Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of Point-of-Care Echocardiography for Early Detection of Neonatal Cardiac Lesions: A Systematic Review

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Komal Mushtaq, Muhammad Talha Javeed
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of Point-of-Care Echocardiography for Early Detection of Neonatal Cardiac Lesions: A Systematic Review","authors":"Komal Mushtaq,&nbsp;Muhammad Talha Javeed","doi":"10.1111/echo.70617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Congenital heart disease (CHD) remains a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a significant proportion of cases remaining undetected before birth. While pediatric cardiologist-performed echocardiography represents the diagnostic gold standard, access to specialist services is limited across many neonatal care settings globally. Neonatologist-performed point-of-care echocardiography has emerged as a bedside diagnostic tool; however, the evidence supporting its diagnostic performance and clinical impact requires systematic evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To systematically review the diagnostic performance and clinical impact of point-of-care echocardiography performed by neonatologists or trained non-cardiologist clinicians for the early detection of cardiac lesions in neonates across diverse clinical settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted in April 2026, supplemented by reference list screening of all included studies (198 additional records screened), forward citation searches (32 additional records), and a supplementary Embase search conducted in August 2026 in response to peer review. Studies evaluating neonatologist-performed echocardiography in neonates aged 0–28 days, reporting diagnostic performance metrics or clinical impact outcomes with a cardiologist comparator or confirmed diagnosis as reference standard, were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Due to substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively in accordance with PRISMA 2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirteen primary studies (2008–2026, including two ahead-of-print articles) from eleven countries encompassing over 31 800 neonates were included and synthesized across three domains: diagnostic performance and agreement, CHD detection capability, and clinical impact. Concordance between neonatologist and cardiologist echocardiography ranged from 91.15% to 97.9% (kappa 0.68–0.862). One population-based screening study reported sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 99.6%. No cases of missed major or critical CHD were reported in the included studies, although evidence remains limited and predominantly retrospective. Neonatologist-performed echocardiography was associated with management changes in 48%–66% of consultations involving structural or mixed cardiac assessment, and in up to 79% of consultations addressing hemodynamic indications alone (patent ductus arteriosus, pulmonary hypertension, systemic hypotension). Formal diagnostic accuracy data were limited to one study, and heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Current evidence supports moderate-to-high diagnostic agreement and potential clinical utility of neonatologist-performed point-of-care echocardiography for identifying major and critical neonatal cardiac lesions. Evidence suggests this modality may be most appropriately utilized as an initial bedside triage and rule-in tool in settings where immediate pediatric cardiology access is limited. However, robust diagnostic accuracy data remain limited, and high-quality prospective multicenter validation studies are urgently required before definitive conclusions can be drawn.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50558,"journal":{"name":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","volume":"43 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/echo.70617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Congenital heart disease (CHD) remains a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a significant proportion of cases remaining undetected before birth. While pediatric cardiologist-performed echocardiography represents the diagnostic gold standard, access to specialist services is limited across many neonatal care settings globally. Neonatologist-performed point-of-care echocardiography has emerged as a bedside diagnostic tool; however, the evidence supporting its diagnostic performance and clinical impact requires systematic evaluation.

Objective

To systematically review the diagnostic performance and clinical impact of point-of-care echocardiography performed by neonatologists or trained non-cardiologist clinicians for the early detection of cardiac lesions in neonates across diverse clinical settings.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted in April 2026, supplemented by reference list screening of all included studies (198 additional records screened), forward citation searches (32 additional records), and a supplementary Embase search conducted in August 2026 in response to peer review. Studies evaluating neonatologist-performed echocardiography in neonates aged 0–28 days, reporting diagnostic performance metrics or clinical impact outcomes with a cardiologist comparator or confirmed diagnosis as reference standard, were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Due to substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively in accordance with PRISMA 2020.

