A consensus-based guideline for personalized bacteriophage therapy

IF 52.5 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Silvia Würstle, Simone C. Lieberknecht-Jouy, Anja Düchting, Holger Lößner, Pieter-Jan Ceyssens, Jean-Paul Pirnay, Mathieu de Jode, Shawna McCallin, Lorenz Leitner, Christian Willy, Sebastian Leptihn, Imke Korf, Evgeny A. Idelevich, Martin Witzenrath, Timo Faltus, Peter Ruth, Henning Blume, Manuel Cornely, Helmut Fickenscher, Mathias W. Pletz, Sylvia Hafkemeyer, Christine Rohde, Oleg Krut, Wolfgang Beyer, Oliver Hartwich, Ulrich Matt, Rebecca L. Knoll, Münevver Demir, Jens Hammerl, Stefanie Barbirz, Mirjam Stahl, Renate Krüger, Joachim Bugert, Melanie Kempe, Paul E. Turner, Benjamin Chan, Tristan Ferry, Maria J. G. T. Vehreschild, Annika Y. Classen, on behalf of the guideline group ‘Personalized Bacteriophage Therapy’ of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany
{"title":"A consensus-based guideline for personalized bacteriophage therapy","authors":"Silvia Würstle, Simone C. Lieberknecht-Jouy, Anja Düchting, Holger Lößner, Pieter-Jan Ceyssens, Jean-Paul Pirnay, Mathieu de Jode, Shawna McCallin, Lorenz Leitner, Christian Willy, Sebastian Leptihn, Imke Korf, Evgeny A. Idelevich, Martin Witzenrath, Timo Faltus, Peter Ruth, Henning Blume, Manuel Cornely, Helmut Fickenscher, Mathias W. Pletz, Sylvia Hafkemeyer, Christine Rohde, Oleg Krut, Wolfgang Beyer, Oliver Hartwich, Ulrich Matt, Rebecca L. Knoll, Münevver Demir, Jens Hammerl, Stefanie Barbirz, Mirjam Stahl, Renate Krüger, Joachim Bugert, Melanie Kempe, Paul E. Turner, Benjamin Chan, Tristan Ferry, Maria J. G. T. Vehreschild, Annika Y. Classen, on behalf of the guideline group ‘Personalized Bacteriophage Therapy’ of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany","doi":"10.1038/s41591-026-04654-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bacteriophages (phages) — viruses that selectively infect bacteria — are a promising option for personalized therapy of difficult-to-treat bacterial infections. Clinical implementation in many countries worldwide, however, faces multiple hurdles, including a lack of consensus on general principles for phage therapy, infrastructural requirements, procedures for quality-assured phage selection and preparation, clinical administration, monitoring and documentation. Existing guidance provides limited practical direction across the entire translational pathway and lacks inspection-ready specifications to support both pharmacies and clinical sites. These gaps impede safe and transparent clinical use and effective regulatory oversight. Likewise, there are no established processes to identify research questions that will be key to advancing clinical phage research in the future. To address these needs, this consensus-based guideline was developed within the methodological framework of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany under the leadership of the German Society for Infectious Diseases. It was created through a collaborative effort involving 20 professional societies, patient advocacy groups and regulatory authorities and 18 international experts. The guideline provides over 60 recommendations on core principles, infrastructure, preparation and quality control, administration and future research. Recommendations are supported by international societies, organizations and stakeholders. By providing clear and practice-oriented recommendations, this consensus statement paves the way for the safe and standardized use of personalized phage therapy. This consensus-based guideline provides clear and practice-oriented recommendations for the safe and standardized use of personalized phage therapy in the clinic.","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"32 10","pages":"3578-3594"},"PeriodicalIF":52.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-026-04654-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-026-04654-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bacteriophages (phages) — viruses that selectively infect bacteria — are a promising option for personalized therapy of difficult-to-treat bacterial infections. Clinical implementation in many countries worldwide, however, faces multiple hurdles, including a lack of consensus on general principles for phage therapy, infrastructural requirements, procedures for quality-assured phage selection and preparation, clinical administration, monitoring and documentation. Existing guidance provides limited practical direction across the entire translational pathway and lacks inspection-ready specifications to support both pharmacies and clinical sites. These gaps impede safe and transparent clinical use and effective regulatory oversight. Likewise, there are no established processes to identify research questions that will be key to advancing clinical phage research in the future. To address these needs, this consensus-based guideline was developed within the methodological framework of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany under the leadership of the German Society for Infectious Diseases. It was created through a collaborative effort involving 20 professional societies, patient advocacy groups and regulatory authorities and 18 international experts. The guideline provides over 60 recommendations on core principles, infrastructure, preparation and quality control, administration and future research. Recommendations are supported by international societies, organizations and stakeholders. By providing clear and practice-oriented recommendations, this consensus statement paves the way for the safe and standardized use of personalized phage therapy. This consensus-based guideline provides clear and practice-oriented recommendations for the safe and standardized use of personalized phage therapy in the clinic.
基于共识的个性化噬菌体治疗指南。
噬菌体(噬菌体)是一种选择性感染细菌的病毒,对于难以治疗的细菌感染的个性化治疗是一种很有希望的选择。然而,在世界上许多国家的临床实施面临多重障碍,包括在噬菌体治疗的一般原则、基础设施要求、有质量保证的噬菌体选择和制备程序、临床给药、监测和文件编制等方面缺乏共识。现有的指南在整个转化途径中提供了有限的实用指导,并且缺乏支持药房和临床场所的检查就绪规范。这些差距阻碍了安全和透明的临床使用和有效的监管监督。同样,也没有既定的流程来确定研究问题,这些问题将是未来推进临床噬菌体研究的关键。为了满足这些需求,在德国传染病学会领导下,在德国科学医学学会协会的方法框架内制定了这一基于共识的准则。它是由20个专业协会、患者倡导团体和监管当局以及18名国际专家共同努力创建的。该指南就核心原则、基础设施、准备和质量控制、行政管理和未来研究提供了60多项建议。建议得到国际社会、组织和利益攸关方的支持。通过提供明确和以实践为导向的建议,该共识声明为个性化噬菌体治疗的安全和标准化使用铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书