Teaching staff as gatekeepers for student mental health in higher education: findings from an exploratory sequential mixed-methods study on mental health promotion, psychological crises, and stigma.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Maria Koschig, Michéle Müller, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Ines Conrad
{"title":"Teaching staff as gatekeepers for student mental health in higher education: findings from an exploratory sequential mixed-methods study on mental health promotion, psychological crises, and stigma.","authors":"Maria Koschig, Michéle Müller, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Ines Conrad","doi":"10.1186/s13033-026-00738-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental health problems among university students are highly prevalent, while stigma and limited help-seeking remain major barriers to support utilization. Teaching staff can act as important gatekeepers who recognise distress, encourage help-seeking, and contribute to psychologically supportive learning environments. However, their role in student mental health promotion remains insufficiently understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This exploratory sequential mixed-methods study combined a qualitative focus group involving five students from two German universities and an anonymous online survey of teaching staff from four German higher education institutions (n = 187). Insights from the focus group informed the development and content of the subsequent survey of teaching staff. Qualitative data were analysed using structured content analysis according to Kuckartz. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics and assessment of stigma-related attitudes using the Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale Short Form (SSMIS-SF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative findings revealed four interrelated areas of expectation: psychologically sensitive communication, mental health literacy among teaching staff, accessible institutional support structures, and a university culture that normalises help-seeking. Among teaching staff, only 30.9% considered student mental health promotion part of their formal professional role, while 45.8% reported uncertainty when interacting with students experiencing psychological crises. Qualitative findings indicated substantial variation in perceived preparedness and support practices. Teaching staff primarily described recognising distress, offering initial support, and referring students to professional services. Personal endorsement of stigmatizing beliefs was low, whereas perceived public stigma was significantly higher (mean difference = 12.42, 95% CI 11.02-13.83; t(131) = 17.51, p < .001; Cohen's d = 1.52, 95% CI 1.27-1.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Teaching staff may represent important gatekeepers for student mental health. However, unclear role expectations, limited institutional guidance, and insufficient training may restrict their capacity to support students effectively. Universities should strengthen staff training, establish clear referral pathways, and implement institution-wide mental health strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13591750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-026-00738-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mental health problems among university students are highly prevalent, while stigma and limited help-seeking remain major barriers to support utilization. Teaching staff can act as important gatekeepers who recognise distress, encourage help-seeking, and contribute to psychologically supportive learning environments. However, their role in student mental health promotion remains insufficiently understood.

Methods: This exploratory sequential mixed-methods study combined a qualitative focus group involving five students from two German universities and an anonymous online survey of teaching staff from four German higher education institutions (n = 187). Insights from the focus group informed the development and content of the subsequent survey of teaching staff. Qualitative data were analysed using structured content analysis according to Kuckartz. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics and assessment of stigma-related attitudes using the Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale Short Form (SSMIS-SF).

Results: The qualitative findings revealed four interrelated areas of expectation: psychologically sensitive communication, mental health literacy among teaching staff, accessible institutional support structures, and a university culture that normalises help-seeking. Among teaching staff, only 30.9% considered student mental health promotion part of their formal professional role, while 45.8% reported uncertainty when interacting with students experiencing psychological crises. Qualitative findings indicated substantial variation in perceived preparedness and support practices. Teaching staff primarily described recognising distress, offering initial support, and referring students to professional services. Personal endorsement of stigmatizing beliefs was low, whereas perceived public stigma was significantly higher (mean difference = 12.42, 95% CI 11.02-13.83; t(131) = 17.51, p < .001; Cohen's d = 1.52, 95% CI 1.27-1.77).

Conclusions: Teaching staff may represent important gatekeepers for student mental health. However, unclear role expectations, limited institutional guidance, and insufficient training may restrict their capacity to support students effectively. Universities should strengthen staff training, establish clear referral pathways, and implement institution-wide mental health strategies.

高等教育中教师作为学生心理健康的看门人:一项关于心理健康促进、心理危机和污名化的探索性顺序混合方法研究的结果
背景:大学生心理健康问题非常普遍,而耻辱感和寻求帮助有限仍然是支持利用的主要障碍。教学人员可以作为重要的看门人,识别痛苦,鼓励寻求帮助,并为心理支持的学习环境做出贡献。然而,他们在促进学生心理健康方面的作用仍然没有得到充分的了解。方法:本探索性顺序混合方法研究结合定性焦点小组,包括来自两所德国大学的五名学生,以及来自四所德国高等教育机构的教师匿名在线调查(n = 187)。焦点小组的见解为后续教学人员调查的发展和内容提供了信息。根据Kuckartz的理论,采用结构化内容分析法对定性数据进行分析。定量分析包括描述性统计和使用精神疾病自我污名量表(SSMIS-SF)评估污名相关态度。结果:定性研究结果揭示了四个相互关联的期望领域:心理敏感的沟通,教师的心理健康素养,可访问的机构支持结构,以及正常化寻求帮助的大学文化。在教师中,只有30.9%的人认为促进学生心理健康是他们正式职业角色的一部分,而45.8%的人在与遭遇心理危机的学生互动时表示不确定。定性调查结果表明,在感知准备和支持实践方面存在重大差异。教学人员主要描述了识别困扰,提供初步支持,并将学生转介给专业服务。个体对污名化信念的认同度较低,而感知到的公共污名化信念明显较高(平均差异= 12.42,95% CI 11.02-13.83; t(131) = 17.51, p < .001;Cohen’s d = 1.52, 95% CI 1.27-1.77)。结论:教师可能是学生心理健康的重要看门人。然而,不明确的角色期望、有限的制度指导和培训不足可能会限制他们有效支持学生的能力。大学应加强员工培训,建立明确的转诊途径,并在全校范围内实施心理健康战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书