Trends in the use of biologic agents and their persistence rates in inflammatory bowel disease in India.

IF 2.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sidharth Harindranath, Devendra Desai, Philip Abraham, Saee Patil, Vinita Patil, Tarun Gupta
{"title":"Trends in the use of biologic agents and their persistence rates in inflammatory bowel disease in India.","authors":"Sidharth Harindranath, Devendra Desai, Philip Abraham, Saee Patil, Vinita Patil, Tarun Gupta","doi":"10.1007/s12664-026-02048-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biologic agents revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), yet their usage rates in India have historically been among the lowest globally. This is primarily attributed to cost. Data is scarce regarding the proportion of Indian patients with IBD needing biologics, actually receiving them and the persistence with therapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the proportions of patients with IBD needing a biologic agent, receiving it, continuing or discontinuing it and reasons for these.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cohort study enrolled 697 patients with IBD from a single center: 297 patients in a prospective arm and 400 patients in a retrospective arm. Demographic data and data on the need for biologics, receipt of therapy, duration of use and specific reasons for discontinuation were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Biologics were indicated in 95 (31.9%) patients in the prospective arm and 16 (4%) in the retrospective arm. In the former, 80 (26.9%) patients received biologics whereas in the latter 13 (3.2%) received it. On follow-up, 51 (17.1%) in the prospective arm and 10 (2.5%) in the retrospective arm continued biologics for median duration of 13.5 (IQR 44) months and 18.5 (IQR 23) months, respectively. Major reasons for discontinuation in the prospective cohort included primary non-response and secondary loss of response (31%), whereas the retrospective arm was driven by non-affordability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>About 16% (111/697) of our patients with IBD needed biologics; of these, 16% (18/111) did not receive it. About a third of patients discontinued it. Strategies must focus on cost reduction and optimizing the use of biologics.</p>","PeriodicalId":13404,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-026-02048-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biologic agents revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), yet their usage rates in India have historically been among the lowest globally. This is primarily attributed to cost. Data is scarce regarding the proportion of Indian patients with IBD needing biologics, actually receiving them and the persistence with therapy.

Aim: To evaluate the proportions of patients with IBD needing a biologic agent, receiving it, continuing or discontinuing it and reasons for these.

Methods: This observational cohort study enrolled 697 patients with IBD from a single center: 297 patients in a prospective arm and 400 patients in a retrospective arm. Demographic data and data on the need for biologics, receipt of therapy, duration of use and specific reasons for discontinuation were recorded.

Results: Biologics were indicated in 95 (31.9%) patients in the prospective arm and 16 (4%) in the retrospective arm. In the former, 80 (26.9%) patients received biologics whereas in the latter 13 (3.2%) received it. On follow-up, 51 (17.1%) in the prospective arm and 10 (2.5%) in the retrospective arm continued biologics for median duration of 13.5 (IQR 44) months and 18.5 (IQR 23) months, respectively. Major reasons for discontinuation in the prospective cohort included primary non-response and secondary loss of response (31%), whereas the retrospective arm was driven by non-affordability.

Conclusion: About 16% (111/697) of our patients with IBD needed biologics; of these, 16% (18/111) did not receive it. About a third of patients discontinued it. Strategies must focus on cost reduction and optimizing the use of biologics.

印度炎症性肠病生物制剂的使用趋势及其持续率
背景:生物制剂彻底改变了炎症性肠病(IBD)的治疗,但其在印度的使用率历来是全球最低的。这主要归因于成本。关于印度IBD患者需要生物制剂、实际接受生物制剂和持续治疗的比例的数据很少。目的:评价IBD患者需要生物制剂、接受生物制剂、继续或停止生物制剂的比例及其原因。方法:这项观察性队列研究从单一中心招募了697名IBD患者:297名患者在前瞻性组,400名患者在回顾性组。记录了人口统计数据和关于生物制剂需求、接受治疗、使用时间和停药具体原因的数据。结果:前瞻性组95例(31.9%)患者接受了生物制剂治疗,回顾性组16例(4%)患者接受了生物制剂治疗。前者有80例(26.9%)患者接受了生物制剂治疗,后者有13例(3.2%)患者接受了生物制剂治疗。在随访中,51例(17.1%)前瞻性组和10例(2.5%)回顾性组继续使用生物制剂,中位持续时间分别为13.5 (IQR 44)个月和18.5 (IQR 23)个月。在前瞻性队列中,停药的主要原因包括原发性无反应和继发性无反应(31%),而在回顾性队列中,停药的主要原因是负担不起。结论:约16%(111/697)的IBD患者需要生物制剂;其中,16%(18/111)没有接受治疗。大约有三分之一的患者停止服用。战略必须侧重于降低成本和优化生物制剂的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Gastroenterology aims to help doctors everywhere practise better medicine and to influence the debate on gastroenterology. To achieve these aims, we publish original scientific studies, state-of -the-art special articles, reports and papers commenting on the clinical, scientific and public health factors affecting aspects of gastroenterology. We shall be delighted to receive articles for publication in all of these categories and letters commenting on the contents of the Journal or on issues of interest to our readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书