Changes in Microbial Foodborne Pathogen Detection in Beijing, China, Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Single-Center Retrospective Study.

IF 2.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Chao Liang, Luping Tan, Hongyi Zhang
{"title":"Changes in Microbial Foodborne Pathogen Detection in Beijing, China, Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Single-Center Retrospective Study.","authors":"Chao Liang, Luping Tan, Hongyi Zhang","doi":"10.2196/96940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Foodborne diseases remain a significant global public health concern, imposing substantial health and economic burdens. The COVID-19 pandemic altered health care-seeking behaviors, infection control practices, and infectious disease epidemiology; however, its association with microbial foodborne pathogens remains incompletely characterized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This single-center retrospective study aimed to analyze changes in bacterial and viral foodborne pathogen detection using clinical and etiological data from patients at an infectious diarrhea clinic in a tertiary Beijing hospital over 6 years and to inform prevention strategies in the postpandemic era.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data from patients presenting to the Infectious Diarrhea Clinic of Peking University Third Hospital (a grade A tertiary care center serving the Haidian District and surrounding areas of Beijing) from January 2018 to December 2019 (prepandemic) and from January 2022 to December 2023 (postpandemic). The years 2020 and 2021 were excluded due to major disruptions in clinical services and surveillance during the peak pandemic period. Etiological results were obtained from the Beijing Haidian District Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Diagnostic methods, laboratory protocols, specimen collection procedures, reagent kits, instrumentation, and testing criteria remained consistent throughout the study period. Cases were divided into 2 groups based on time period, and <i>χ</i>2 tests were used for comparisons. The positivity rate was calculated as patients with at least 1 target pathogen detected divided by all patients who provided stool specimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1064 patients were included (561 in group A and 503 in group B). From 2018 to 2019, 155/561 specimens tested positive for foodborne pathogens (27.6%, 95% CI 23.9%-31.3%), including 22 <i>Salmonella</i>, 24 <i>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</i>, 66 diarrheagenic <i>Escherichia coli</i> (DEC), and 43 <i>Norovirus</i> cases. From 2022 to 2023, 82/503 specimens tested positive (16.3%, 95% CI 13.1%-19.5%), including 13 <i>Salmonella</i>, 7 <i>V parahaemolyticus</i>, 45 DEC, and 17 <i>Norovirus</i> cases. The overall positivity rate was significantly lower in the postpandemic period than in the prepandemic period (27.6% vs 16.3%, <i>P</i><.05). Students and males aged 16-25 years were the most represented demographic groups. DEC remained the predominant pathogen in both periods. The detection rates of <i>V parahaemolyticus</i>, from 24/561 (4.3%) to 7/503 (1.4%) (<i>P</i>=.005), and <i>Norovirus</i>, from 43/561 (7.7%) to 17/503 (3.4%) (<i>P</i>=.002), were significantly lower in the postpandemic period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients attending a single infectious diarrhea clinic in Beijing, the detection rates of microbial foodborne pathogens were significantly lower in the postpandemic period compared with the prepandemic period. These findings may reflect changes in health care-seeking behavior, infection control practices, food consumption patterns, and/or testing practices during this period; however, this observational study cannot establish causation. Targeted surveillance and health education for students and young adults remain important. These results may not be generalizable to community-level incidence or other settings; further multicenter studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e96940"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13592739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/96940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Foodborne diseases remain a significant global public health concern, imposing substantial health and economic burdens. The COVID-19 pandemic altered health care-seeking behaviors, infection control practices, and infectious disease epidemiology; however, its association with microbial foodborne pathogens remains incompletely characterized.

Objective: This single-center retrospective study aimed to analyze changes in bacterial and viral foodborne pathogen detection using clinical and etiological data from patients at an infectious diarrhea clinic in a tertiary Beijing hospital over 6 years and to inform prevention strategies in the postpandemic era.

Methods: We collected data from patients presenting to the Infectious Diarrhea Clinic of Peking University Third Hospital (a grade A tertiary care center serving the Haidian District and surrounding areas of Beijing) from January 2018 to December 2019 (prepandemic) and from January 2022 to December 2023 (postpandemic). The years 2020 and 2021 were excluded due to major disruptions in clinical services and surveillance during the peak pandemic period. Etiological results were obtained from the Beijing Haidian District Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Diagnostic methods, laboratory protocols, specimen collection procedures, reagent kits, instrumentation, and testing criteria remained consistent throughout the study period. Cases were divided into 2 groups based on time period, and χ2 tests were used for comparisons. The positivity rate was calculated as patients with at least 1 target pathogen detected divided by all patients who provided stool specimens.