Results

Thirteen primary studies (2008–2026, including two ahead-of-print articles) from eleven countries encompassing over 31 800 neonates were included and synthesized across three domains: diagnostic performance and agreement, CHD detection capability, and clinical impact. Concordance between neonatologist and cardiologist echocardiography ranged from 91.15% to 97.9% (kappa 0.68–0.862). One population-based screening study reported sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 99.6%. No cases of missed major or critical CHD were reported in the included studies, although evidence remains limited and predominantly retrospective. Neonatologist-performed echocardiography was associated with management changes in 48%–66% of consultations involving structural or mixed cardiac assessment, and in up to 79% of consultations addressing hemodynamic indications alone (patent ductus arteriosus, pulmonary hypertension, systemic hypotension). Formal diagnostic accuracy data were limited to one study, and heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis.

Conclusion

Current evidence supports moderate-to-high diagnostic agreement and potential clinical utility of neonatologist-performed point-of-care echocardiography for identifying major and critical neonatal cardiac lesions. Evidence suggests this modality may be most appropriately utilized as an initial bedside triage and rule-in tool in settings where immediate pediatric cardiology access is limited. However, robust diagnostic accuracy data remain limited, and high-quality prospective multicenter validation studies are urgently required before definitive conclusions can be drawn.

即时超声心动图对新生儿心脏病变早期检测的诊断性能和临床影响:一项系统综述。
背景:先天性心脏病(CHD)仍然是全世界新生儿发病和死亡的主要原因,很大一部分病例在出生前未被发现。虽然儿科心脏病专家进行的超声心动图是诊断的金标准,但在全球许多新生儿护理机构中,获得专家服务的机会有限。新生儿医师进行的即时超声心动图已经成为一种床边诊断工具;然而,支持其诊断性能和临床影响的证据需要系统评估。目的:系统回顾由新生儿医生或经过培训的非心脏病专家临床医生进行的即时超声心动图的诊断性能和临床影响,以便在不同的临床环境中早期发现新生儿心脏病变。方法:于2026年4月对PubMed和谷歌Scholar进行了系统检索,并对所有纳入的研究进行了参考文献列表筛选(筛选了198条附加记录),转发引文检索(32条附加记录),并于2026年8月根据同行评议进行了Embase补充检索。研究评估了0-28天新生儿的新生儿超声心动图,报告了诊断性能指标或临床影响结果与心脏病专家比较或确诊诊断作为参考标准。使用QUADAS-2工具评估方法学质量。由于大量临床和方法学的异质性,研究结果根据PRISMA 2020进行叙述性综合。结果:来自11个国家的13项主要研究(2008-2026年,包括两篇出版前的文章)纳入并综合了三个领域:诊断性能和一致性、冠心病检测能力和临床影响。新生儿超声心动图与心内科超声心动图的一致性为91.15% ~ 97.9% (kappa 0.68 ~ 0.862)。一项基于人群的筛查研究报告灵敏度为92%,特异性为99.6%。在纳入的研究中,虽然证据仍然有限且主要是回顾性的,但没有报告遗漏的主要或严重冠心病病例。新生儿超声心动图与48%-66%的涉及结构性或混合心脏评估的会诊以及高达79%的仅涉及血流动力学适应症(动脉导管未闭、肺动脉高压、全身性低血压)的会诊的管理改变有关。正式的诊断准确性数据仅限于一项研究,异质性妨碍了meta分析。结论:目前的证据支持中度至高度的诊断一致性和潜在的临床应用,新生儿医师进行的即时超声心动图识别主要和危急的新生儿心脏病变。有证据表明,这种方式可能最适合作为最初的床边分诊和规则的工具,在设置中,立即获得儿科心脏病学是有限的。然而,可靠的诊断准确性数据仍然有限,在得出明确结论之前,迫切需要高质量的前瞻性多中心验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Echocardiography: A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques is the official publication of the International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound. Widely recognized for its comprehensive peer-reviewed articles, case studies, original research, and reviews by international authors. Echocardiography keeps its readership of echocardiographers, ultrasound specialists, and cardiologists well informed of the latest developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书