Who Are We Missing: Examining Health Insurance Coverage for Expanded Carrier Screening.

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Candice Shi, MaryAnn Campion, Carly M Smith, Jenna Kornish
{"title":"Who Are We Missing: Examining Health Insurance Coverage for Expanded Carrier Screening.","authors":"Candice Shi, MaryAnn Campion, Carly M Smith, Jenna Kornish","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2026.102729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our study aimed to examine the effect of coverage criteria utilized by payors on the detection of an individual's carrier status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of patients and their reproductive partners at a single institution who had a positive carrier screening result to collect demographic information, carrier screening results, and family medical history. We estimated the proportion of individuals who would not have met coverage criteria for carrier screening that would detect their full carrier status based on policies used by major healthcare payors in California.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the participants with positive carrier screening results, 93% would not have had their full carrier status detected if carrier screening following payor policies was elected instead of expanded carrier screening. The highest proportion of participants who would not have their carrier status detected were of East Asian ethnicity (94%) and White ethnicity (94%), followed by South Asian ethnicity (93%) and Hispanic ethnicity (93%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Payors generally rely on ethnicity and family history to determine what type of carrier screening a policyholder is eligible for, therefore missing a significant portion of people who are heterozygous for pathogenic variants. These criteria contribute to insufficient, unequal and limited carrier screening strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"102729"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2026.102729","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Our study aimed to examine the effect of coverage criteria utilized by payors on the detection of an individual's carrier status.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients and their reproductive partners at a single institution who had a positive carrier screening result to collect demographic information, carrier screening results, and family medical history. We estimated the proportion of individuals who would not have met coverage criteria for carrier screening that would detect their full carrier status based on policies used by major healthcare payors in California.

Results: Of the participants with positive carrier screening results, 93% would not have had their full carrier status detected if carrier screening following payor policies was elected instead of expanded carrier screening. The highest proportion of participants who would not have their carrier status detected were of East Asian ethnicity (94%) and White ethnicity (94%), followed by South Asian ethnicity (93%) and Hispanic ethnicity (93%).

Conclusion: Payors generally rely on ethnicity and family history to determine what type of carrier screening a policyholder is eligible for, therefore missing a significant portion of people who are heterozygous for pathogenic variants. These criteria contribute to insufficient, unequal and limited carrier screening strategies.

我们错过了谁:检查扩大携带者筛查的健康保险覆盖范围。
目的:我们的研究旨在检验支付方使用的覆盖标准对检测个人载体状态的影响。方法:我们对单个机构中携带者筛查阳性的患者及其生殖伴侣进行回顾性图表回顾,收集人口统计信息、携带者筛查结果和家族病史。根据加州主要医疗保健支付者使用的政策,我们估计了不符合携带者筛查覆盖标准的个人比例,该筛查将检测他们的完全携带者状态。结果:在携带者筛查结果呈阳性的参与者中,如果选择按照付款人政策进行携带者筛查而不是扩大携带者筛查,93%的人不会检测到他们的完整携带者状态。不愿检测其携带者状态的参与者比例最高的是东亚族裔(94%)和白种人(94%),其次是南亚族裔(93%)和西班牙裔(93%)。结论:支付人通常依靠种族和家族史来确定投保人有资格进行哪种类型的携带者筛查,因此遗漏了很大一部分致病变异杂合的人。这些标准导致携带者筛查策略不充分、不平等和有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书