Data-Driven Multiparameter Predictive Analysis of Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation Outcomes.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Connie Chang-Chien, Max Jiam, Stephanie M Younan, Yew Song Cheng, Nicole T Jiam
{"title":"Data-Driven Multiparameter Predictive Analysis of Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation Outcomes.","authors":"Connie Chang-Chien, Max Jiam, Stephanie M Younan, Yew Song Cheng, Nicole T Jiam","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000005076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study analyzes intersections between preoperative predictors of postcochlear implant (CI) hearing outcomes to address the gap in counseling CI candidates on postoperative hearing expectations beyond binary candidacy criteria.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic medical center and a third-party CI database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preoperative audiometric measures included word recognition score (WRS) and pure-tone average (PTA) for the unimplanted contralateral ear (CE) and implanted ear (IE). Postoperative WRS assessments extended to 500 days postsurgery, with the ~6-month mark as the primary outcome time point. Treatment success was defined as a postoperative WRS≥60% or clinically meaningful improvement (ΔWRS≥20%) for individuals with preoperative WRS≥30%. Statistical analyses included heatmaps and Kaplan-Meier plots to assess relationships between preoperative variables and time to treatment success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both CE and IE audiometric status demonstrated comparable predictive ability for CI outcomes when using the WRS<60% and PTA>60 criteria; however, IE status had a higher F1 score (0.27 vs. 0.069). Age was a critical modifier; patients below 60 years achieved treatment success faster than older patients (275 vs. 470 d; HR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.31-0.55, P<0.05). Patients below 60 years achieved hearing improvement at a significantly faster rate when using a pre-PTA<60 dB than a pre-PTA≥60 dB (HR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.22-0.99, P<0.05). Among older patients, those with CE WRS≥60% had a substantially higher likelihood of improvement compared with those with WRS <60% (HR=5.15; 95% CI: 3.29-8.08, P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative audiometric predictors of CI success vary significantly by age, with younger patients benefiting from residual hearing in the implanted ear and older patients relying on their contralateral, unimplanted ear for rehabilitation. These age-stratified patterns enable more personalized prognostic counseling about expected time to functional hearing improvement following cochlear implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000005076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study analyzes intersections between preoperative predictors of postcochlear implant (CI) hearing outcomes to address the gap in counseling CI candidates on postoperative hearing expectations beyond binary candidacy criteria.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary academic medical center and a third-party CI database.

Methods: Preoperative audiometric measures included word recognition score (WRS) and pure-tone average (PTA) for the unimplanted contralateral ear (CE) and implanted ear (IE). Postoperative WRS assessments extended to 500 days postsurgery, with the ~6-month mark as the primary outcome time point. Treatment success was defined as a postoperative WRS≥60% or clinically meaningful improvement (ΔWRS≥20%) for individuals with preoperative WRS≥30%. Statistical analyses included heatmaps and Kaplan-Meier plots to assess relationships between preoperative variables and time to treatment success.

Results: Both CE and IE audiometric status demonstrated comparable predictive ability for CI outcomes when using the WRS<60% and PTA>60 criteria; however, IE status had a higher F1 score (0.27 vs. 0.069). Age was a critical modifier; patients below 60 years achieved treatment success faster than older patients (275 vs. 470 d; HR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.31-0.55, P<0.05). Patients below 60 years achieved hearing improvement at a significantly faster rate when using a pre-PTA<60 dB than a pre-PTA≥60 dB (HR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.22-0.99, P<0.05). Among older patients, those with CE WRS≥60% had a substantially higher likelihood of improvement compared with those with WRS <60% (HR=5.15; 95% CI: 3.29-8.08, P<0.05).

Conclusion: Preoperative audiometric predictors of CI success vary significantly by age, with younger patients benefiting from residual hearing in the implanted ear and older patients relying on their contralateral, unimplanted ear for rehabilitation. These age-stratified patterns enable more personalized prognostic counseling about expected time to functional hearing improvement following cochlear implantation.

人工耳蜗康复结果的数据驱动多参数预测分析。
目的:本研究分析了人工耳蜗(CI)术后听力结果的术前预测因素之间的交叉点,以解决在二元候选标准之外的人工耳蜗(CI)术后听力期望咨询方面的差距。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。设置:三级学术医疗中心和第三方CI数据库。方法:术前听力测量包括对侧耳(CE)和对侧耳(IE)的单词识别评分(WRS)和纯音平均评分(PTA)。术后WRS评估延长至术后500天,以6个月为主要结局时间点。对于术前WRS≥30%的个体,术后WRS≥60%或临床有意义的改善(ΔWRS≥20%)被定义为治疗成功。统计分析包括热图和Kaplan-Meier图,以评估术前变量与治疗成功时间之间的关系。结果:当使用WRS60标准时,CE和IE听力状态对CI结果的预测能力相当;然而,IE状态有更高的F1评分(0.27比0.069)。年龄是一个关键的修饰词;60岁以下患者比老年患者更快获得治疗成功(275天vs 470天;HR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.31-0.55, p)结论:CI成功的术前听力预测指标因年龄而有显著差异,年轻患者受益于植入耳的残余听力,而老年患者依赖于对侧未植入耳的康复。这些年龄分层模式使得对人工耳蜗植入后功能性听力改善的预期时间进行更个性化的预后咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书