Digging into the Roots of the Problem: Advancing Trans-inclusive Perinatal Healthcare Through Indigenous Knowledge and Decolonising Practice.

IF 1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
George Parker, Elizabeth Kerekere, Fleur Kelsey, Alex Ker, Katie Graham, Chelsea R DʼCruz, Edward Hyde, Eddy Grant, Jaimie Veale, Sara Filoche
{"title":"Digging into the Roots of the Problem: Advancing Trans-inclusive Perinatal Healthcare Through Indigenous Knowledge and Decolonising Practice.","authors":"George Parker, Elizabeth Kerekere, Fleur Kelsey, Alex Ker, Katie Graham, Chelsea R DʼCruz, Edward Hyde, Eddy Grant, Jaimie Veale, Sara Filoche","doi":"10.1007/s10912-026-10062-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dismantling matrixes of domination that contribute to health inequities for queer and trans people requires acknowledging and attending to all of the oppressive structures which shape health outcomes. Within the context of colonised countries like Aotearoa New Zealand, this means attending to the role that colonisation and Eurocentric views of gender and sexuality play in queer and trans peoples' experiences of marginalisation within healthcare. In this paper we argue that intersectional decolonising approaches to gender and sexuality are central to transforming trans inclusion within healthcare settings. We demonstrate this through drawing on examples from Warming the Whare, a 3-year participatory action research project focused on increasing trans inclusion within perinatal mental health services by centring Te Whare Takatāpui-an Indigenous health and wellbeing framework. Our research practices demonstrate how Indigenous knowledge can be centred within trans-inclusive work to attend to the root causes of marginalisation and harm resulting from colonisation. The examples from our practices illustrate the importance of relational research partnerships, intersectional research teams and being accountable for our research practice as necessary ways to get to these root causes of harm. We do not present ourselves as perfect examples of decolonising research practice; instead, we position ourselves as taking up the call for continued learning and reflection that drives decolonising practice in research. We present our work as an example of what queer medical humanities might offer the broader discipline of medical humanities, calling for innovation, intersectionality and changes that centre and support the humanisation of healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":45518,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-026-10062-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dismantling matrixes of domination that contribute to health inequities for queer and trans people requires acknowledging and attending to all of the oppressive structures which shape health outcomes. Within the context of colonised countries like Aotearoa New Zealand, this means attending to the role that colonisation and Eurocentric views of gender and sexuality play in queer and trans peoples' experiences of marginalisation within healthcare. In this paper we argue that intersectional decolonising approaches to gender and sexuality are central to transforming trans inclusion within healthcare settings. We demonstrate this through drawing on examples from Warming the Whare, a 3-year participatory action research project focused on increasing trans inclusion within perinatal mental health services by centring Te Whare Takatāpui-an Indigenous health and wellbeing framework. Our research practices demonstrate how Indigenous knowledge can be centred within trans-inclusive work to attend to the root causes of marginalisation and harm resulting from colonisation. The examples from our practices illustrate the importance of relational research partnerships, intersectional research teams and being accountable for our research practice as necessary ways to get to these root causes of harm. We do not present ourselves as perfect examples of decolonising research practice; instead, we position ourselves as taking up the call for continued learning and reflection that drives decolonising practice in research. We present our work as an example of what queer medical humanities might offer the broader discipline of medical humanities, calling for innovation, intersectionality and changes that centre and support the humanisation of healthcare.

挖掘问题的根源:通过土著知识和非殖民化实践推进跨包容性围产期保健。
拆除导致酷儿和变性人健康不平等的统治矩阵需要承认和关注所有影响健康结果的压迫性结构。在像新西兰这样的殖民国家的背景下,这意味着要关注殖民和以欧洲为中心的性别和性观念在酷儿和变性人在医疗保健领域被边缘化的经历中所扮演的角色。在本文中,我们认为,交叉非殖民化的方法,以性别和性是核心的转变跨性别包容在医疗保健设置。这是一个为期三年的参与性行动研究项目,其重点是通过以Whare Takatāpui-an土著健康和福利框架为中心,在围产期心理健康服务中增加跨性别包容。我们的研究实践表明,如何将土著知识集中在跨包容性工作中,以解决殖民化造成的边缘化和伤害的根本原因。我们实践中的例子说明了关系研究伙伴关系、交叉研究团队和对我们的研究实践负责的重要性,这是找到这些危害根源的必要途径。我们并没有把自己描绘成非殖民化研究实践的完美典范;相反,我们将自己定位为接受持续学习和反思的呼吁,推动研究中的非殖民化实践。我们将我们的工作作为酷儿医学人文学科可能提供更广泛的医学人文学科的一个例子,呼吁创新,交叉性和改变,以支持医疗保健的人性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Humanities
Journal of Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Humanities publishes original papers that reflect its enlarged focus on interdisciplinary inquiry in medicine and medical education. Such inquiry can emerge in the following ways: (1) from the medical humanities, which includes literature, history, philosophy, and bioethics as well as those areas of the social and behavioral sciences that have strong humanistic traditions; (2) from cultural studies, a multidisciplinary activity involving the humanities; women''s, African-American, and other critical studies; media studies and popular culture; and sociology and anthropology, which can be used to examine medical institutions, practice and education with a special focus on relations of power; and (3) from pedagogical perspectives that elucidate what and how knowledge is made and valued in medicine, how that knowledge is expressed and transmitted, and the ideological basis of medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书