Learning to Expect Less: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study of Prediction Errors, Reward Anticipation, and Negative Symptoms in Daily Lives of People with Schizophrenia.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Matthias Pillny, Dilge N Durlanik, Tania M Lincoln, Matteo Cella, Til Wykes, Clementine J Edwards
{"title":"Learning to Expect Less: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study of Prediction Errors, Reward Anticipation, and Negative Symptoms in Daily Lives of People with Schizophrenia.","authors":"Matthias Pillny, Dilge N Durlanik, Tania M Lincoln, Matteo Cella, Til Wykes, Clementine J Edwards","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbag125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypotheses: </strong>The brain continuously generates predictions about future experiences. When outcomes deviate from expectations, positive (+RPE) and negative (-RPE) reward prediction errors recalibrate predictions. Neuroimaging evidence indicates that amotivation in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSD) is linked to blunted processing of +RPEs. Yet the nature of RPEs and their processing in the everyday lives of people with SSD remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This preregistered analysis pooled data from two studies (N = 147; SSD = 68, healthy controls [HC] = 79) to quantify daily-life +RPEs and -RPEs and test their association with subsequent updating of anticipatory pleasure. Participants completed six days of ecological momentary assessment capturing current and anticipated pleasure. +RPEs were defined as EMA assessments in which current pleasure exceeded anticipated pleasure at the previous prompt, -RPEs were defined as occasions in which current pleasure fell short of prior anticipation. Linear mixed-effects models tested group differences in RPE frequency and magnitude; time-lagged models assessed updating of anticipatory pleasure.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Individuals with SSD reported fewer +RPEs (β = -0.05, p = .025), with no group difference in -RPEs or RPE magnitude. Within SSD, higher baseline amotivation was associated with smaller +RPEs (β = -0.08, p = .019). Time-lagged analyses revealed that in SSD, larger +RPEs predicted reduced subsequent anticipatory pleasure (β = -.171, p < .001), unlike in HCs (β = -.038, p = .26).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings indicate that in everyday life, individuals with SSD experience fewer positive surprises and show maladaptive updating of reward expectations, potentially driving negative symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":"52 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13592776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbag125","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and hypotheses: The brain continuously generates predictions about future experiences. When outcomes deviate from expectations, positive (+RPE) and negative (-RPE) reward prediction errors recalibrate predictions. Neuroimaging evidence indicates that amotivation in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSD) is linked to blunted processing of +RPEs. Yet the nature of RPEs and their processing in the everyday lives of people with SSD remains unknown.

Study design: This preregistered analysis pooled data from two studies (N = 147; SSD = 68, healthy controls [HC] = 79) to quantify daily-life +RPEs and -RPEs and test their association with subsequent updating of anticipatory pleasure. Participants completed six days of ecological momentary assessment capturing current and anticipated pleasure. +RPEs were defined as EMA assessments in which current pleasure exceeded anticipated pleasure at the previous prompt, -RPEs were defined as occasions in which current pleasure fell short of prior anticipation. Linear mixed-effects models tested group differences in RPE frequency and magnitude; time-lagged models assessed updating of anticipatory pleasure.

Study results: Individuals with SSD reported fewer +RPEs (β = -0.05, p = .025), with no group difference in -RPEs or RPE magnitude. Within SSD, higher baseline amotivation was associated with smaller +RPEs (β = -0.08, p = .019). Time-lagged analyses revealed that in SSD, larger +RPEs predicted reduced subsequent anticipatory pleasure (β = -.171, p < .001), unlike in HCs (β = -.038, p = .26).

Conclusions: Findings indicate that in everyday life, individuals with SSD experience fewer positive surprises and show maladaptive updating of reward expectations, potentially driving negative symptoms.

学会少期待:精神分裂症患者日常生活中预测错误、奖励预期和阴性症状的生态瞬间评估研究
背景和假设:大脑不断产生对未来经历的预测。当结果偏离预期时,正(+RPE)和负(-RPE)奖励预测误差重新校准预测。神经影像学证据表明,精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)的动机与+ rpe加工的钝化有关。然而,rpe的性质及其在SSD患者日常生活中的处理仍然未知。研究设计:这项预先登记的分析汇总了两项研究(N = 147; SSD = 68,健康对照[HC] = 79)的数据,以量化日常生活+ rpe和- rpe,并测试它们与随后更新的预期愉悦的关联。参与者完成了为期六天的生态瞬间评估,捕捉当前和预期的快乐。+ rpe被定义为当前愉悦度超过预期愉悦度的EMA评估,- rpe被定义为当前愉悦度低于先前预期的场合。线性混合效应模型检验了RPE频率和幅度的组间差异;时间滞后模型评估了预期快乐的更新。研究结果:SSD患者报告的+RPE较少(β = -0.05, p = 0.025),组间-RPE和RPE大小无差异。在SSD中,较高的基线动机与较小的rpe相关(β = -0.08, p = 0.019)。滞后分析显示,在SSD中,较大的+ rpe预测随后的预期愉悦减少(β = - 0.171, p < .001),与hc不同(β = - 0.038, p = .26)。结论:研究结果表明,在日常生活中,患有SSD的个体经历较少的积极惊喜,并且表现出奖励预期的不适应更新,这可能会导致负面症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Schizophrenia Bulletin 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Schizophrenia Bulletin seeks to review recent developments and empirically based hypotheses regarding the etiology and treatment of schizophrenia. We view the field as broad and deep, and will publish new knowledge ranging from the molecular basis to social and cultural factors. We will give new emphasis to translational reports which simultaneously highlight basic neurobiological mechanisms and clinical manifestations. Some of the Bulletin content is invited as special features or manuscripts organized as a theme by special guest editors. Most pages of the Bulletin are devoted to unsolicited manuscripts of high quality that report original data or where we can provide a special venue for a major study or workshop report. Supplement issues are sometimes provided for manuscripts reporting from a recent conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书