Comparison of Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and comprehensive complication index (CCI) systems for grading of surgical complications in patients with gastroduodenal perforations-a prospective study.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Mohammad Faiz, Priyanka Rai, Amarjot Singh, Rohit Srivastava, Sunil Kumar Singh
{"title":"Comparison of Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and comprehensive complication index (CCI) systems for grading of surgical complications in patients with gastroduodenal perforations-a prospective study.","authors":"Mohammad Faiz, Priyanka Rai, Amarjot Singh, Rohit Srivastava, Sunil Kumar Singh","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2026.2026-4-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gastro-duodenal perforation is a life-threatening surgical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries due to delayed presentation and sepsis. Accurate assessment of postoperative complications is essential for predicting outcomes. While the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) is widely used, it records only the highest-grade complication, potentially underestimating overall morbidity. The comprehensive complication index (CCI), a continuous scale incorporating all complications, may provide better prognostic value.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted over 18 months in a tertiary care centre in northern India and included 50 adult patients with gastro-duodenal perforation. Postoperative complications were graded using CDC and quantified using CCI. Associations with length of hospital stay (LOS) were analysed using ANOVA, Pearson's correlation, and multivariate linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 42.26±12.92 years, with a predominance of male and rural patients. Most participants had CDC Grade 3A complications (72%), with a mean CCI of 32.94±14.82. LOS increased significantly with higher CDC grades and CCI categories (p<0.01). CCI showed a significant moderate correlation with LOS (r=0.444, p=0.001), whereas CDC demonstrated a weak, non-significant correlation (r=0.149, p=0.303). On multivariate analysis, CCI independently predicted LOS (β=0.17, p<0.001), while CDC was not significant. The CCI-based model showed better predictive performance (R<sup>2</sup>=0.35) compared to the CDC model (R<sup>2</sup>=0.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CCI is a superior predictor of postoperative morbidity and hospital stay compared to CDC, particularly in patients with lower-grade CDC complications, as it more comprehensively reflects the cumulative burden of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2026.2026-4-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Gastro-duodenal perforation is a life-threatening surgical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries due to delayed presentation and sepsis. Accurate assessment of postoperative complications is essential for predicting outcomes. While the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) is widely used, it records only the highest-grade complication, potentially underestimating overall morbidity. The comprehensive complication index (CCI), a continuous scale incorporating all complications, may provide better prognostic value.

Material and methods: This prospective observational study was conducted over 18 months in a tertiary care centre in northern India and included 50 adult patients with gastro-duodenal perforation. Postoperative complications were graded using CDC and quantified using CCI. Associations with length of hospital stay (LOS) were analysed using ANOVA, Pearson's correlation, and multivariate linear regression.

Results: The mean age was 42.26±12.92 years, with a predominance of male and rural patients. Most participants had CDC Grade 3A complications (72%), with a mean CCI of 32.94±14.82. LOS increased significantly with higher CDC grades and CCI categories (p<0.01). CCI showed a significant moderate correlation with LOS (r=0.444, p=0.001), whereas CDC demonstrated a weak, non-significant correlation (r=0.149, p=0.303). On multivariate analysis, CCI independently predicted LOS (β=0.17, p<0.001), while CDC was not significant. The CCI-based model showed better predictive performance (R2=0.35) compared to the CDC model (R2=0.21).

Conclusion: The CCI is a superior predictor of postoperative morbidity and hospital stay compared to CDC, particularly in patients with lower-grade CDC complications, as it more comprehensively reflects the cumulative burden of complications.

Clavien-Dindo分类(CDC)与综合并发症指数(CCI)系统对胃十二指肠穿孔手术并发症分级的前瞻性比较研究
目的:胃十二指肠穿孔是一种危及生命的外科急诊,发病率和死亡率高,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家,由于延迟出现和败血症。准确评估术后并发症对预测预后至关重要。虽然Clavien-Dindo分类(CDC)被广泛使用,但它只记录了最高级别的并发症,可能低估了总体发病率。综合并发症指数(CCI)是一个包含所有并发症的连续量表,可能具有更好的预后价值。材料和方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究在印度北部的一家三级保健中心进行了18个月,包括50名胃-十二指肠穿孔的成年患者。术后并发症采用CDC分级,CCI量化。使用方差分析、Pearson相关和多元线性回归分析与住院时间(LOS)的关系。结果:平均年龄42.26±12.92岁,以男性和农村患者为主。大多数参与者有CDC 3A级并发症(72%),平均CCI为32.94±14.82。与CDC模型(R2=0.21)相比,随着CDC分级和CCI类别的增加,LOS显著增加(p2=0.35)。结论:与CDC相比,CCI是一个更好的预测术后发病率和住院时间的指标,特别是对于低级别CDC并发症的患者,因为CCI更全面地反映了并发症的累积负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书