Comparison of Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and comprehensive complication index (CCI) systems for grading of surgical complications in patients with gastroduodenal perforations-a prospective study.
{"title":"Comparison of Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and comprehensive complication index (CCI) systems for grading of surgical complications in patients with gastroduodenal perforations-a prospective study.","authors":"Mohammad Faiz, Priyanka Rai, Amarjot Singh, Rohit Srivastava, Sunil Kumar Singh","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2026.2026-4-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gastro-duodenal perforation is a life-threatening surgical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries due to delayed presentation and sepsis. Accurate assessment of postoperative complications is essential for predicting outcomes. While the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) is widely used, it records only the highest-grade complication, potentially underestimating overall morbidity. The comprehensive complication index (CCI), a continuous scale incorporating all complications, may provide better prognostic value.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted over 18 months in a tertiary care centre in northern India and included 50 adult patients with gastro-duodenal perforation. Postoperative complications were graded using CDC and quantified using CCI. Associations with length of hospital stay (LOS) were analysed using ANOVA, Pearson's correlation, and multivariate linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 42.26±12.92 years, with a predominance of male and rural patients. Most participants had CDC Grade 3A complications (72%), with a mean CCI of 32.94±14.82. LOS increased significantly with higher CDC grades and CCI categories (p<0.01). CCI showed a significant moderate correlation with LOS (r=0.444, p=0.001), whereas CDC demonstrated a weak, non-significant correlation (r=0.149, p=0.303). On multivariate analysis, CCI independently predicted LOS (β=0.17, p<0.001), while CDC was not significant. The CCI-based model showed better predictive performance (R<sup>2</sup>=0.35) compared to the CDC model (R<sup>2</sup>=0.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CCI is a superior predictor of postoperative morbidity and hospital stay compared to CDC, particularly in patients with lower-grade CDC complications, as it more comprehensively reflects the cumulative burden of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2026.2026-4-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Gastro-duodenal perforation is a life-threatening surgical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries due to delayed presentation and sepsis. Accurate assessment of postoperative complications is essential for predicting outcomes. While the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) is widely used, it records only the highest-grade complication, potentially underestimating overall morbidity. The comprehensive complication index (CCI), a continuous scale incorporating all complications, may provide better prognostic value.
Material and methods: This prospective observational study was conducted over 18 months in a tertiary care centre in northern India and included 50 adult patients with gastro-duodenal perforation. Postoperative complications were graded using CDC and quantified using CCI. Associations with length of hospital stay (LOS) were analysed using ANOVA, Pearson's correlation, and multivariate linear regression.
Results: The mean age was 42.26±12.92 years, with a predominance of male and rural patients. Most participants had CDC Grade 3A complications (72%), with a mean CCI of 32.94±14.82. LOS increased significantly with higher CDC grades and CCI categories (p<0.01). CCI showed a significant moderate correlation with LOS (r=0.444, p=0.001), whereas CDC demonstrated a weak, non-significant correlation (r=0.149, p=0.303). On multivariate analysis, CCI independently predicted LOS (β=0.17, p<0.001), while CDC was not significant. The CCI-based model showed better predictive performance (R2=0.35) compared to the CDC model (R2=0.21).
Conclusion: The CCI is a superior predictor of postoperative morbidity and hospital stay compared to CDC, particularly in patients with lower-grade CDC complications, as it more comprehensively reflects the cumulative burden of complications.