Masturbation grip strength and perceived intravaginal pressure differential are associated with self-estimated intravaginal ejaculation latency time: a retrospective study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Hui Zhang, Chunlin Wang, Dake Zhu, Andrea Sansone, Elena Colonnello, Tommaso B Jannini, Emmanuele A Jannini, Hui Li, Yan Zhang
{"title":"Masturbation grip strength and perceived intravaginal pressure differential are associated with self-estimated intravaginal ejaculation latency time: a retrospective study.","authors":"Hui Zhang, Chunlin Wang, Dake Zhu, Andrea Sansone, Elena Colonnello, Tommaso B Jannini, Emmanuele A Jannini, Hui Li, Yan Zhang","doi":"10.1038/s41443-026-01358-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although masturbation is common, the association between masturbation-related behaviors and self-estimated intravaginal ejaculation latency time (sIELT) has not been studied. This single-centre retrospective study examined associations between sIELT and masturbatory parameters in 470 male clinic attendees (January 2020-March 2022). sIELT was dichotomised as ≤3 vs >3 min (n = 322 vs 148). Masturbatory grip strength and perceived intravaginal pressure were quantified with a blood-pressure cuff (mmHg; three trials averaged); their differential (G-I) was derived. Hand position was pre-specified as P1-P2 (glans-dominant), P3-P5 (shaft-dominant), or P1-P5 (full-length). The primary analysis used multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI); exploratory sensitivity analyses are reported in the Supplementary Appendix. Compared with the ≤3-min group, the >3-min group had higher G-I (median 5.5 vs 0 mmHg; p < 0.001). Group differences were not significant for grip strength (p = 0.06), perceived intravaginal pressure (p = 0.06), monthly frequency (p = 0.58), duration (p = 0.31), or age at onset (p = 0.05). Shaft-dominant masturbation was more frequent in the >3-min group (55.4 vs 31.4%; p < 0.001) and full-length less frequent (32.4 vs 49.7%; p < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age and BMI, each 10-mmHg increase in G-I was associated with higher odds of sIELT >3 min (adjusted OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.44; p < 0.001), and shaft-dominant masturbation was associated with higher odds of sIELT >3 min than full-length masturbation (adjusted OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.77-4.30; p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the main findings; conclusions remain regression-based.</p>","PeriodicalId":14068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impotence Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impotence Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-026-01358-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although masturbation is common, the association between masturbation-related behaviors and self-estimated intravaginal ejaculation latency time (sIELT) has not been studied. This single-centre retrospective study examined associations between sIELT and masturbatory parameters in 470 male clinic attendees (January 2020-March 2022). sIELT was dichotomised as ≤3 vs >3 min (n = 322 vs 148). Masturbatory grip strength and perceived intravaginal pressure were quantified with a blood-pressure cuff (mmHg; three trials averaged); their differential (G-I) was derived. Hand position was pre-specified as P1-P2 (glans-dominant), P3-P5 (shaft-dominant), or P1-P5 (full-length). The primary analysis used multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI); exploratory sensitivity analyses are reported in the Supplementary Appendix. Compared with the ≤3-min group, the >3-min group had higher G-I (median 5.5 vs 0 mmHg; p < 0.001). Group differences were not significant for grip strength (p = 0.06), perceived intravaginal pressure (p = 0.06), monthly frequency (p = 0.58), duration (p = 0.31), or age at onset (p = 0.05). Shaft-dominant masturbation was more frequent in the >3-min group (55.4 vs 31.4%; p < 0.001) and full-length less frequent (32.4 vs 49.7%; p < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age and BMI, each 10-mmHg increase in G-I was associated with higher odds of sIELT >3 min (adjusted OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.44; p < 0.001), and shaft-dominant masturbation was associated with higher odds of sIELT >3 min than full-length masturbation (adjusted OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.77-4.30; p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the main findings; conclusions remain regression-based.

手淫握力和感知到的阴道内压差与自我估计的阴道内射精潜伏期有关:一项回顾性研究。
尽管自慰很常见,但自慰相关行为与自我估计的阴道内射精潜伏期(sIELT)之间的关系尚未得到研究。这项单中心回顾性研究调查了470名男性临床参与者(2020年1月至2022年3月)sIELT与手淫参数之间的关系。sIELT被分为≤3和≤3分钟(n = 322和148)。手淫握力和感知阴道内压力用血压袖带量化(mmHg,平均3次试验);推导出它们的微分(G-I)。手的位置被预先设定为P1-P2 (glen -dominant)、P3-P5 (shaft-dominant)或P1-P5(全长)。初步分析采用多变量logistic回归,调整年龄和体重指数(BMI);探索性敏感性分析报告在补充附录中。与≤3分钟组相比,>3分钟组的G-I(中位数5.5 vs 0 mmHg; p - 3分钟组(55.4 vs 31.4%); p - 3分钟(调整OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.44; p - 3分钟)高于全长自慰组(调整OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.77-4.30
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Impotence Research
International Journal of Impotence Research 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
19.20%
发文量
140
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Impotence Research: The Journal of Sexual Medicine addresses sexual medicine for both genders as an interdisciplinary field. This includes basic science researchers, urologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, internists, neurologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, radiologists and other health care clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书