Magnitude of Portal Pressure Reduction and Clinical Outcomes in Randomized Trials.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Matthew Tam, Irene Pascual, Jarell Jie-Rae Tan, Daniel Veldhuijzen van Zanten, Beverley Kok, Shuen Sung, Janice Y Kung, Yu Jun Wong, Juan G Abraldes
{"title":"Magnitude of Portal Pressure Reduction and Clinical Outcomes in Randomized Trials.","authors":"Matthew Tam, Irene Pascual, Jarell Jie-Rae Tan, Daniel Veldhuijzen van Zanten, Beverley Kok, Shuen Sung, Janice Y Kung, Yu Jun Wong, Juan G Abraldes","doi":"10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.102028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Portal hypertension is a major driver of complications of cirrhosis. Observational studies suggest that reductions in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) improve prognosis, but the magnitude of risk reduction per unit HVPG decrease has not been quantified across randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We performed a meta-regression of RCTs to quantify this relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched for RCTs testing pharmacological interventions against placebo or no treatment in portal hypertension that reported both HVPG measurements and clinical outcomes. The predictor was the between-group difference in HVPG change (treatment minus control, in mmHg). Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and variceal events, defined hierarchically as variceal progression (when reported) or variceal bleeding. We used random-effects meta-regression, weighted by the inverse variance of the log odds ratio. Sensitivity analyses tested alternative weighting schemes accounting for HVPG measurement error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two RCTs (2,871 patients; 1,991 with HVPG measurements) were included. Each 1 mmHg greater HVPG reduction in the treatment versus control group was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (OR 0.850, 95% CI 0.771-0.937; p=0.004; I<sup>2</sup>=0%) and fewer variceal events (OR 0.852, 95% CI 0.744-0.976; p=0.032; I<sup>2</sup>=18.8%). Results were consistent across outcome-based, joint, and iteratively reweighted meta-regression models. Exploratory non-linear analyses showed no evidence against a linear relationship within the observed range.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Each mmHg of HVPG reduction achieved by pharmacological therapy is associated with, at the trial level, approximately 15% lower odds of mortality and variceal events. These findings provide a quantitative framework for interpreting HVPG changes in Phase II trials and informing the design of Phase III studies.</p><p><strong>Impact and implications: </strong>Lowering portal pressure is central to preventing complications of cirrhosis, but the clinical benefit associated with a given treatment-related reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient has not been quantified across randomized trials. In 22 trials, each additional 1 mmHg reduction was associated at the trial level with approximately 15% lower odds of death and variceal events. This quantitative relationship may help researchers and drug developers interpret phase II hemodynamic results and inform go/no-go decisions and phase III trial design. Because the analysis uses aggregate trial-level data, it does not establish causality or predict benefit for individual patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14764,"journal":{"name":"JHEP Reports","volume":" ","pages":"102028"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHEP Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.102028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims: Portal hypertension is a major driver of complications of cirrhosis. Observational studies suggest that reductions in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) improve prognosis, but the magnitude of risk reduction per unit HVPG decrease has not been quantified across randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We performed a meta-regression of RCTs to quantify this relationship.

Methods: We systematically searched for RCTs testing pharmacological interventions against placebo or no treatment in portal hypertension that reported both HVPG measurements and clinical outcomes. The predictor was the between-group difference in HVPG change (treatment minus control, in mmHg). Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and variceal events, defined hierarchically as variceal progression (when reported) or variceal bleeding. We used random-effects meta-regression, weighted by the inverse variance of the log odds ratio. Sensitivity analyses tested alternative weighting schemes accounting for HVPG measurement error.

Results: Twenty-two RCTs (2,871 patients; 1,991 with HVPG measurements) were included. Each 1 mmHg greater HVPG reduction in the treatment versus control group was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (OR 0.850, 95% CI 0.771-0.937; p=0.004; I2=0%) and fewer variceal events (OR 0.852, 95% CI 0.744-0.976; p=0.032; I2=18.8%). Results were consistent across outcome-based, joint, and iteratively reweighted meta-regression models. Exploratory non-linear analyses showed no evidence against a linear relationship within the observed range.

