Effect of probiotic supplementation on psychological stress in healthy adults with moderate stress levels: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Rebecca F Slykerman, Naomi Davies, Christopher Frampton, Bertram Fong, Imad Al Kassaa, James Dekker, Shalome Bassett
{"title":"Effect of probiotic supplementation on psychological stress in healthy adults with moderate stress levels: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Rebecca F Slykerman, Naomi Davies, Christopher Frampton, Bertram Fong, Imad Al Kassaa, James Dekker, Shalome Bassett","doi":"10.1080/1028415X.2026.2729710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Psychological stress is increasingly linked to gut microbiota composition, prompting interest in probiotics as potential modulators of mental health. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of probiotic supplementation on mood, inflammatory immune markers, and serum neurotransmitters.<b>Method:</b> Using a five-arm, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial design, the study randomised 766 participants to receive capsules containing either <i>Lactococcus lactis</i> (FNZ339) or <i>Lactobacillus Plantarum</i> at a dose of either 1 × 10<sup>9</sup> colony forming units (CFU) or 1 × 10<sup>10</sup> CFU, or placebo daily for eight weeks. Viability counts performed during the trial showed an unexpected reduction in counts for <i>L. Plantarum</i>, resulting in a dosage per capsule that was not representative of a therapeutic dose. Therefore, analysis was performed only for <i>L. lactis</i> compared to placebo. The primary outcome of the study was stress as measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). Secondary outcomes included self-reported anxiety, depression, and sleep quality, salivary inflammatory markers, and blood neurotransmitters.<b>Results:</b> Improvements in psychological symptoms were observed across all groups. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the <i>L. lactis</i> and placebo groups for stress as the primary outcome <i>(L. lactis</i> -5.2, SD 8.6 vs Placebo: -5.6, SD 7.5). Similarly, no significant group differences were observed for secondary outcomes including anxiety, depression, or sleep quality. Similarly, no significant group differences were found for salivary cortisol or inflammatory markers.<b>Conclusion:</b> This study highlights the importance of large, well-controlled trials in probiotic research and underscores the strain-specific nature of probiotic effects on mental health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19423,"journal":{"name":"Nutritional Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutritional Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2026.2729710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychological stress is increasingly linked to gut microbiota composition, prompting interest in probiotics as potential modulators of mental health. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of probiotic supplementation on mood, inflammatory immune markers, and serum neurotransmitters.Method: Using a five-arm, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial design, the study randomised 766 participants to receive capsules containing either Lactococcus lactis (FNZ339) or Lactobacillus Plantarum at a dose of either 1 × 109 colony forming units (CFU) or 1 × 1010 CFU, or placebo daily for eight weeks. Viability counts performed during the trial showed an unexpected reduction in counts for L. Plantarum, resulting in a dosage per capsule that was not representative of a therapeutic dose. Therefore, analysis was performed only for L. lactis compared to placebo. The primary outcome of the study was stress as measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). Secondary outcomes included self-reported anxiety, depression, and sleep quality, salivary inflammatory markers, and blood neurotransmitters.Results: Improvements in psychological symptoms were observed across all groups. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the L. lactis and placebo groups for stress as the primary outcome (L. lactis -5.2, SD 8.6 vs Placebo: -5.6, SD 7.5). Similarly, no significant group differences were observed for secondary outcomes including anxiety, depression, or sleep quality. Similarly, no significant group differences were found for salivary cortisol or inflammatory markers.Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of large, well-controlled trials in probiotic research and underscores the strain-specific nature of probiotic effects on mental health outcomes.

补充益生菌对中等压力水平健康成人心理压力的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验
背景:心理压力与肠道菌群组成的关系越来越密切,这促使人们对益生菌作为心理健康的潜在调节剂产生了兴趣。本研究的目的是探讨益生菌补充对情绪、炎症免疫标志物和血清神经递质的影响。方法:采用五组随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验设计,该研究随机分配766名参与者,每天服用含有乳酸乳球菌(FNZ339)或植物乳杆菌的胶囊,剂量为1 × 109菌落形成单位(CFU)或1 × 1010 CFU,或安慰剂,持续8周。在试验期间进行的活力计数显示植物乳杆菌计数意外减少,导致每粒胶囊的剂量不能代表治疗剂量。因此,仅对乳杆菌与安慰剂进行了分析。研究的主要结果是通过抑郁焦虑压力量表(DASS-21)测量压力。次要结果包括自我报告的焦虑、抑郁、睡眠质量、唾液炎症标志物和血液神经递质。结果:所有组的心理症状均有改善。然而,在压力作为主要结局方面,乳酸菌组和安慰剂组之间没有统计学上的显著差异(乳酸菌组:-5.2,SD 8.6 vs安慰剂组:-5.6,SD 7.5)。同样,在焦虑、抑郁或睡眠质量等次要结果上,也没有观察到显著的组间差异。同样,在唾液皮质醇或炎症标志物方面也没有发现显著的组间差异。结论:本研究强调了益生菌研究中大规模、良好对照试验的重要性,并强调了益生菌对心理健康结果的作用的菌株特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutritional Neuroscience
Nutritional Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
236
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutritional Neuroscience is an international, interdisciplinary broad-based, online journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the field of nutrition that relates to the central and peripheral nervous system. Studies may include the role of different components of normal diet (protein, carbohydrate, fat, moderate use of alcohol, etc.), dietary supplements (minerals, vitamins, hormones, herbs, etc.), and food additives (artificial flavours, colours, sweeteners, etc.) on neurochemistry, neurobiology, and behavioural biology of all vertebrate and invertebrate organisms. Ideally this journal will serve as a forum for neuroscientists, nutritionists, neurologists, psychiatrists, and those interested in preventive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书