{"title":"Patient treatment engagement scale (PTES) for inflammatory bowel disease: exploring background factors.","authors":"Hisao Toyoshima, Chiharu Yashima, Tomohide Akase, Masayoshi Koinuma","doi":"10.1186/s13104-026-07664-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Patient Treatment Engagement Scale (PTES) is a simplified tool for assessing patient involvement in treatment decision-making, which is an important element of patient-centered care. Shared Decision Making (SDM) is the standard measure in this field; however, it is time-consuming and often difficult for non-physician healthcare professionals to apply in routine practice. Therefore, in this study we adopted PTES as a more pragmatic alternative and exploratively analyzed factors associated with PTES scores among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual patient data were collected via a web-based questionnaire. Items potentially associated with PTES, based on previous studies, were screened, and multicollinearity was assessed using Kendall's τ. A multiple regression model was constructed using the ordinary least squares method, and standardized β values and variance inflation factor (VIF) values were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed separately for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), and cross-validation was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main factors associated with PTES scores were the number of treatment options (β = 0.191), presence of complications (β = 0.128), trust in the attending physician (β = 0.119), number of trusted healthcare professionals (β = 0.099), and availability of supportive communities (β = 0.068). The number of treatment options had a particularly strong influence on UC patients, whereas the number of trusted healthcare professionals had a greater impact on CD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providing multiple treatment options and building trust with healthcare providers are crucial factors associated with higher PTES scores, reflecting greater patient engagement in treatment decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13595684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-026-07664-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Patient Treatment Engagement Scale (PTES) is a simplified tool for assessing patient involvement in treatment decision-making, which is an important element of patient-centered care. Shared Decision Making (SDM) is the standard measure in this field; however, it is time-consuming and often difficult for non-physician healthcare professionals to apply in routine practice. Therefore, in this study we adopted PTES as a more pragmatic alternative and exploratively analyzed factors associated with PTES scores among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Methods: Individual patient data were collected via a web-based questionnaire. Items potentially associated with PTES, based on previous studies, were screened, and multicollinearity was assessed using Kendall's τ. A multiple regression model was constructed using the ordinary least squares method, and standardized β values and variance inflation factor (VIF) values were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed separately for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), and cross-validation was conducted.
Results: The main factors associated with PTES scores were the number of treatment options (β = 0.191), presence of complications (β = 0.128), trust in the attending physician (β = 0.119), number of trusted healthcare professionals (β = 0.099), and availability of supportive communities (β = 0.068). The number of treatment options had a particularly strong influence on UC patients, whereas the number of trusted healthcare professionals had a greater impact on CD patients.
Conclusions: Providing multiple treatment options and building trust with healthcare providers are crucial factors associated with higher PTES scores, reflecting greater patient engagement in treatment decision-making.
BMC Research NotesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍:
BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.