Comparison of topical 5% permethrin and oral ivermectin for treatment of childhood scabies: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Nazima Khatun, Sayani Pan, Kamirul Islam, Sudipto Paul, Taraknath Ghosh
{"title":"Comparison of topical 5% permethrin and oral ivermectin for treatment of childhood scabies: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Nazima Khatun, Sayani Pan, Kamirul Islam, Sudipto Paul, Taraknath Ghosh","doi":"10.1093/tropej/fmag063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Topical permethrin (5%), though considered the treatment of choice for scabies, has few drawbacks (expensive, poor compliance). This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of topical permethrin (5%) and oral ivermectin for treating childhood scabies. This randomized controlled trial was conducted in the dermatology and pediatric outpatient clinic of a tertiary care center between August 2023 and December 2024. Children in the study and control groups received oral ivermectin (200 µg/kg) and 5% permethrin, respectively, at an interval of 7 days. The cure rate at the 4th week was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were cure rate (1st and 2nd week), lesion count per patient (1st, 2nd, and 4th weeks), microscopic clearance (1st, 2nd, and 4th weeks), treatment failure (4th week), adverse events, reinfestation at the 6-month follow-up period, and cost to successfully treat one case. Three hundred and fifty-five children were included in either group. Though a significantly higher proportion of children in the control group were cured at the 1st week (41.8% vs 62.9%, p-value <.001), the cure rate was similar between the groups at the 2nd and 4th weeks (P-value >.05). Treatment failure was also similar in both groups (5.1% vs 3.9%, P-value = .47). The cost to treat one case successfully in the study and control groups was ₹44.2 ($0.46) and ₹140.4 ($1.47), respectively. Reinfestation during the follow-up period was similar in the two groups (P-value >.05). Oral ivermectin may be a cost-effective alternative treatment of childhood scabies. The trial was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of India (Registration no.: CTRI/2023/07/055910, dated 31 July 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":17521,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","volume":"72 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmag063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Topical permethrin (5%), though considered the treatment of choice for scabies, has few drawbacks (expensive, poor compliance). This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of topical permethrin (5%) and oral ivermectin for treating childhood scabies. This randomized controlled trial was conducted in the dermatology and pediatric outpatient clinic of a tertiary care center between August 2023 and December 2024. Children in the study and control groups received oral ivermectin (200 µg/kg) and 5% permethrin, respectively, at an interval of 7 days. The cure rate at the 4th week was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were cure rate (1st and 2nd week), lesion count per patient (1st, 2nd, and 4th weeks), microscopic clearance (1st, 2nd, and 4th weeks), treatment failure (4th week), adverse events, reinfestation at the 6-month follow-up period, and cost to successfully treat one case. Three hundred and fifty-five children were included in either group. Though a significantly higher proportion of children in the control group were cured at the 1st week (41.8% vs 62.9%, p-value <.001), the cure rate was similar between the groups at the 2nd and 4th weeks (P-value >.05). Treatment failure was also similar in both groups (5.1% vs 3.9%, P-value = .47). The cost to treat one case successfully in the study and control groups was ₹44.2 ($0.46) and ₹140.4 ($1.47), respectively. Reinfestation during the follow-up period was similar in the two groups (P-value >.05). Oral ivermectin may be a cost-effective alternative treatment of childhood scabies. The trial was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of India (Registration no.: CTRI/2023/07/055910, dated 31 July 2023).

5%氯菊酯外用和口服伊维菌素治疗儿童疥疮的比较:一项随机对照试验。
局部氯菊酯(5%)虽然被认为是治疗疥疮的首选,但几乎没有缺点(昂贵,依从性差)。本研究旨在比较外用氯菊酯(5%)和口服伊维菌素治疗儿童疥疮的疗效、安全性和成本效益。该随机对照试验于2023年8月至2024年12月在一家三级保健中心的皮肤科和儿科门诊进行。实验组和对照组儿童分别口服伊维菌素(200µg/kg)和5%氯菊酯,间隔7天。第4周的治愈率是主要观察指标。次要结果是治除率(第1周和第2周),每个患者的病变计数(第1、2和第4周),显微镜清除率(第1、2和第4周),治疗失败(第4周),不良事件,6个月随访期间的重新植入,成功治疗1例的成本。两组各有355名儿童。对照组患儿第1周治愈率明显高于对照组(41.8% vs 62.9%, p值0.05)。两组治疗失败率相似(5.1% vs 3.9%, p值= 0.47)。研究组和对照组成功治疗1例的成本分别为44.2卢比(0.46美元)和140.4卢比(1.47美元)。两组在随访期间的复植情况相似(p值>.05)。口服伊维菌素可能是一种具有成本效益的儿童疥疮替代治疗方法。该试验已在印度临床试验注册中心注册(注册号:: CTRI/2023/07/055910,日期为2023年7月31日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 医学-热带医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tropical Pediatrics provides a link between theory and practice in the field. Papers report key results of clinical and community research, and considerations of programme development. More general descriptive pieces are included when they have application to work preceeding elsewhere. The journal also presents review articles, book reviews and, occasionally, short monographs and selections of important papers delivered at relevant conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书