Adolescents' offline meetings with online contacts: Longitudinal relationships between the behavior and perceptions of risks, benefits, and peer involvement.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Vojtěch Mýlek, Ainize Martínez-Soto, Lenka Dedkova
{"title":"Adolescents' offline meetings with online contacts: Longitudinal relationships between the behavior and perceptions of risks, benefits, and peer involvement.","authors":"Vojtěch Mýlek, Ainize Martínez-Soto, Lenka Dedkova","doi":"10.1111/jora.70267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adolescents commonly meet new people online, and some later meet them in person. Such face-to-face meetings offer benefits alongside risks, which are emphasized in public discourse. Thus, adolescents' perceptions of how risky, beneficial, and normative the meetings are key to understanding their decisions to meet. Yet research on their effects is scarce and mostly cross-sectional. Drawing on the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior, this longitudinal study examines how perceived risk severity and likelihood, benefits likelihood, and peer involvement influence adolescents' face-to-face meetings with online contacts. We collected three waves of survey data from 2500 Czech adolescents (ages 11-16, 50.0% girls) and analyzed them using random intercept cross-lagged panel models. Perceived risk severity predicted a decrease in the number of face-to-face meetings, while perceived benefits likelihood predicted an increase. Reciprocally, attending more meetings predicted higher benefits likelihood and lower perceived risk severity. These reciprocal effects suggest that adolescents consider the risks and benefits of face-to-face meetings and update their perceptions based on experience. Unexpectedly, an increase in perceived risk likelihood predicted more face-to-face meetings, and perceived peer involvement did not predict either risk-benefit perceptions or the behavior itself. We discuss the nuanced influence of perceptions on different forms of adolescents' online risk-taking and implications for preventive efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":17026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","volume":"36 3","pages":"e70267"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13595467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.70267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adolescents commonly meet new people online, and some later meet them in person. Such face-to-face meetings offer benefits alongside risks, which are emphasized in public discourse. Thus, adolescents' perceptions of how risky, beneficial, and normative the meetings are key to understanding their decisions to meet. Yet research on their effects is scarce and mostly cross-sectional. Drawing on the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior, this longitudinal study examines how perceived risk severity and likelihood, benefits likelihood, and peer involvement influence adolescents' face-to-face meetings with online contacts. We collected three waves of survey data from 2500 Czech adolescents (ages 11-16, 50.0% girls) and analyzed them using random intercept cross-lagged panel models. Perceived risk severity predicted a decrease in the number of face-to-face meetings, while perceived benefits likelihood predicted an increase. Reciprocally, attending more meetings predicted higher benefits likelihood and lower perceived risk severity. These reciprocal effects suggest that adolescents consider the risks and benefits of face-to-face meetings and update their perceptions based on experience. Unexpectedly, an increase in perceived risk likelihood predicted more face-to-face meetings, and perceived peer involvement did not predict either risk-benefit perceptions or the behavior itself. We discuss the nuanced influence of perceptions on different forms of adolescents' online risk-taking and implications for preventive efforts.

青少年与在线联系人的线下会议:行为与风险、利益和同伴参与感知之间的纵向关系。
青少年通常在网上结识新朋友,有些人后来会亲自见面。这种面对面的会议既带来好处,也带来风险,这一点在公共话语中得到了强调。因此,青少年对会议的风险、有益程度和规范性的看法是理解他们开会决定的关键。然而,对其影响的研究很少,而且大多是横向的。利用健康信念模型和计划行为理论,本纵向研究考察了感知风险严重程度和可能性、利益可能性和同伴参与如何影响青少年与在线联系人的面对面会议。我们收集了2500名捷克青少年(11-16岁,50.0%为女孩)的三波调查数据,并使用随机截距交叉滞后面板模型进行分析。感知到的风险严重程度预示着面对面会议的数量会减少,而感知到的利益可能性则预示着面对面会议的数量会增加。反之,参加更多的会议预示着更高的收益可能性和更低的感知风险严重性。这些相互作用表明,青少年会考虑面对面会议的风险和益处,并根据经验更新他们的看法。出乎意料的是,感知风险可能性的增加预示着更多的面对面会议,而感知同伴参与既不能预测风险-收益感知,也不能预测行为本身。我们讨论了认知对不同形式的青少年网络冒险行为的细微影响以及对预防措施的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary and international in scope, the Journal of Research on Adolescence (JRA) significantly advances knowledge in the field of adolescent research. Employing a diverse array of methodologies, this compelling journal publishes original research and integrative reviews of the highest level of scholarship. Featured studies include both quantitative and qualitative methodologies applied to cognitive, physical, emotional, and social development and behavior. Articles pertinent to the variety of developmental patterns inherent throughout adolescence are featured, including cross-national and cross-cultural studies. Attention is given to normative patterns of behavior as well as individual differences rooted in personal or social and cultural factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书