Performance of a rapid direct-from-blood antibiotic susceptibility test based on MIC test strips on Enterobacterales blood cultures.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Tassadit Nait Larbi, Hélène Poupet, Céline Plainvert, Philippe Morand, Sarrah Boukthir, Julien Loubinoux, Alexandra Doloy, Lamia Rouabah, Claire Poyart, Asmaa Tazi, Hedi Mammeri
{"title":"Performance of a rapid direct-from-blood antibiotic susceptibility test based on MIC test strips on Enterobacterales blood cultures.","authors":"Tassadit Nait Larbi, Hélène Poupet, Céline Plainvert, Philippe Morand, Sarrah Boukthir, Julien Loubinoux, Alexandra Doloy, Lamia Rouabah, Claire Poyart, Asmaa Tazi, Hedi Mammeri","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkag312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the technical performance of a rapid direct-from-blood antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) using MIC test strips (MTS-AST) directly on enterobacteria-positive blood culture broth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty contrived blood culture bottles (BACT/ALERT FA plus) were prepared using 10 mL of sheep blood and a diluted bacterial suspension. A collection of 50 enterobacterial isolates was used, including 25 strains previously recovered from blood cultures and 25 additional strains exhibiting various mechanisms of resistance. Blood culture bottles were incubated in the BACT/ALERT VIRTUO system until they flagged positive. Then they were pulled and two drops of blood culture broth (approximately 100 µL) were directly poured and streaked onto a Mueller-Hinton agar plate. MIC test strips were immediately laid on the plate, before incubation at 35°C ± 1°C in an aerobic atmosphere for 5 h. Seven β-lactams were tested including amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime and meropenem. Comparator MICs were obtained using MIC test strips according to the manufacturer's instructions with a standardized inoculum and 24 h of incubation. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA) and bias were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EA and CA between the MTS-AST and the comparator method were ≥94% and ≥90%, respectively, with no very major error. Positive bias was apparent for all antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MTS-AST provided rapid results (in 5 h) that correlated well with the comparator method on blood culture broth containing Enterobacterales. Given the shorter time to results, the reduced time cost, the limited handwork and the reduced cost per test, the MTS-AST constitutes a fast and reliable method.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":"81 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkag312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the technical performance of a rapid direct-from-blood antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) using MIC test strips (MTS-AST) directly on enterobacteria-positive blood culture broth.

Methods: Fifty contrived blood culture bottles (BACT/ALERT FA plus) were prepared using 10 mL of sheep blood and a diluted bacterial suspension. A collection of 50 enterobacterial isolates was used, including 25 strains previously recovered from blood cultures and 25 additional strains exhibiting various mechanisms of resistance. Blood culture bottles were incubated in the BACT/ALERT VIRTUO system until they flagged positive. Then they were pulled and two drops of blood culture broth (approximately 100 µL) were directly poured and streaked onto a Mueller-Hinton agar plate. MIC test strips were immediately laid on the plate, before incubation at 35°C ± 1°C in an aerobic atmosphere for 5 h. Seven β-lactams were tested including amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime and meropenem. Comparator MICs were obtained using MIC test strips according to the manufacturer's instructions with a standardized inoculum and 24 h of incubation. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA) and bias were determined.

Results: EA and CA between the MTS-AST and the comparator method were ≥94% and ≥90%, respectively, with no very major error. Positive bias was apparent for all antibiotics.

Conclusions: MTS-AST provided rapid results (in 5 h) that correlated well with the comparator method on blood culture broth containing Enterobacterales. Given the shorter time to results, the reduced time cost, the limited handwork and the reduced cost per test, the MTS-AST constitutes a fast and reliable method.

基于MIC试纸的肠杆菌血培养快速直接血药敏试验
目的:评价MIC试纸条(MTS-AST)直接用于肠杆菌阳性血培养肉汤的快速血药敏试验(AST)技术性能。方法:用10 mL羊血和稀释后的菌悬液制备50个人造血培养瓶(BACT/ALERT FA +)。使用了50株分离肠杆菌,包括25株先前从血液培养中恢复的菌株和另外25株表现出各种耐药机制的菌株。血培养瓶在BACT/ALERT VIRTUO系统中孵育,直到标记为阳性。然后将其拉出,直接倒入两滴血培养肉汤(约100µL),并在muller - hinton琼脂板上划线。立即将MIC测试条铺在板上,然后在35°C±1°C的好氧环境中孵育5小时。检测阿莫西林、阿莫西林/克拉维酸酯、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、头孢噻肟、头孢噻啶、头孢吡肟、美罗培南等7种β-内酰胺类药物。根据制造商的说明,使用MIC试纸获得比较MIC,接种标准,孵育24小时。确定基本一致(EA)、绝对一致(CA)和偏倚。结果:MTS-AST和比较法的EA和CA分别为≥94%和≥90%,没有非常大的误差。所有抗生素的阳性偏倚都很明显。结论:MTS-AST在含肠杆菌的血培养肉汤中提供了快速(5 h)的结果,与比较方法具有良好的相关性。考虑到获得结果的时间更短,时间成本更低,手工操作有限,每次测试成本更低,MTS-AST是一种快速可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书