Pharmacological human augmentation, fatigue management and spatial disorientation training during distant air operations: lessons learned from the wars in Iran.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ivan Gur, Sharon Itzchakov, Idan Nakdimon
{"title":"Pharmacological human augmentation, fatigue management and spatial disorientation training during distant air operations: lessons learned from the wars in Iran.","authors":"Ivan Gur, Sharon Itzchakov, Idan Nakdimon","doi":"10.1136/military-2026-003430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Military aviation in distant operations increases aircrew fatigue and the risk of human-factor-related safety incidents. This study evaluated the impact of different fatigue management and pharmacological human augmentation approaches on flight safety and, in a separate analysis, the effect of prior spatial disorientation (SD) simulator training on in-flight SD severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed human-factor-related safety incidents in the Israeli Air Force across three operational periods: Operation 'Iron Swords' (short-range, lower-tempo), 'Rising Lion' (12-day long-range, high-tempo) and 'Epic Fury' (42-day extended-duration, high-tempo). The primary outcome was the normalised rate of safety incidents per flight hour. Secondary outcomes included the normalised utilisation of caffeine and modafinil and the severity of SD events among trained versus untrained aircrew.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the three periods, 949 incidents were reported. Normalised incident rates and severity distributions remained stable between 'Rising Lion' and 'Epic Fury', despite the latter's significantly greater flight volume. The fighter fleet, the only platform to fully implement preplanned, individualised flight-and-rest scheduling and personalised stimulant prescriptions, was also the only platform to demonstrate a decrease in normalised incident rates (r=-0.82, p=0.004). Aircrew who had never undergone SD simulator training sustained significantly more severe SD events than previously trained aircrew (p=0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing individualised physiological envelopes-combining personalised pharmacological augmentation with structured rest-was associated with stable or reduced in-flight safety incident rates during sustained, high-tempo operations. Additionally, prior SD simulator training was associated with a decreased level of severity of SD events.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2026-003430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Military aviation in distant operations increases aircrew fatigue and the risk of human-factor-related safety incidents. This study evaluated the impact of different fatigue management and pharmacological human augmentation approaches on flight safety and, in a separate analysis, the effect of prior spatial disorientation (SD) simulator training on in-flight SD severity.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed human-factor-related safety incidents in the Israeli Air Force across three operational periods: Operation 'Iron Swords' (short-range, lower-tempo), 'Rising Lion' (12-day long-range, high-tempo) and 'Epic Fury' (42-day extended-duration, high-tempo). The primary outcome was the normalised rate of safety incidents per flight hour. Secondary outcomes included the normalised utilisation of caffeine and modafinil and the severity of SD events among trained versus untrained aircrew.

Results: Across the three periods, 949 incidents were reported. Normalised incident rates and severity distributions remained stable between 'Rising Lion' and 'Epic Fury', despite the latter's significantly greater flight volume. The fighter fleet, the only platform to fully implement preplanned, individualised flight-and-rest scheduling and personalised stimulant prescriptions, was also the only platform to demonstrate a decrease in normalised incident rates (r=-0.82, p=0.004). Aircrew who had never undergone SD simulator training sustained significantly more severe SD events than previously trained aircrew (p=0.015).

Conclusions: Implementing individualised physiological envelopes-combining personalised pharmacological augmentation with structured rest-was associated with stable or reduced in-flight safety incident rates during sustained, high-tempo operations. Additionally, prior SD simulator training was associated with a decreased level of severity of SD events.

远距离空中作战中的人体增强药物、疲劳管理和空间定向障碍训练:从伊朗战争中吸取的教训。
背景:远程作战中的军事航空增加了机组人员的疲劳和与人为因素相关的安全事件的风险。本研究评估了不同的疲劳管理和人体药物增强方法对飞行安全的影响,并在一项单独的分析中,评估了先前的空间定向障碍(SD)模拟器训练对飞行中SD严重程度的影响。方法:我们回顾性地回顾了以色列空军在三个作战时期的人为因素相关安全事件:“铁剑”行动(短程、低节奏)、“崛起的狮子”行动(12天的远程、高节奏)和“史诗之怒”行动(42天的长时间、高节奏)。主要结果是每飞行小时安全事故的正常化率。次要结果包括咖啡因和莫达非尼的正常使用情况以及训练有素的机组人员与未训练有素的机组人员之间SD事件的严重程度。结果:在这三个时期,报告了949起事件。尽管“崛起狮子”和“史诗之怒”的航运量明显更大,但“崛起狮子”和“史诗之怒”之间的标准化事故率和严重程度分布保持稳定。战斗机机队是唯一一个全面实施预先计划、个性化飞行和休息计划以及个性化兴奋剂处方的平台,也是唯一一个显示正常事故率下降的平台(r=-0.82, p=0.004)。从未接受过SD模拟器训练的机组人员比之前接受过培训的机组人员发生更严重的SD事件(p=0.015)。结论:实施个体化生理包络——将个体化药物增强与有组织的休息相结合——与持续、高节奏操作中稳定或降低飞行安全事发率有关。此外,先前的SD模拟器训练与SD事件严重程度的降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书