Conclusions: Each mmHg of HVPG reduction achieved by pharmacological therapy is associated with, at the trial level, approximately 15% lower odds of mortality and variceal events. These findings provide a quantitative framework for interpreting HVPG changes in Phase II trials and informing the design of Phase III studies.

Impact and implications: Lowering portal pressure is central to preventing complications of cirrhosis, but the clinical benefit associated with a given treatment-related reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient has not been quantified across randomized trials. In 22 trials, each additional 1 mmHg reduction was associated at the trial level with approximately 15% lower odds of death and variceal events. This quantitative relationship may help researchers and drug developers interpret phase II hemodynamic results and inform go/no-go decisions and phase III trial design. Because the analysis uses aggregate trial-level data, it does not establish causality or predict benefit for individual patients.

随机试验中门静脉压降低的幅度和临床结果。
背景与目的:门脉高压是肝硬化并发症的主要驱动因素。观察性研究表明,降低肝静脉压梯度(HVPG)可改善预后,但在随机对照试验(RCTs)中,尚未量化每单位HVPG降低的风险程度。我们对随机对照试验进行了meta回归来量化这种关系。方法:我们系统地检索了对门静脉高压症进行药物干预或不治疗的随机对照试验,这些随机对照试验报告了HVPG测量和临床结果。预测因子是HVPG变化(治疗减去对照组,mmHg)的组间差异。主要终点是全因死亡率和静脉曲张事件,按等级定义为静脉曲张进展(报告时)或静脉曲张出血。我们使用随机效应元回归,以对数比值比的反方差加权。敏感性分析测试了考虑HVPG测量误差的备选加权方案。结果:纳入22项随机对照试验(2,871例患者,1,991例HVPG测量)。与对照组相比,治疗组HVPG每降低1 mmHg,全因死亡率显著降低(OR 0.850, 95% CI 0.771-0.937; p=0.004; I2=0%),静脉曲张事件减少(OR 0.852, 95% CI 0.744-0.976; p=0.032; I2=18.8%)。结果在基于结果的、联合的和迭代加权的meta回归模型中是一致的。探索性非线性分析显示,在观察范围内没有证据表明存在线性关系。结论:在试验水平上,通过药物治疗实现的HVPG每降低mmHg,与死亡率和静脉曲张事件的几率降低约15%相关。这些发现为解释II期试验中HVPG的变化提供了定量框架,并为III期研究的设计提供了信息。影响和意义:降低门静脉压力是预防肝硬化并发症的核心,但在随机试验中,与治疗相关的肝静脉压力梯度降低相关的临床益处尚未被量化。在22项试验中,在试验水平上,每额外降低1mmhg,死亡和静脉曲张事件的几率降低约15%。这种定量关系可以帮助研究人员和药物开发人员解释II期血流动力学结果,并为进行/不进行的决定和III期试验设计提供信息。由于该分析使用了总体试验水平的数据,因此无法确定因果关系或预测个体患者的获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JHEP Reports
JHEP Reports GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
161
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: JHEP Reports is an open access journal that is affiliated with the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). It serves as a companion journal to the highly respected Journal of Hepatology. The primary objective of JHEP Reports is to publish original papers and reviews that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of liver diseases. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including basic, translational, and clinical research. It also focuses on global issues in hepatology, with particular emphasis on areas such as clinical trials, novel diagnostics, precision medicine and therapeutics, cancer research, cellular and molecular studies, artificial intelligence, microbiome research, epidemiology, and cutting-edge technologies. In summary, JHEP Reports is dedicated to promoting scientific discoveries and innovations in liver diseases through the publication of high-quality research papers and reviews covering various aspects of hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书