Clinical Implementation and Performance of Real-Time AI System for Device Tracking in Neurointervention: First U.S. Evaluation of Neuro-Vascular Assist.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
João Victor Sanders, Joshua Jimenez, Marion Oliver, Kenichi Kono, Krishna C Joshi, Demetrius Lopes
{"title":"Clinical Implementation and Performance of Real-Time AI System for Device Tracking in Neurointervention: First U.S. Evaluation of Neuro-Vascular Assist.","authors":"João Victor Sanders, Joshua Jimenez, Marion Oliver, Kenichi Kono, Krishna C Joshi, Demetrius Lopes","doi":"10.1007/s00062-026-01723-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the first U.S.-based implementation, notification accuracy, and temporal operator response of Neuro-Vascular Assist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-center study, 21 consecutive neurointerventional cases were performed using the AI system integrated with a biplane angiographic system. Procedures were classified as \"Standard\", \"Coil\", \"Filter\", or \"Venous\". Neuro-Vascular Assist tracked devices including guidewires, stents, coils, and filters in real-time. Visual and audio notifications were made based on device entry and exit in a determined region of interest. We classified these notifications as true positives (TP), false positives (FP), and false negatives (FN), and further assessed for temporal operator response (TOR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI system was successfully integrated into the workflow without procedural delays or system failures affecting notification delivery. A total of 232 TPs, 13 FPs, and 17 FNs were recorded, resulting in an overall precision of 94.7% and recall of 93.2%. Among the 59 TP notifications evaluated for TOR, 25 (42.4%) were followed by an observable operator response within 10 s. These 25 positive TOR events represented 10.2% of all 245 notifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neuro-Vascular Assist was successfully implemented and demonstrated preliminary accuracy and feasibility in a U.S.-based neurointerventional setting. Larger prospective studies are warranted to determine whether real-time AI-assisted device tracking influences procedural decision-making, workflow, safety, or clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10391,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-026-01723-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the first U.S.-based implementation, notification accuracy, and temporal operator response of Neuro-Vascular Assist.

Methods: In a single-center study, 21 consecutive neurointerventional cases were performed using the AI system integrated with a biplane angiographic system. Procedures were classified as "Standard", "Coil", "Filter", or "Venous". Neuro-Vascular Assist tracked devices including guidewires, stents, coils, and filters in real-time. Visual and audio notifications were made based on device entry and exit in a determined region of interest. We classified these notifications as true positives (TP), false positives (FP), and false negatives (FN), and further assessed for temporal operator response (TOR).

Results: The AI system was successfully integrated into the workflow without procedural delays or system failures affecting notification delivery. A total of 232 TPs, 13 FPs, and 17 FNs were recorded, resulting in an overall precision of 94.7% and recall of 93.2%. Among the 59 TP notifications evaluated for TOR, 25 (42.4%) were followed by an observable operator response within 10 s. These 25 positive TOR events represented 10.2% of all 245 notifications.

Conclusion: Neuro-Vascular Assist was successfully implemented and demonstrated preliminary accuracy and feasibility in a U.S.-based neurointerventional setting. Larger prospective studies are warranted to determine whether real-time AI-assisted device tracking influences procedural decision-making, workflow, safety, or clinical outcomes.

神经干预中设备跟踪实时人工智能系统的临床实施和性能:美国首次评估神经血管辅助。
目的:评估神经血管辅助系统在美国的首次实施、通知准确性和操作者的时间反应。方法:在单中心研究中,使用人工智能系统与双翼血管造影系统集成,连续进行21例神经介入治疗。手术分为“标准”、“线圈”、“过滤”和“静脉”。神经血管辅助跟踪设备,包括导丝,支架,线圈和过滤器的实时。视觉和音频通知是基于设备进入和退出一个确定的感兴趣的区域。我们将这些通知分类为真阳性(TP)、假阳性(FP)和假阴性(FN),并进一步评估时间操作员反应(TOR)。结果:AI系统成功集成到工作流程中,没有程序延迟或影响通知传递的系统故障。共记录tp 232个,fp 13个,FNs 17个,总体准确率为94.7%,召回率为93.2%。在为TOR评估的59个TP通知中,25个(42.4%)在10 s内得到了可观察到的操作员响应。这25起TOR阳性事件占所有245起通报的10.2%。结论:神经血管辅助在美国的神经介入环境中成功实施,并证明了初步的准确性和可行性。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来确定实时人工智能辅助设备跟踪是否会影响程序决策、工作流程、安全性或临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书