Investigating the effects of pine biochar on intake and digestibility in beef steers consuming forage.

IF 1.9 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2026-09-03 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txag134
Emily C Fowler, Sabrina Fortunatti, Merritt L Drewery
{"title":"Investigating the effects of pine biochar on intake and digestibility in beef steers consuming forage.","authors":"Emily C Fowler, Sabrina Fortunatti, Merritt L Drewery","doi":"10.1093/tas/txag134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biochar is a charcoal-like material made from burned organic material of agricultural or forestry biomass. Pyrolysis, the primary method of biochar production, is achieved in limited oxygen conditions which allows the thermally altered biomass to retain most of its carbon. Biochar has potential to enhance soil health and sequester carbon in soils, but must be mixed with an organic material, such as urine or manure, to maximize effectiveness. Feeding biochar to cattle allows them to deposit biochar-enriched manure onto pasture without human intervention while simultaneously receiving any potential benefits associated with consumption. The objective of this study was to evaluate diet utilization in beef steers fed one of four treatments in addition to a basal forage diet: no biochar (CON), or a pinewood-based biochar provided at 0.8%, 1.6%, or 2.4% of the previous 3-d forage intake. Four ruminally cannulated steers were utilized in a 4 × 4 Latin square with four 14-d periods, consisting of an 8-d treatment adaptation (d 1 to 8), fecal and diet sampling for intake and digestibility (d 9 to 13) and rumen fluid sampling (d 14). Steers had ad libitum access to hay and water and were offered treatments once daily mixed with cottonseed meal provided at 125 mg N/kg BW. Statistical analyses employed orthogonal contrasts with fixed effects of treatment and period and a random effect of steer. There was a tendency for biochar to linearly affect (<i>P</i> = 0.08) forage organic matter intake (FOMI) where FOMI was 5.23 kg/d for CON, 4.96 kg/d for 0.8% biochar, 4.52 kg/d for 1.6% biochar, and 4.54 kg/d for 2.4% biochar. There was also a linear trend (<i>P</i> = 0.08) for total digestible organic matter intake (TDOMI) where CON steers consumed the most TDOMI (4.29 kg/d) and steers receiving 2.4% biochar consumed the least (3.53 kg/d). There were no linear (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.11) or quadratic effects (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.31) of biochar inclusion on measures of digestibility; organic matter digestibility averaged 64.6% across treatments. Our observations suggest that pinewood derived biochar supplemented from 0.8% to 2.4% of intake did not significantly affect diet utilization, but the tendencies and numerical depressions observed suggest moderate (1.6%) and high (2.4%) doses of biochar may have practical concerns. However, there were methodological limitations that affected our ability to draw definitive conclusions, and further research is necessary to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"10 ","pages":"txag134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13591484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txag134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biochar is a charcoal-like material made from burned organic material of agricultural or forestry biomass. Pyrolysis, the primary method of biochar production, is achieved in limited oxygen conditions which allows the thermally altered biomass to retain most of its carbon. Biochar has potential to enhance soil health and sequester carbon in soils, but must be mixed with an organic material, such as urine or manure, to maximize effectiveness. Feeding biochar to cattle allows them to deposit biochar-enriched manure onto pasture without human intervention while simultaneously receiving any potential benefits associated with consumption. The objective of this study was to evaluate diet utilization in beef steers fed one of four treatments in addition to a basal forage diet: no biochar (CON), or a pinewood-based biochar provided at 0.8%, 1.6%, or 2.4% of the previous 3-d forage intake. Four ruminally cannulated steers were utilized in a 4 × 4 Latin square with four 14-d periods, consisting of an 8-d treatment adaptation (d 1 to 8), fecal and diet sampling for intake and digestibility (d 9 to 13) and rumen fluid sampling (d 14). Steers had ad libitum access to hay and water and were offered treatments once daily mixed with cottonseed meal provided at 125 mg N/kg BW. Statistical analyses employed orthogonal contrasts with fixed effects of treatment and period and a random effect of steer. There was a tendency for biochar to linearly affect (P = 0.08) forage organic matter intake (FOMI) where FOMI was 5.23 kg/d for CON, 4.96 kg/d for 0.8% biochar, 4.52 kg/d for 1.6% biochar, and 4.54 kg/d for 2.4% biochar. There was also a linear trend (P = 0.08) for total digestible organic matter intake (TDOMI) where CON steers consumed the most TDOMI (4.29 kg/d) and steers receiving 2.4% biochar consumed the least (3.53 kg/d). There were no linear (P ≥ 0.11) or quadratic effects (P ≥ 0.31) of biochar inclusion on measures of digestibility; organic matter digestibility averaged 64.6% across treatments. Our observations suggest that pinewood derived biochar supplemented from 0.8% to 2.4% of intake did not significantly affect diet utilization, but the tendencies and numerical depressions observed suggest moderate (1.6%) and high (2.4%) doses of biochar may have practical concerns. However, there were methodological limitations that affected our ability to draw definitive conclusions, and further research is necessary to confirm these findings.

研究松木生物炭对肉牛采食量和消化率的影响。
生物炭是一种由农业或林业生物质中燃烧的有机材料制成的类似木炭的材料。热解是生产生物炭的主要方法,是在有限的氧气条件下实现的,这使得热改变的生物质保留了大部分的碳。生物炭有增强土壤健康和固碳的潜力,但必须与有机物质混合,如尿液或粪便,以最大限度地提高效果。给牛喂生物炭可以让它们在没有人为干预的情况下将富含生物炭的粪便沉积到牧场上,同时还能获得与消费相关的任何潜在好处。本研究的目的是评估在基础饲料饲粮基础上饲喂四种处理之一的肉牛的日粮利用率:不添加生物炭(CON),或在之前的三维饲料摄入量的0.8%,1.6%或2.4%的水平上添加松木基生物炭。4头瘤胃灌管的阉牛在4 × 4拉丁方试验中进行4期试验,共14天,包括8天的处理适应期(第1 ~ 8天)、粪便和日粮的摄入和消化率取样(第9 ~ 13天)和瘤胃液取样(第14天)。阉牛可自由取用干草和水,每天1次与按125 mg N/kg BW添加的棉籽粕混合饲喂。统计分析采用正交对比,治疗和时间的固定效应和引导的随机效应。生物炭对饲料有机质采食量(FOMI)有线性影响的趋势(P = 0.08),其中CON组为5.23 kg/d, 0.8%组为4.96 kg/d, 1.6%组为4.52 kg/d, 2.4%组为4.54 kg/d。总可消化有机质采食量(TDOMI)也呈线性趋势(P = 0.08),其中CON组消耗的TDOMI最多(4.29 kg/d),而饲喂2.4%生物炭组消耗的TDOMI最少(3.53 kg/d)。生物炭包合物对消化率无线性(P≥0.11)或二次效应(P≥0.31);各处理有机物消化率平均为64.6%。我们的观察表明,松木衍生生物炭在摄入量中添加0.8%至2.4%对饲料利用率没有显著影响,但观察到的趋势和数值下降表明,中等(1.6%)和高(2.4%)剂量的生物炭可能存在实际问题。然而,方法上的局限性影响了我们得出明确结论的能力,需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书