Real-world neuropsychiatric safety profile of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa infusion in advanced Parkinson's disease.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Giulia Lazzeri, Roberta Zangaglia, Carlo Fazio, Elena Contaldi, Salvatore Bonvegna, Simone Regalbuto, Simone Malaspina, Gianni Pezzoli, Alice Jacqueline Mariangela Jelmoni, Silvia Piazza, Francesca Valentino, Luca Magistrelli, Ioannis Ugo Isaias, Antonio Pisani
{"title":"Real-world neuropsychiatric safety profile of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa infusion in advanced Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Giulia Lazzeri, Roberta Zangaglia, Carlo Fazio, Elena Contaldi, Salvatore Bonvegna, Simone Regalbuto, Simone Malaspina, Gianni Pezzoli, Alice Jacqueline Mariangela Jelmoni, Silvia Piazza, Francesca Valentino, Luca Magistrelli, Ioannis Ugo Isaias, Antonio Pisani","doi":"10.1007/s00415-026-14113-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To describe demographic, clinical, and neuropsychiatric safety outcomes in a cohort of PD patients treated with LDp/CDp infusion in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed a database of 77 consecutive PD patients treated with LDp/CDp at two Italian tertiary referral centers, with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Baseline cognitive, epidemiological, and clinical variables were assessed to determine potential neuropsychiatric adverse event (NAE) risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients had long disease duration (13.8±6.4 years) and moderate-to-severe motor burden (MDS-UPDRS III: 34.4±15). Pre-existing cognitive impairment (MCI 41.6%, dementia 7.8%), prior hallucinations (26%), and impulse control disorders (27.3%) were frequent. At 6 months, mean L-dopa equivalent daily dose increased by ~300 mg (p<0.001). The dropout rate was 16.9% (13 patients), mainly due to AEs (38.5%), bridging to DBS (23%), or device intolerance (15.4%). New-onset NAEs emerged in 17 patients (22.1%) at a median of 30 days, predominantly hallucinations (41.2%) and psychosis (29.4%). Most events were efficiently managed via careful infusion rate adjustments and low-dose antipsychotics, achieving resolution or improvement in 82% of cases. Three patients (18%) discontinued therapy due to severe NAEs. Multivariable regression analysis confirmed baseline Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) score as the primary independent predictor of NAE development (OR 0.707, p=0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LDp/CDp infusion is well-tolerated. Although NAEs were more frequent than in pivotal trials, they were largely manageable. Frontal executive dysfunction emerged as a significant risk factor, suggesting specific frontal screening should be routine in candidacy evaluation for cognitively frail patients. Preventive strategies to reduce risk are proposed and discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"273 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13593741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-026-14113-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To describe demographic, clinical, and neuropsychiatric safety outcomes in a cohort of PD patients treated with LDp/CDp infusion in a real-world setting.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a database of 77 consecutive PD patients treated with LDp/CDp at two Italian tertiary referral centers, with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Baseline cognitive, epidemiological, and clinical variables were assessed to determine potential neuropsychiatric adverse event (NAE) risk factors.

Results: Patients had long disease duration (13.8±6.4 years) and moderate-to-severe motor burden (MDS-UPDRS III: 34.4±15). Pre-existing cognitive impairment (MCI 41.6%, dementia 7.8%), prior hallucinations (26%), and impulse control disorders (27.3%) were frequent. At 6 months, mean L-dopa equivalent daily dose increased by ~300 mg (p<0.001). The dropout rate was 16.9% (13 patients), mainly due to AEs (38.5%), bridging to DBS (23%), or device intolerance (15.4%). New-onset NAEs emerged in 17 patients (22.1%) at a median of 30 days, predominantly hallucinations (41.2%) and psychosis (29.4%). Most events were efficiently managed via careful infusion rate adjustments and low-dose antipsychotics, achieving resolution or improvement in 82% of cases. Three patients (18%) discontinued therapy due to severe NAEs. Multivariable regression analysis confirmed baseline Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) score as the primary independent predictor of NAE development (OR 0.707, p=0.010).

Conclusions: LDp/CDp infusion is well-tolerated. Although NAEs were more frequent than in pivotal trials, they were largely manageable. Frontal executive dysfunction emerged as a significant risk factor, suggesting specific frontal screening should be routine in candidacy evaluation for cognitively frail patients. Preventive strategies to reduce risk are proposed and discussed.

foslevodopa/foscarbidopa输注治疗晚期帕金森病的真实世界神经精神安全性
背景:描述在现实环境中接受LDp/CDp输注治疗的PD患者队列的人口学、临床和神经精神安全结果。方法:我们回顾性分析了意大利两家三级转诊中心77例连续接受LDp/CDp治疗的PD患者的数据库,随访时间至少为6个月。评估基线认知、流行病学和临床变量,以确定潜在的神经精神不良事件(NAE)危险因素。结果:患者病程长(13.8±6.4年),运动负担中重度(MDS-UPDRS III: 34.4±15)。先前存在的认知障碍(MCI 41.6%,痴呆7.8%),先前的幻觉(26%)和冲动控制障碍(27.3%)是常见的。6个月时,平均左旋多巴当量日剂量增加~300 mg (p)。尽管NAEs比关键试验更频繁,但它们在很大程度上是可控的。额叶执行功能障碍是一个重要的危险因素,提示在认知虚弱患者的候选资格评估中,应该常规进行特定的额叶筛查。提出并讨论了降低风险的预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书