How can we meaningfully involve older adults in aged care research? Insights from establishing a consumer research advisory group.

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Janani Thillainadesan, Danielle Hutchinson, Carrie Hayter, Matthew Halpin, Joanne Coombes, Diane McPhail, Alan McPhail
{"title":"How can we meaningfully involve older adults in aged care research? Insights from establishing a consumer research advisory group.","authors":"Janani Thillainadesan, Danielle Hutchinson, Carrie Hayter, Matthew Halpin, Joanne Coombes, Diane McPhail, Alan McPhail","doi":"10.1071/PU25069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives and importance of study: </strong>With the global population ageing rapidly, the voices of older persons must be integrated into healthcare research. Consumer involvement can enhance the relevance, quality and policy impact of research. However, there is limited practical guidance on how to meaningfully involve older adults. This study describes the establishment of a consumer research advisory group within an aged care education research program, and explores consumer perspectives on the recruitment, support and involvement of older people in healthcare research.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study design was used.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data sources included meeting minutes and the research officer logbook documenting the consumer research advisory group's establishment, as well as an online survey of group members exploring their motivations and experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recruitment involved an inclusive expression of interest process, followed by interviews to support diverse representation. Barriers were addressed through remuneration, accessibility adjustments and personalised communication. Members (N = 8) reported positive experiences, and highlighted the importance of a supportive environment, clear orientation and provision of training. Most participants were motivated by a desire to use their lived experience to benefit others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Establishing the consumer research advisory group demonstrated the feasibility of involving older persons and carers in research. Key enablers included addressing logistical challenges, planning for sensory and cognitive needs, fostering inclusivity, and building trust. These findings provide practical guidance for strengthening consumer involvement in healthcare research in the context of global ageing.</p>","PeriodicalId":45898,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research & Practice","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PU25069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives and importance of study: With the global population ageing rapidly, the voices of older persons must be integrated into healthcare research. Consumer involvement can enhance the relevance, quality and policy impact of research. However, there is limited practical guidance on how to meaningfully involve older adults. This study describes the establishment of a consumer research advisory group within an aged care education research program, and explores consumer perspectives on the recruitment, support and involvement of older people in healthcare research.

Study type: A qualitative descriptive study design was used.

Methods: Data sources included meeting minutes and the research officer logbook documenting the consumer research advisory group's establishment, as well as an online survey of group members exploring their motivations and experiences.

Results: Recruitment involved an inclusive expression of interest process, followed by interviews to support diverse representation. Barriers were addressed through remuneration, accessibility adjustments and personalised communication. Members (N = 8) reported positive experiences, and highlighted the importance of a supportive environment, clear orientation and provision of training. Most participants were motivated by a desire to use their lived experience to benefit others.

Conclusions: Establishing the consumer research advisory group demonstrated the feasibility of involving older persons and carers in research. Key enablers included addressing logistical challenges, planning for sensory and cognitive needs, fostering inclusivity, and building trust. These findings provide practical guidance for strengthening consumer involvement in healthcare research in the context of global ageing.

我们怎样才能有意义地让老年人参与老年护理研究?建立消费者研究咨询小组的见解。
研究目的和重要性:随着全球人口迅速老龄化,老年人的声音必须纳入医疗保健研究。消费者的参与可以提高研究的相关性、质量和政策影响。然而,关于如何有意义地让老年人参与进来的实际指导有限。本研究描述了在一个老年护理教育研究计划中建立一个消费者研究咨询小组,并探讨了消费者对老年人在医疗保健研究中的招募、支持和参与的观点。研究类型:采用定性描述性研究设计。方法:数据来源包括会议记录和记录消费者研究咨询小组成立的研究人员日志,以及小组成员探讨其动机和经验的在线调查。结果:招聘过程包括一个包容性的兴趣表达过程,随后是支持多元化代表的面试。通过薪酬、无障碍调整和个性化沟通解决了障碍。成员(N = 8)报告了积极的经验,并强调了支持性环境、明确方向和提供培训的重要性。大多数参与者的动机都是希望利用自己的生活经验来造福他人。结论:建立消费者研究咨询小组证明了老年人和照顾者参与研究的可行性。关键的推动因素包括解决后勤挑战、规划感官和认知需求、促进包容性和建立信任。这些发现为在全球老龄化背景下加强消费者参与医疗保健研究提供了实际指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Research & Practice
Public Health Research & Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Research & Practice is an open-access, quarterly, online journal with a strong focus on the connection between research, policy and practice. It publishes innovative, high-quality papers that inform public health policy and practice, paying particular attention to innovations, data and perspectives from policy and practice. The journal is published by the Sax Institute, a national leader in promoting the use of research evidence in health policy. Formerly known as The NSW Public Health Bulletin, the journal has a long history. It was published by the NSW Ministry of Health for nearly a quarter of a century. Responsibility for its publication transferred to the Sax Institute in 2014, and the journal receives guidance from an expert editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书