Nicholas Clarke, Lucy Hayden, Alan Smith, Linda Sharp, Christian von Wagner, Therese Mooney, Pamela Gallagher
{"title":"A Qualitative Exploration of the Decision Not to Take Part in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Women Living in Lower Socio-Economic Areas.","authors":"Nicholas Clarke, Lucy Hayden, Alan Smith, Linda Sharp, Christian von Wagner, Therese Mooney, Pamela Gallagher","doi":"10.1002/pon.70600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Organized colorectal (CRC) screening programmes offer an opportunity to reduce the burden of the disease on populations. CRC screening participation among women is substantially lower than breast or cervical cancer screening. Uptake is also lower in areas of greater deprivation which could exacerbate inequalities in CRC; however, few studies have been conducted with women resident in lower socio-economic areas who were invited for screening but did not participate. The aim of this study was to explore women's decisions not to take part in Ireland's population-based BowelScreen programme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with women resident in lower socio-economic areas, who had not participated in BowelScreen. Deductive thematic analysis, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF: 14 domain version), using the framework approach was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen women from lower socio-economic areas in Ireland who had not participated in BowelScreen were interviewed. Six TDF domains were identified as influencing non-participation; (1) Environmental Context and Resources; stressful life events and lack of healthcare professional recommendations, (2) Memory, Attention and Decision Making; delayed decision making and deciding screening is not personally relevant, (3) Knowledge; poor knowledge negating need for screening, (4) Emotions; disgust, embarrassment and fear, (5) Skills; low self-efficacy and instruction complexity, and (6) Social influence; did not encourage testing or was overridden by emotion and poor knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Greater consideration should be given to the targeting of interventions towards specific determinants of non-participation within subgroups of the population, in particular non-participant women living within lower socio-economic areas. Tackling environmental stressors, emotional factors, lack of healthcare professional support and the perception that feeling healthy equates with not needing screening could help improve CRC screening uptake among women living in low socioeconomic areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"35 9","pages":"e70600"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13595476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70600","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Organized colorectal (CRC) screening programmes offer an opportunity to reduce the burden of the disease on populations. CRC screening participation among women is substantially lower than breast or cervical cancer screening. Uptake is also lower in areas of greater deprivation which could exacerbate inequalities in CRC; however, few studies have been conducted with women resident in lower socio-economic areas who were invited for screening but did not participate. The aim of this study was to explore women's decisions not to take part in Ireland's population-based BowelScreen programme.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with women resident in lower socio-economic areas, who had not participated in BowelScreen. Deductive thematic analysis, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF: 14 domain version), using the framework approach was conducted.
Results: Fifteen women from lower socio-economic areas in Ireland who had not participated in BowelScreen were interviewed. Six TDF domains were identified as influencing non-participation; (1) Environmental Context and Resources; stressful life events and lack of healthcare professional recommendations, (2) Memory, Attention and Decision Making; delayed decision making and deciding screening is not personally relevant, (3) Knowledge; poor knowledge negating need for screening, (4) Emotions; disgust, embarrassment and fear, (5) Skills; low self-efficacy and instruction complexity, and (6) Social influence; did not encourage testing or was overridden by emotion and poor knowledge.
Conclusions: Greater consideration should be given to the targeting of interventions towards specific determinants of non-participation within subgroups of the population, in particular non-participant women living within lower socio-economic areas. Tackling environmental stressors, emotional factors, lack of healthcare professional support and the perception that feeling healthy equates with not needing screening could help improve CRC screening uptake among women living in low socioeconomic areas.
期刊介绍:
Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology.
This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues.
Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.