Pae Sun Suh, Jinna Kim, Dong Eon Kim, Kyunghwa Han, Kyung Hwan Kim, Hye Ryun Kim, Sun Och Yoon, Yoon Woo Koh
求助PDF
{"title":"Reliability and Validity of Imaging-derived Extranodal Extension Grading Using CT and MRI in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.","authors":"Pae Sun Suh, Jinna Kim, Dong Eon Kim, Kyunghwa Han, Kyung Hwan Kim, Hye Ryun Kim, Sun Och Yoon, Yoon Woo Koh","doi":"10.1148/radiol.260053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Imaging-derived extranodal extension (iENE) was added to the N3 criteria for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the ninth version of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system. Purpose To evaluate the reliability and prognostic value of a proposed joint task force iENE grading system in NPC. Materials and Methods This retrospective single-center study included patients with NPC treated between January 2007 and March 2025. For patients with cervical lymph node metastases, three radiologists independently graded iENE at pretreatment CT and/or MRI using the proposed four-tier classification system. Inter- and intrarater reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted κ. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, local-regional recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were evaluated across iENE grades using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, T and M categories, and chemotherapy status. Results A total of 401 patients (median age, 52 years [IQR, 44-60 years]; 296 male patients) were included. According to the consensus-based final iENE grades, 223, 36, 94, and 48 patients were classified as having iENE grade 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Interrater reliability (ICC, 0.87 [95% CI: 0.85, 0.89]) and intrarater reliability (κ = 0.95) for iENE grading were excellent. Compared with patients with iENE grade 0, patients with iENE grade 3 had shorter OS (hazard ratio, 3.30 [95% CI: 1.70, 6.41]; <i>P</i> < .001). In addition, patients with iENE grade 1, 2, and 3 had shorter DMFS than patients with iENE grade 0, with hazard ratios of 2.33 (95% CI: 1.12, 4.87; <i>P</i> = .02), 2.11 (95% CI: 1.24, 3.60; <i>P</i> = .006), and 2.39 (95% CI: 1.28, 4.45; <i>P</i> = .006), respectively. There was no evidence of a difference in prognostic performance between the TNM-8 and TNM-9 systems. Conclusion The joint task force iENE grading system had excellent reliability and good prognostic value in patients with NPC. © RSNA, 2026 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"320 3","pages":"e260053"},"PeriodicalIF":17.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.260053","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Background Imaging-derived extranodal extension (iENE) was added to the N3 criteria for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the ninth version of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system. Purpose To evaluate the reliability and prognostic value of a proposed joint task force iENE grading system in NPC. Materials and Methods This retrospective single-center study included patients with NPC treated between January 2007 and March 2025. For patients with cervical lymph node metastases, three radiologists independently graded iENE at pretreatment CT and/or MRI using the proposed four-tier classification system. Inter- and intrarater reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted κ. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, local-regional recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were evaluated across iENE grades using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, T and M categories, and chemotherapy status. Results A total of 401 patients (median age, 52 years [IQR, 44-60 years]; 296 male patients) were included. According to the consensus-based final iENE grades, 223, 36, 94, and 48 patients were classified as having iENE grade 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Interrater reliability (ICC, 0.87 [95% CI: 0.85, 0.89]) and intrarater reliability (κ = 0.95) for iENE grading were excellent. Compared with patients with iENE grade 0, patients with iENE grade 3 had shorter OS (hazard ratio, 3.30 [95% CI: 1.70, 6.41]; P < .001). In addition, patients with iENE grade 1, 2, and 3 had shorter DMFS than patients with iENE grade 0, with hazard ratios of 2.33 (95% CI: 1.12, 4.87; P = .02), 2.11 (95% CI: 1.24, 3.60; P = .006), and 2.39 (95% CI: 1.28, 4.45; P = .006), respectively. There was no evidence of a difference in prognostic performance between the TNM-8 and TNM-9 systems. Conclusion The joint task force iENE grading system had excellent reliability and good prognostic value in patients with NPC. © RSNA, 2026 Supplemental material is available for this article.
CT和MRI对鼻咽癌结外扩展分级的可靠性和有效性。
在第九版肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分期系统中,鼻咽癌(NPC)的N3标准中增加了影像学衍生的结外延伸(iENE)。目的评价联合工作组iENE分级系统在鼻咽癌中的可靠性和预后价值。材料和方法本回顾性单中心研究纳入2007年1月至2025年3月期间接受鼻咽癌治疗的患者。对于颈部淋巴结转移的患者,三位放射科医生在预处理CT和/或MRI中使用拟议的四级分类系统对iENE进行独立分级。采用类内相关系数(ICC)和加权κ来评估组间和组内信度。使用Kaplan-Meier和多变量Cox回归分析评估iENE分级患者的总生存期(OS)、无病生存期、局部-区域无复发生存期和远端无转移生存期(DMFS),并对年龄、性别、T和M类别以及化疗状态进行校正。结果共纳入401例患者,中位年龄52岁[IQR, 44-60岁],其中男性296例。根据基于共识的最终iENE分级,分别有223、36、94和48例患者被划分为iENE 0级、1级、2级和3级。iENE分级的量表间信度(ICC, 0.87 [95% CI: 0.85, 0.89])和量表内信度(κ = 0.95)均为优秀。与iENE 0级患者相比,iENE 3级患者的OS较短(风险比3.30 [95% CI: 1.70, 6.41]; P < .001)。此外,iENE 1级、2级和3级患者的DMFS短于iENE 0级患者,风险比分别为2.33 (95% CI: 1.12、4.87;P = 0.02)、2.11 (95% CI: 1.24、3.60;P = 0.006)和2.39 (95% CI: 1.28、4.45;P = 0.006)。没有证据表明TNM-8和TNM-9系统在预后表现上存在差异。结论联合工作组iENE分级系统对鼻咽癌患者具有良好的可靠性和预后价值。©RSNA, 2026本文提供补充材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。