Prognostic impact of NLR, PLR, MLR, and SII in gastric cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Pub Date : 2026-09-21 DOI:10.1159/000551598
Cheng-Hsi Yeh, Shih-Ho Wang
{"title":"Prognostic impact of NLR, PLR, MLR, and SII in gastric cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Cheng-Hsi Yeh, Shih-Ho Wang","doi":"10.1159/000551598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer remains a significant global health burden, with immune checkpoint inhibitors showing variable effectiveness in treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the prognostic significance of hematologic inflammatory indices in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases through August 2023, focusing on neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). Our analysis included eighteen studies encompassing 2,061 patients with advanced gastric cancer undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. The meta-analysis demonstrated that elevated pretreatment inflammatory indices were consistently associated with worse clinical outcomes. High NLR showed significant associations with poor overall survival (adjusted HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.38-2.17) and progression-free survival (adjusted HR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.30-3.58). Similarly, elevated PLR correlated with worse overall survival (adjusted HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.38-2.25) and progression-free survival (adjusted HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.22-1.99). High MLR and SII also demonstrated significant associations with poorer overall survival outcomes. Higher pretreatment NLR, PLR, MLR, and SII were associated with poorer survival in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, suggesting a potential role for these simple blood-based indices in risk stratification that warrants confirmation in prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gastric cancer remains a significant global health burden, with immune checkpoint inhibitors showing variable effectiveness in treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the prognostic significance of hematologic inflammatory indices in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases through August 2023, focusing on neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). Our analysis included eighteen studies encompassing 2,061 patients with advanced gastric cancer undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. The meta-analysis demonstrated that elevated pretreatment inflammatory indices were consistently associated with worse clinical outcomes. High NLR showed significant associations with poor overall survival (adjusted HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.38-2.17) and progression-free survival (adjusted HR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.30-3.58). Similarly, elevated PLR correlated with worse overall survival (adjusted HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.38-2.25) and progression-free survival (adjusted HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.22-1.99). High MLR and SII also demonstrated significant associations with poorer overall survival outcomes. Higher pretreatment NLR, PLR, MLR, and SII were associated with poorer survival in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, suggesting a potential role for these simple blood-based indices in risk stratification that warrants confirmation in prospective studies.

NLR、PLR、MLR和SII对接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的胃癌患者预后的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
胃癌仍然是一个重要的全球健康负担,免疫检查点抑制剂在治疗结果中显示出不同的有效性。本系统综述和荟萃分析探讨了接受免疫检查点抑制剂的晚期胃癌患者血液学炎症指标的预后意义。截至2023年8月,我们对PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane CENTRAL数据库进行了全面检索,重点关注中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比率(MLR)和全身免疫炎症指数(SII)。我们的分析包括18项研究,包括2061例接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的晚期胃癌患者。荟萃分析表明,预处理炎症指数升高始终与较差的临床结果相关。高NLR与较差的总生存期(调整后的HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.38-2.17)和无进展生存期(调整后的HR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.30-3.58)有显著关联。同样,升高的PLR与较差的总生存期(调整后的HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.38-2.25)和无进展生存期(调整后的HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.22-1.99)相关。高MLR和SII也显示出与较差的总生存结果显著相关。在接受免疫检查点抑制剂的晚期胃癌患者中,较高的预处理NLR、PLR、MLR和SII与较差的生存率相关,这表明这些简单的基于血液的指标在风险分层中的潜在作用值得在前瞻性研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书