Effectiveness and safety of screening colonoscopy in adults aged 75 years and older: a retrospective cohort study from Korea.

IF 3.4 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Clinical Endoscopy Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-18 DOI:10.5946/ce.2026.020
Juyoung Lee, Mina Kim, Gwang Hyo Yim, Hyeong Ho Jo, Joong Goo Kwon, Eun Young Kim, June Hwa Bae
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of screening colonoscopy in adults aged 75 years and older: a retrospective cohort study from Korea.","authors":"Juyoung Lee, Mina Kim, Gwang Hyo Yim, Hyeong Ho Jo, Joong Goo Kwon, Eun Young Kim, June Hwa Bae","doi":"10.5946/ce.2026.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of screening colonoscopy in older adults remains controversial because of procedural risks and limited life expectancy. We evaluated the diagnostic yield, procedural success, and safety of screening colonoscopy in patients aged ≥75 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 602 patients aged ≥75 years who underwent screening colonoscopy between January 2013 and December 2024. Patients were stratified into two age groups: 75-79 years (n=486) and ≥80 years (n=116). Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes, and safety were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The detection rates were 10.5%, 6.8%, and 0.9% for non-advanced adenoma, advanced adenoma, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Cecal intubation success was high in both groups (98.1% vs. 99.1%, p=0.454), and adequate bowel preparation rates were similar (71.2% vs. 72.4%, p=0.880). Sedation was used less frequently in patients aged ≥80 years (65.5% vs. 76.7%, p=0.013). Complications were rare (1.5%) and comparable between groups, with only mild events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Screening colonoscopy in adults aged ≥75 years demonstrated high procedural success, substantial neoplasia detection rates, and low adverse event rates, with comparable outcomes in patients aged ≥80 years. However, overall clinical benefit should be interpreted cautiously, particularly in those aged ≥80 years, supporting an individualized approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":10351,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":"843-850"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13624761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2026.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The role of screening colonoscopy in older adults remains controversial because of procedural risks and limited life expectancy. We evaluated the diagnostic yield, procedural success, and safety of screening colonoscopy in patients aged ≥75 years.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 602 patients aged ≥75 years who underwent screening colonoscopy between January 2013 and December 2024. Patients were stratified into two age groups: 75-79 years (n=486) and ≥80 years (n=116). Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes, and safety were compared.

Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The detection rates were 10.5%, 6.8%, and 0.9% for non-advanced adenoma, advanced adenoma, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Cecal intubation success was high in both groups (98.1% vs. 99.1%, p=0.454), and adequate bowel preparation rates were similar (71.2% vs. 72.4%, p=0.880). Sedation was used less frequently in patients aged ≥80 years (65.5% vs. 76.7%, p=0.013). Complications were rare (1.5%) and comparable between groups, with only mild events.

Conclusions: Screening colonoscopy in adults aged ≥75 years demonstrated high procedural success, substantial neoplasia detection rates, and low adverse event rates, with comparable outcomes in patients aged ≥80 years. However, overall clinical benefit should be interpreted cautiously, particularly in those aged ≥80 years, supporting an individualized approach.

75岁及以上成人结肠镜筛查的有效性和安全性:一项来自韩国的回顾性队列研究
背景/目的:由于程序风险和有限的预期寿命,结肠镜筛查在老年人中的作用仍然存在争议。我们评估了年龄≥75岁患者结肠镜筛查的诊断率、手术成功率和安全性。方法:我们回顾性分析了2013年1月至2024年12月期间602例年龄≥75岁的结肠镜筛查患者。患者分为两个年龄组:75-79岁(n=486)和≥80岁(n=116)。比较基线特征、手术结果和安全性。结果:两组间基线特征具有可比性。非晚期腺瘤、晚期腺瘤和结直肠癌的检出率分别为10.5%、6.8%和0.9%。两组盲肠插管成功率均较高(98.1%比99.1%,p=0.454),肠道准备率相似(71.2%比72.4%,p=0.880)。年龄≥80岁的患者使用镇静的频率较低(65.5%比76.7%,p=0.013)。并发症很少见(1.5%),两组间具有可比性,仅发生轻微事件。结论:≥75岁成人结肠镜筛查的手术成功率高,肿瘤检出率高,不良事件发生率低,与≥80岁患者的结果相当。然而,总体临床获益应谨慎解释,特别是在年龄≥80岁的患者中,支持个体化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Endoscopy
Clinical Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书