Relevance of existing blood-based biomarkers for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective case-control study.

Q3 Medicine
Journal of Circulating Biomarkers Pub Date : 2026-09-18 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.33393/jcb.2026.3774
Mohammed Farouk, Kunkumabalasubramanian Sreedurgalakshmi, Jeyanthi Rebecca
{"title":"Relevance of existing blood-based biomarkers for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective case-control study.","authors":"Mohammed Farouk, Kunkumabalasubramanian Sreedurgalakshmi, Jeyanthi Rebecca","doi":"10.33393/jcb.2026.3774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of conventional blood-based biomarkers for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective case-control study, adults with CLD (with and without HCC) underwent blood sampling for alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP), and cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Diagnostic performance was assessed individually and in combination using regression analyses, with radiological imaging as the reference standard. Pre- and post-treatment biomarker levels were analyzed in a subset of HCC patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 453 analyzed participants (131 HCC, 322 non-HCC controls), AUROCs for AFP, DCP, and cfDNA were 0.84, 0.76, and 0.64, respectively. At Youden index-derived thresholds, sensitivities were 62% for AFP, 65% for DCP, and 59% for cfDNA, with corresponding specificities of 93%, 74%, and 64%. Combining biomarkers via regression models did not improve diagnostic performance. AFP demonstrated poor sensitivity (32%) for early-stage HCC detection, and performance varied by disease etiology. Among treatment response markers, DCP showed superior potential.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a real-world CLD cohort, conventional blood-based biomarkers demonstrate limited sensitivity for early-stage HCC detection. These findings highlight the need for molecular and genetic approaches to improve early HCC diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":37524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Circulating Biomarkers","volume":"15 ","pages":"58-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13592045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Circulating Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/jcb.2026.3774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of conventional blood-based biomarkers for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD).

Methods: In this prospective case-control study, adults with CLD (with and without HCC) underwent blood sampling for alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP), and cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Diagnostic performance was assessed individually and in combination using regression analyses, with radiological imaging as the reference standard. Pre- and post-treatment biomarker levels were analyzed in a subset of HCC patients.

Results: Among 453 analyzed participants (131 HCC, 322 non-HCC controls), AUROCs for AFP, DCP, and cfDNA were 0.84, 0.76, and 0.64, respectively. At Youden index-derived thresholds, sensitivities were 62% for AFP, 65% for DCP, and 59% for cfDNA, with corresponding specificities of 93%, 74%, and 64%. Combining biomarkers via regression models did not improve diagnostic performance. AFP demonstrated poor sensitivity (32%) for early-stage HCC detection, and performance varied by disease etiology. Among treatment response markers, DCP showed superior potential.

Conclusion: In a real-world CLD cohort, conventional blood-based biomarkers demonstrate limited sensitivity for early-stage HCC detection. These findings highlight the need for molecular and genetic approaches to improve early HCC diagnosis.

现有血液生物标志物检测肝细胞癌的相关性:一项前瞻性病例对照研究。
本研究评估了传统血液生物标志物在慢性肝病(CLD)患者肝细胞癌(HCC)检测中的诊断性能。方法:在这项前瞻性病例对照研究中,成年CLD患者(伴或不伴HCC)接受了甲胎蛋白(AFP)、去γ -羧基凝血酶原(DCP)和游离DNA (cfDNA)的血液采样。以放射成像为参考标准,单独评估诊断表现,并结合回归分析进行评估。在一组HCC患者中分析治疗前和治疗后的生物标志物水平。结果:在分析的453名参与者中(131名HCC, 322名非HCC对照),AFP、DCP和cfDNA的auroc分别为0.84、0.76和0.64。在约登指数衍生的阈值下,AFP的敏感性为62%,DCP为65%,cfDNA为59%,相应的特异性为93%,74%和64%。通过回归模型结合生物标志物并不能提高诊断效果。AFP对早期HCC检测的敏感性较差(32%),其表现因疾病病因而异。在治疗反应指标中,DCP表现出较强的潜力。结论:在现实世界的CLD队列中,传统的基于血液的生物标志物对早期HCC检测的敏感性有限。这些发现强调需要分子和遗传学方法来改善HCC的早期诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Circulating Biomarkers
Journal of Circulating Biomarkers Medicine-Biochemistry (medical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Circulating Biomarkers is an international, peer-reviewed, open access scientific journal focusing on all aspects of the rapidly growing field of circulating blood-based biomarkers and diagnostics using circulating protein and lipid markers, circulating tumor cells (CTC), circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and extracellular vesicles, including exosomes, microvesicles, microparticles, ectosomes and apoptotic bodies. The journal publishes high-impact articles that deal with all fields related to circulating biomarkers and diagnostics, ranging from basic science to translational and clinical applications. Papers from a wide variety of disciplines are welcome; interdisciplinary studies are especially suitable for this journal. Included within the scope are a broad array of specialties including (but not limited to) cancer, immunology, neurology, metabolic diseases, cardiovascular medicine, regenerative medicine, nosology, physiology, pathology, technological applications in diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccine, drug delivery, regenerative medicine, drug development and clinical trials. The journal also hosts reviews, perspectives and news on specific topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书