The EHDS Regulation: Health Data at the Crossroads of Patient Autonomy, Data Protection, and Innovation.

IF 1.3 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Elisabeth Steindl
{"title":"The EHDS Regulation: Health Data at the Crossroads of Patient Autonomy, Data Protection, and Innovation.","authors":"Elisabeth Steindl","doi":"10.1017/jme.2026.10284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digitalization and data-driven research are widely recognized as key drivers of innovation in healthcare, with the potential to improve clinical outcomes, accelerate research, and support evidence-based policymaking. Nevertheless, across jurisdictions, obstacles such as fragmented data governance, limited interoperability, and tensions between data protection and data reuse continue to hinder the effective use of health data. The Regulation on the European Health Data Space (Regulation (EU) 2025/327) represents a significant shift in EU health data governance. It seeks to create a single European market for health data by introducing harmonized rules, shared technical standards, and new institutional structures, while simultaneously reinforcing patients' rights, access to their data, and control over its use. This paper aims to provide a clear and systematic account of the Regulation for a broad international and interdisciplinary audience. It situates the legal piece within its broader political and legal context, highlighting the factors that shaped its design and providing a comprehensive analysis of its core concepts. Using the patient opt-out regime as a case study, the paper critically examines the enduring tensions between safeguarding fundamental rights, ensuring patient autonomy, and fostering innovation and economic objectives, all while accommodating national preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2026.10284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digitalization and data-driven research are widely recognized as key drivers of innovation in healthcare, with the potential to improve clinical outcomes, accelerate research, and support evidence-based policymaking. Nevertheless, across jurisdictions, obstacles such as fragmented data governance, limited interoperability, and tensions between data protection and data reuse continue to hinder the effective use of health data. The Regulation on the European Health Data Space (Regulation (EU) 2025/327) represents a significant shift in EU health data governance. It seeks to create a single European market for health data by introducing harmonized rules, shared technical standards, and new institutional structures, while simultaneously reinforcing patients' rights, access to their data, and control over its use. This paper aims to provide a clear and systematic account of the Regulation for a broad international and interdisciplinary audience. It situates the legal piece within its broader political and legal context, highlighting the factors that shaped its design and providing a comprehensive analysis of its core concepts. Using the patient opt-out regime as a case study, the paper critically examines the enduring tensions between safeguarding fundamental rights, ensuring patient autonomy, and fostering innovation and economic objectives, all while accommodating national preferences.

EHDS法规:处于患者自主、数据保护和创新十字路口的健康数据。
数字化和数据驱动的研究被广泛认为是医疗保健创新的关键驱动因素,具有改善临床结果、加速研究和支持循证决策的潜力。然而,在各个司法管辖区,数据治理碎片化、互操作性有限以及数据保护和数据重用之间的紧张关系等障碍继续阻碍着卫生数据的有效利用。《欧洲卫生数据空间条例》(条例(EU) 2025/327)代表了欧盟卫生数据治理的重大转变。它力求通过引入统一的规则、共享的技术标准和新的体制结构,为卫生数据创建一个单一的欧洲市场,同时加强患者的权利、对其数据的获取和对其使用的控制。本文旨在为广泛的国际和跨学科受众提供关于该法规的清晰和系统的说明。它将法律作品置于更广泛的政治和法律背景下,突出塑造其设计的因素,并对其核心概念进行全面分析。本文以患者选择退出制度为案例研究,批判性地审视了维护基本权利、确保患者自主权、促进创新和经济目标之间持久的紧张关系,同时也适应了国家的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Material published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (JLME) contributes to the educational mission of The American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, covering public health, health disparities, patient safety and quality of care, and biomedical science and research. It provides articles on such timely topics as health care quality and access, managed care, pain relief, genetics, child/maternal health, reproductive health, informed consent, assisted dying, ethics committees, HIV/AIDS, and public health. Symposium issues review significant policy developments, health law court decisions, and books.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书