Proposal for a new standard area diagram to quantify the severity of orange rust in sugarcane.

IF 2.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Maria Roselane Alves Oliveira, Humberson Rocha Silva, Willams José Oliveira, Djalma Euzébio Simões Neto, Adriano Francis Dorigan, Felipe Dalla Lana, André Angelo Medeiros Gomes
{"title":"Proposal for a new standard area diagram to quantify the severity of orange rust in sugarcane.","authors":"Maria Roselane Alves Oliveira, Humberson Rocha Silva, Willams José Oliveira, Djalma Euzébio Simões Neto, Adriano Francis Dorigan, Felipe Dalla Lana, André Angelo Medeiros Gomes","doi":"10.1094/PDIS-08-26-1550-SR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orange rust (Puccinia kuehnii), a fungal disease of major concern in the sugarcane industry, can reduce the productivity of susceptible sugarcane varieties by up to 50% in many sugarcane-producing countries. The use of a standard area diagram (SAD) enhances the assessment of rust severity, improving the accuracy and consistency of disease quantification by evaluators. The present study aimed to develop and validate a new SAD for assessing the severity of orange rust in sugarcane. The SAD was constructed from symptomatic leaves collected in the field, with severity levels of 0, 1.5, 3.8, 7.3, 12.9, 20.7, 31.5, 44.4, and 63.2%. Validation was conducted with 30 evaluators with no prior experience, divided into two groups of 15. Disease severity was estimated from 100 leaf images, initially without the use of a SAD and subsequently with the aid of a SAD. One group used the proposed SAD, while the other used an old SAD for orange rust assessment. The proposed SAD reduced inter-evaluator variability, showed lower systematic bias, and had narrower limits of agreement, although Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC, ρc) remained low, suggesting that factors beyond the SAD itself - such as the intrinsic complexity of orange rust symptoms and evaluator-related factors - may influence visual assessment accuracy. Analysis of bias parameters showed significant reductions in location (u) and scale (v) biases, indicating higher reproducibility and accuracy of the proposed SAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":20063,"journal":{"name":"Plant disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant disease","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-08-26-1550-SR","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orange rust (Puccinia kuehnii), a fungal disease of major concern in the sugarcane industry, can reduce the productivity of susceptible sugarcane varieties by up to 50% in many sugarcane-producing countries. The use of a standard area diagram (SAD) enhances the assessment of rust severity, improving the accuracy and consistency of disease quantification by evaluators. The present study aimed to develop and validate a new SAD for assessing the severity of orange rust in sugarcane. The SAD was constructed from symptomatic leaves collected in the field, with severity levels of 0, 1.5, 3.8, 7.3, 12.9, 20.7, 31.5, 44.4, and 63.2%. Validation was conducted with 30 evaluators with no prior experience, divided into two groups of 15. Disease severity was estimated from 100 leaf images, initially without the use of a SAD and subsequently with the aid of a SAD. One group used the proposed SAD, while the other used an old SAD for orange rust assessment. The proposed SAD reduced inter-evaluator variability, showed lower systematic bias, and had narrower limits of agreement, although Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC, ρc) remained low, suggesting that factors beyond the SAD itself - such as the intrinsic complexity of orange rust symptoms and evaluator-related factors - may influence visual assessment accuracy. Analysis of bias parameters showed significant reductions in location (u) and scale (v) biases, indicating higher reproducibility and accuracy of the proposed SAD.

提出一种新的标准面积图来量化甘蔗桔锈的严重程度。
橙锈病是甘蔗工业主要关注的一种真菌病,在许多甘蔗生产国,它可使易感甘蔗品种的生产率降低高达50%。标准面积图(SAD)的使用增强了对锈病严重程度的评估,提高了评估人员对疾病量化的准确性和一致性。本研究旨在开发和验证一种新的用于评估甘蔗桔锈严重程度的SAD。SAD是用田间采集的有症状叶片构建的,严重程度分别为0、1.5、3.8、7.3、12.9、20.7、31.5、44.4和63.2%。验证由30名没有先前经验的评估者进行,分为两组,每组15人。从100张叶子图像中估计疾病严重程度,最初没有使用SAD,随后使用SAD。一组使用建议的SAD,而另一组使用旧的SAD进行橙锈评估。虽然Lin的一致性相关系数(CCC, ρc)仍然很低,但提出的SAD减少了评估者之间的变异,显示出较低的系统偏差,并且具有较窄的一致性限制,这表明SAD本身之外的因素-例如橙锈症状的内在复杂性和评估者相关因素-可能影响视觉评估的准确性。偏倚参数分析显示,位置(u)和尺度(v)偏倚显著降低,表明所提出的SAD具有更高的再现性和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant disease
Plant disease 农林科学-植物科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1993
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Plant Disease is the leading international journal for rapid reporting of research on new, emerging, and established plant diseases. The journal publishes papers that describe basic and applied research focusing on practical aspects of disease diagnosis, development, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书