Feasibility and acceptability of the Unified Protocol for anxiety and depression in Pakistan: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Asma Nisa, Salma Siddiqui, Amantia A Ametaj
{"title":"Feasibility and acceptability of the Unified Protocol for anxiety and depression in Pakistan: a pilot randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Asma Nisa, Salma Siddiqui, Amantia A Ametaj","doi":"10.1186/s12888-026-08345-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to evidence-based psychological treatments for common mental health disorders remains limited in low-resource settings. This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the Urdu Adapted Unified Protocol (UA-UP), a transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral intervention for anxiety and depression, in Pakistan, and explored preliminary clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>51 adults meeting diagnostic criteria for anxiety and/or depressive disorders were randomized to a 14-week UA-UP intervention (n=25) or a waitlist control (n=26). Feasibility was assessed through recruitment, retention, and adherence rates. Acceptability was evaluated via session attendance, homework completion, participant satisfaction (CSQ-8), and qualitative feedback. Clinical outcomes (anxiety, depression, emotion regulation, and functional impairment) were assessed using validated measures. Between-group differences were analyzed using repeated-measures general linear models, and 95% confidence intervals were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility indicators were high, with recruitment (85.7%), retention (82.4%), and strong session adherence. Acceptability was supported by 79% homework completion and high satisfaction (mean CSQ-8=29.65, SD=2.60). Participants in the UA-UP group demonstrated greater improvements in anxiety, depression, and functional impairment compared to the control group, with large effect size estimates (e.g., anxiety g=1.18; depression g=1.15). Qualitative findings indicated enhanced emotional awareness, improved coping, and strong engagement with culturally adapted content.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The UA-UP demonstrated high feasibility and acceptability as a culturally adapted transdiagnostic CBT intervention in Pakistan. These findings support the conduct of a fully powered randomized controlled trial to evaluate clinical effectiveness and inform scalable implementation in low-resource settings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06002087. Registered 03 August 2023 (retrospectively registered). https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06002087?term=Asma%20Nisa&rank=1 .</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13595706/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-026-08345-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Access to evidence-based psychological treatments for common mental health disorders remains limited in low-resource settings. This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the Urdu Adapted Unified Protocol (UA-UP), a transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral intervention for anxiety and depression, in Pakistan, and explored preliminary clinical outcomes.

Methods: 51 adults meeting diagnostic criteria for anxiety and/or depressive disorders were randomized to a 14-week UA-UP intervention (n=25) or a waitlist control (n=26). Feasibility was assessed through recruitment, retention, and adherence rates. Acceptability was evaluated via session attendance, homework completion, participant satisfaction (CSQ-8), and qualitative feedback. Clinical outcomes (anxiety, depression, emotion regulation, and functional impairment) were assessed using validated measures. Between-group differences were analyzed using repeated-measures general linear models, and 95% confidence intervals were reported.

Results: Feasibility indicators were high, with recruitment (85.7%), retention (82.4%), and strong session adherence. Acceptability was supported by 79% homework completion and high satisfaction (mean CSQ-8=29.65, SD=2.60). Participants in the UA-UP group demonstrated greater improvements in anxiety, depression, and functional impairment compared to the control group, with large effect size estimates (e.g., anxiety g=1.18; depression g=1.15). Qualitative findings indicated enhanced emotional awareness, improved coping, and strong engagement with culturally adapted content.

Conclusions: The UA-UP demonstrated high feasibility and acceptability as a culturally adapted transdiagnostic CBT intervention in Pakistan. These findings support the conduct of a fully powered randomized controlled trial to evaluate clinical effectiveness and inform scalable implementation in low-resource settings.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06002087. Registered 03 August 2023 (retrospectively registered). https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06002087?term=Asma%20Nisa&rank=1 .

巴基斯坦焦虑和抑郁统一方案的可行性和可接受性:一项随机对照试验。
背景:在低资源环境中,对常见精神健康障碍的循证心理治疗仍然有限。本随机对照试验评估了巴基斯坦乌尔都适应统一方案(UA-UP)的可行性和可接受性,这是一种针对焦虑和抑郁的跨诊断认知行为干预,并探讨了初步临床结果。方法:51名符合焦虑和/或抑郁症诊断标准的成年人被随机分为为期14周的UA-UP干预组(n=25)和候补组(n=26)。可行性通过招募、留任和依从率进行评估。可接受性通过出席会议、完成作业、参与者满意度(CSQ-8)和定性反馈来评估。临床结果(焦虑、抑郁、情绪调节和功能障碍)采用有效的测量方法进行评估。使用重复测量一般线性模型分析组间差异,并报告95%置信区间。结果:可行性指标高,招募率为85.7%,保留率为82.4%,疗程依从性强。家庭作业完成率为79%,满意度较高(CSQ-8平均值=29.65,SD=2.60)。与对照组相比,UA-UP组的参与者在焦虑、抑郁和功能障碍方面表现出更大的改善,效应量估计较大(例如,焦虑g=1.18;抑郁g=1.15)。定性研究结果表明,情绪意识增强,应对能力提高,对文化适应内容的参与程度提高。结论:在巴基斯坦,UA-UP作为一种文化适应性的跨诊断CBT干预具有很高的可行性和可接受性。这些发现支持进行一项全功率随机对照试验,以评估临床有效性,并为在低资源环境下可扩展的实施提供信息。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06002087。注册于2023年8月3日(追溯注册)。https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06002087?term=Asma%20Nisa&rank=1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书