Patient treatment engagement scale (PTES) for inflammatory bowel disease: exploring background factors.

IF 1.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Hisao Toyoshima, Chiharu Yashima, Tomohide Akase, Masayoshi Koinuma
{"title":"Patient treatment engagement scale (PTES) for inflammatory bowel disease: exploring background factors.","authors":"Hisao Toyoshima, Chiharu Yashima, Tomohide Akase, Masayoshi Koinuma","doi":"10.1186/s13104-026-07664-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Patient Treatment Engagement Scale (PTES) is a simplified tool for assessing patient involvement in treatment decision-making, which is an important element of patient-centered care. Shared Decision Making (SDM) is the standard measure in this field; however, it is time-consuming and often difficult for non-physician healthcare professionals to apply in routine practice. Therefore, in this study we adopted PTES as a more pragmatic alternative and exploratively analyzed factors associated with PTES scores among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual patient data were collected via a web-based questionnaire. Items potentially associated with PTES, based on previous studies, were screened, and multicollinearity was assessed using Kendall's τ. A multiple regression model was constructed using the ordinary least squares method, and standardized β values and variance inflation factor (VIF) values were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed separately for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), and cross-validation was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main factors associated with PTES scores were the number of treatment options (β = 0.191), presence of complications (β = 0.128), trust in the attending physician (β = 0.119), number of trusted healthcare professionals (β = 0.099), and availability of supportive communities (β = 0.068). The number of treatment options had a particularly strong influence on UC patients, whereas the number of trusted healthcare professionals had a greater impact on CD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providing multiple treatment options and building trust with healthcare providers are crucial factors associated with higher PTES scores, reflecting greater patient engagement in treatment decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13595684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-026-07664-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Patient Treatment Engagement Scale (PTES) is a simplified tool for assessing patient involvement in treatment decision-making, which is an important element of patient-centered care. Shared Decision Making (SDM) is the standard measure in this field; however, it is time-consuming and often difficult for non-physician healthcare professionals to apply in routine practice. Therefore, in this study we adopted PTES as a more pragmatic alternative and exploratively analyzed factors associated with PTES scores among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Methods: Individual patient data were collected via a web-based questionnaire. Items potentially associated with PTES, based on previous studies, were screened, and multicollinearity was assessed using Kendall's τ. A multiple regression model was constructed using the ordinary least squares method, and standardized β values and variance inflation factor (VIF) values were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed separately for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), and cross-validation was conducted.

Results: The main factors associated with PTES scores were the number of treatment options (β = 0.191), presence of complications (β = 0.128), trust in the attending physician (β = 0.119), number of trusted healthcare professionals (β = 0.099), and availability of supportive communities (β = 0.068). The number of treatment options had a particularly strong influence on UC patients, whereas the number of trusted healthcare professionals had a greater impact on CD patients.

Conclusions: Providing multiple treatment options and building trust with healthcare providers are crucial factors associated with higher PTES scores, reflecting greater patient engagement in treatment decision-making.

炎症性肠病患者治疗参与量表(PTES):探索背景因素
背景:患者治疗参与量表(PTES)是评估患者参与治疗决策的简化工具,是以患者为中心的护理的重要组成部分。共享决策(SDM)是这一领域的标准措施;然而,对于非医师医疗保健专业人员来说,在日常实践中应用它是费时且往往困难的。因此,在本研究中,我们采用PTES作为更实用的替代方案,并探索性分析炎症性肠病(IBD)患者PTES评分的相关因素。方法:通过网络问卷收集患者个人资料。根据以往的研究,筛选可能与PTES相关的项目,并使用Kendall τ评估多重共线性。采用普通最小二乘法建立多元回归模型,计算标准化β值和方差膨胀因子(VIF)值。分别对溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD)进行亚组分析,并进行交叉验证。结果:与PTES评分相关的主要因素是治疗方案的数量(β = 0.191)、并发症的出现(β = 0.128)、对主治医师的信任(β = 0.119)、可信任的卫生保健专业人员的数量(β = 0.099)和支持性社区的可用性(β = 0.068)。治疗方案的数量对UC患者有特别强烈的影响,而值得信赖的医疗保健专业人员的数量对CD患者有更大的影响。结论:提供多种治疗选择和与医疗保健提供者建立信任是PTES评分较高的关键因素,反映了患者在治疗决策中的参与度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书