[Psychopharmacological treatment of mentally ill offenders : A sample survey of forensic psychiatric patients admitted to two forensic psychiatric facilities in Hesse].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
N Erlacher, B Eusterschulte, S Krimmer, C Culmsee, M Hahn
{"title":"[Psychopharmacological treatment of mentally ill offenders : A sample survey of forensic psychiatric patients admitted to two forensic psychiatric facilities in Hesse].","authors":"N Erlacher, B Eusterschulte, S Krimmer, C Culmsee, M Hahn","doi":"10.1007/s00115-026-02015-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many studies on psychopharmacological treatments in general psychiatric care exist, but only few are addressing the psychopharmacological treatment of mentally ill offenders.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A sample survey was conducted at the Vitos Forensic Psychiatric Hospitals Gießen and Haina. Demographic, forensic, and pharmacological data were collected (nondigital patient files). All current inpatients were included. The primary objective of the study was a description of the pharmacological care of forensic patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 416 forensic psychiatric patients were analyzed. More than half of the patients (55.05%) obtained psychopharmacological polypharmacy (use of ≥ 2 psychotropic drugs), the majority of which resulted from antipsychotic polypharmacy (37.7%). The most commonly combined agents were two second generation antipsychotics. Among the antipsychotics, olanzapine was prescribed most frequently (17.8%) and used in most cases (19/34) at off-label dosages. Clozapine was combined most often (11.5%) with other psychotropic drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The therapeutic advantage of combinations of psychotropic drugs compared to monotherapy is not sufficiently supported by clinical evidence. The therapeutic advantage of combination therapies compared with monotherapy is not sufficiently established for psychopharmacotherapy in general, and for antipsychotic treatment in particular. However, the high prevalence of psychopharmacological polypharmacy in this study reflects routine clinical practice in forensic psychiatry. Further analyses are meaningful to evaluate specific substance combinations in terms of drug safety and off-label use.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-026-02015-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many studies on psychopharmacological treatments in general psychiatric care exist, but only few are addressing the psychopharmacological treatment of mentally ill offenders.

Study design: A sample survey was conducted at the Vitos Forensic Psychiatric Hospitals Gießen and Haina. Demographic, forensic, and pharmacological data were collected (nondigital patient files). All current inpatients were included. The primary objective of the study was a description of the pharmacological care of forensic patients.

Results: Data from 416 forensic psychiatric patients were analyzed. More than half of the patients (55.05%) obtained psychopharmacological polypharmacy (use of ≥ 2 psychotropic drugs), the majority of which resulted from antipsychotic polypharmacy (37.7%). The most commonly combined agents were two second generation antipsychotics. Among the antipsychotics, olanzapine was prescribed most frequently (17.8%) and used in most cases (19/34) at off-label dosages. Clozapine was combined most often (11.5%) with other psychotropic drugs.

Conclusion: The therapeutic advantage of combinations of psychotropic drugs compared to monotherapy is not sufficiently supported by clinical evidence. The therapeutic advantage of combination therapies compared with monotherapy is not sufficiently established for psychopharmacotherapy in general, and for antipsychotic treatment in particular. However, the high prevalence of psychopharmacological polypharmacy in this study reflects routine clinical practice in forensic psychiatry. Further analyses are meaningful to evaluate specific substance combinations in terms of drug safety and off-label use.

[精神病罪犯的精神药理学治疗:黑森州两家法医精神病机构收治的法医精神病患者样本调查]。
背景:关于精神科普通护理中的精神药理学治疗的研究很多,但针对精神疾病罪犯的精神药理学治疗的研究很少。研究设计:在吉ßen和海纳的Vitos法医精神病医院进行抽样调查。收集了人口统计学、法医和药理学数据(非数字患者档案)。所有目前住院的病人都包括在内。本研究的主要目的是描述法医病人的药理学护理。结果:对416例法医精神病患者资料进行分析。超过一半(55.05%)的患者获得了精神药理学上的综合用药(使用≥ 2种精神药物),其中以抗精神病药物为主(37.7%)。最常见的联合用药是两种第二代抗精神病药物。在抗精神病药物中,使用频率最高的是奥氮平(17.8%),大多数病例(19/34)使用超说明书剂量。氯氮平与其他精神药物合用最多(11.5%)。结论:精神药物联合治疗较单一治疗的优势并没有充分的临床证据支持。联合治疗与单一治疗相比的治疗优势在一般精神药物治疗中,特别是抗精神病药物治疗中还没有充分确立。然而,在本研究中,精神药理学的高流行率反映了法医精神病学的常规临床实践。进一步的分析对于评估药物安全性和超说明书使用方面的特定物质组合具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书