms). Hidden Markov Models identified driving maneuvers from vehicle control data (speed, steering, throttle). Dynamic time warping and K-means clustering classified drives by maneuver-transition sequences. Chi-square tests and ANOVAs examined associations among adaptation clusters, participant-specific differences, experimental conditions, and human-factors measures, while participant-clustered factorial analysis examined maneuver composition.ResultsFour maneuvers (adapted, transitional, overcompensation, and compensatory) and three adaptation clusters (No adaptation, Rapid adaptation, and Gradual adaptation) emerged. Adaptation clusters were associated with participant-specific differences rather than latency conditions or repeated trials. Rapid adaptation drives were associated with lower workload and higher trust than No adaptation drives and showed a trend toward increasing trust, whereas trust significantly declined in No adaptation cluster.ConclusionRemote driving operators exhibit adaptation clusters characterized by maneuver-transition sequences. Transitional maneuvers reveal intermediate stages. Cluster distributions were more strongly associated with participant-specific differences than tested experimental conditions, with adaptation patterns differing in trust and workload.ApplicationTraining programs should assess adaptation capabilities and provide interventions rather than uniform protocols. Early cluster identification enables training on maneuver transitions that facilitate progression toward adaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"187208261490983"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261490983","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo identify driving maneuvers in remote driving under end-to-end latency and examine operator adaptation through within-session maneuver transitions.BackgroundRemote driving systems enable operators to control highly automated vehicles when systems encounter operational limits. End-to-end latency disrupts adaptation and vehicle control, although operators may adjust driving behavior. Research on within-session adaptation clusters and maneuvers emerging under latency remains limited.MethodThirty-six participants completed nine remote driving simulator sessions, navigating construction zones under end-to-end latencies (0-640 ms). Hidden Markov Models identified driving maneuvers from vehicle control data (speed, steering, throttle). Dynamic time warping and K-means clustering classified drives by maneuver-transition sequences. Chi-square tests and ANOVAs examined associations among adaptation clusters, participant-specific differences, experimental conditions, and human-factors measures, while participant-clustered factorial analysis examined maneuver composition.ResultsFour maneuvers (adapted, transitional, overcompensation, and compensatory) and three adaptation clusters (No adaptation, Rapid adaptation, and Gradual adaptation) emerged. Adaptation clusters were associated with participant-specific differences rather than latency conditions or repeated trials. Rapid adaptation drives were associated with lower workload and higher trust than No adaptation drives and showed a trend toward increasing trust, whereas trust significantly declined in No adaptation cluster.ConclusionRemote driving operators exhibit adaptation clusters characterized by maneuver-transition sequences. Transitional maneuvers reveal intermediate stages. Cluster distributions were more strongly associated with participant-specific differences than tested experimental conditions, with adaptation patterns differing in trust and workload.ApplicationTraining programs should assess adaptation capabilities and provide interventions rather than uniform protocols. Early cluster identification enables training on maneuver transitions that facilitate progression toward adaptation.

远程驾驶过程中驾驶员适应模式建模。
目的识别端到端延迟远程驾驶中的驾驶机动,并通过会话内机动转换检验驾驶员的适应性。远程驾驶系统使操作人员能够在系统遇到操作限制时控制高度自动化的车辆。端到端延迟会破坏自适应和车辆控制,尽管操作员可能会调整驾驶行为。对会话内适应集群和延迟下出现的机动的研究仍然有限。方法36名参与者完成9个远程驾驶模拟器会话,在端到端延迟(0-640 ms)下导航建筑区域。隐马尔可夫模型从车辆控制数据(速度、转向、油门)中识别驾驶动作。动态时间规整和k均值聚类对机动转移序列的驱动进行分类。卡方检验和方差分析检验了适应聚类、参与者特异性差异、实验条件和人为因素测量之间的关联,而参与者聚类析因分析检验了机动组成。结果出现了适应性、过渡性、过度补偿和补偿性4种适应策略和无适应、快速适应和渐进适应3种适应集群。适应集群与参与者的特异性差异有关,而与潜伏期条件或重复试验无关。快速适应驱动比无适应驱动具有更低的工作量和更高的信任,并有增加信任的趋势,而无适应驱动集群的信任显著下降。结论远程驾驶驾驶员表现出以机动转换序列为特征的适应集群。过渡动作揭示了中间阶段。与测试的实验条件相比,聚类分布与参与者特异性差异的关联更强,适应模式在信任和工作量方面存在差异。应用培训项目应该评估适应能力并提供干预措施,而不是统一的协议。早期的聚类识别使机动转换训练能够促进向适应的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书