Results: In total, 1064 patients were included (561 in group A and 503 in group B). From 2018 to 2019, 155/561 specimens tested positive for foodborne pathogens (27.6%, 95% CI 23.9%-31.3%), including 22 Salmonella, 24 Vibrio parahaemolyticus, 66 diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC), and 43 Norovirus cases. From 2022 to 2023, 82/503 specimens tested positive (16.3%, 95% CI 13.1%-19.5%), including 13 Salmonella, 7 V parahaemolyticus, 45 DEC, and 17 Norovirus cases. The overall positivity rate was significantly lower in the postpandemic period than in the prepandemic period (27.6% vs 16.3%, P<.05). Students and males aged 16-25 years were the most represented demographic groups. DEC remained the predominant pathogen in both periods. The detection rates of V parahaemolyticus, from 24/561 (4.3%) to 7/503 (1.4%) (P=.005), and Norovirus, from 43/561 (7.7%) to 17/503 (3.4%) (P=.002), were significantly lower in the postpandemic period.

Conclusions: Among patients attending a single infectious diarrhea clinic in Beijing, the detection rates of microbial foodborne pathogens were significantly lower in the postpandemic period compared with the prepandemic period. These findings may reflect changes in health care-seeking behavior, infection control practices, food consumption patterns, and/or testing practices during this period; however, this observational study cannot establish causation. Targeted surveillance and health education for students and young adults remain important. These results may not be generalizable to community-level incidence or other settings; further multicenter studies are warranted.

北京地区2019冠状病毒病疫情前后食源性微生物病原体检测变化:单中心回顾性研究
背景:食源性疾病仍然是一个重大的全球公共卫生问题,造成巨大的健康和经济负担。COVID-19大流行改变了求医行为、感染控制做法和传染病流行病学;然而,其与微生物食源性病原体的关系仍不完全清楚。目的:本单中心回顾性研究旨在利用北京某三级医院感染性腹泻门诊患者6年来的临床和病因学资料,分析细菌和病毒性食源性病原体检测的变化,并为大流行后时代的预防策略提供信息。方法:我们收集了2018年1月至2019年12月(大流行前)和2022年1月至2023年12月(大流行后)在北京大学第三医院(北京海淀区及周边地区的三级甲等医疗中心)感染性腹泻门诊就诊的患者数据。由于在大流行高峰期临床服务和监测受到严重干扰,2020年和2021年被排除在外。病原学结果由北京市海淀区疾病预防控制中心提供。诊断方法、实验室方案、标本采集程序、试剂盒、仪器和检测标准在整个研究期间保持一致。病例按时间分为两组,采用χ2检验进行比较。阳性率计算为检出至少1种目标病原体的患者除以所有提供粪便标本的患者。结果:共纳入1064例患者(A组561例,B组503例)。2018年至2019年,155/561份标本食源性病原体检测呈阳性(27.6%,95% CI 23.9%-31.3%),包括22例沙门氏菌、24例副溶血性弧菌、66例致泻性大肠杆菌和43例诺如病毒。2022 - 2023年,共有82/503例标本检测呈阳性(16.3%,95% CI 13.1% ~ 19.5%),其中沙门氏菌13例,副溶血性V病毒7例,DEC 45例,诺如病毒17例。大流行后总体阳性率(27.6% vs 16.3%)显著低于大流行前,副溶血性PV病毒阳性率从24/561(4.3%)降至7/503 (1.4%)(P= 0.005),诺如病毒阳性率从43/561(7.7%)降至17/503 (3.4%)(P= 0.002)显著低于大流行后。结论:在北京市某传染性腹泻门诊就诊的患者中,大流行后的食源性微生物致病菌检出率明显低于大流行前。这些发现可能反映了这一时期求医行为、感染控制做法、食物消费模式和/或检测做法的变化;然而,这项观察性研究不能确定因果关系。对学生和年轻人进行有针对性的监测和健康教育仍然很重要。这些结果可能无法推广到社区水平的发病率或其他情况;进一步的多中心研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书