Risk factors for catheter-related infections in neck tumor patients undergoing chemotherapy through peripherally inserted central catheters.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2026-08-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.62347/NPWO2015
Ying Wu, Liandai Chen, Jinai He, Guohua Huang, Yutong Li
{"title":"Risk factors for catheter-related infections in neck tumor patients undergoing chemotherapy through peripherally inserted central catheters.","authors":"Ying Wu, Liandai Chen, Jinai He, Guohua Huang, Yutong Li","doi":"10.62347/NPWO2015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the risk factors for catheter-related infections (CRI) in patients undergoing chemotherapy through tunneled peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) following neck tumor lymph node dissection. To provide evidence for clinical intervention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records from 495 patients who underwent tunneled PICC placement for chemotherapy after neck tumor lymph node dissection. Patients were divided into a CRI group (n=55) and a non-CRI group (n=440). The incidence of CRI, infection type, and pathogen distribution were statistically analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify independent risk factors. A logistic regression-based predictive model was established and its performance was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 495 patients, the incidence of CRI was 11.11% (55/495), with exit-site infections being the predominant type (25 cases, 45.45%). A total of 11 pathogenic strains were isolated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that PICC indwelling duration >30 days, catheter displacement, concomitant diabetes mellitus, and white blood cell count ≤3.0×10<sup>9</sup>/L were independent risk factors for CRI (all P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for the logistic regression model for predicting CRI efficacy was 0.896 [95% CI, 0.845, 0.947], with a sensitivity of 91.0% and a specificity of 79.0%. Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement with the ideal predictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergoing chemotherapy through tunneled PICC after neck tumor lymph node dissection exhibit a relatively high incidence of CRI. Clinicians should implement targeted interventions for patients with prolonged catheterization, catheter displacement, diabetes mellitus, and leukopenia to reduce the incidence of CRI and improve patient outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"18 8","pages":"6580-6590"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13590791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/NPWO2015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the risk factors for catheter-related infections (CRI) in patients undergoing chemotherapy through tunneled peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) following neck tumor lymph node dissection. To provide evidence for clinical intervention strategies.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records from 495 patients who underwent tunneled PICC placement for chemotherapy after neck tumor lymph node dissection. Patients were divided into a CRI group (n=55) and a non-CRI group (n=440). The incidence of CRI, infection type, and pathogen distribution were statistically analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify independent risk factors. A logistic regression-based predictive model was established and its performance was evaluated.

Results: Among the 495 patients, the incidence of CRI was 11.11% (55/495), with exit-site infections being the predominant type (25 cases, 45.45%). A total of 11 pathogenic strains were isolated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that PICC indwelling duration >30 days, catheter displacement, concomitant diabetes mellitus, and white blood cell count ≤3.0×109/L were independent risk factors for CRI (all P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for the logistic regression model for predicting CRI efficacy was 0.896 [95% CI, 0.845, 0.947], with a sensitivity of 91.0% and a specificity of 79.0%. Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement with the ideal predictions.

Conclusions: Patients undergoing chemotherapy through tunneled PICC after neck tumor lymph node dissection exhibit a relatively high incidence of CRI. Clinicians should implement targeted interventions for patients with prolonged catheterization, catheter displacement, diabetes mellitus, and leukopenia to reduce the incidence of CRI and improve patient outcome.

颈部肿瘤患者经外周中心置管化疗时导管相关感染的危险因素
目的:探讨颈部肿瘤淋巴结清扫术后经隧道外周中心导管(PICCs)化疗患者导管相关性感染(CRI)的危险因素。为临床干预策略提供依据。方法:回顾性分析495例颈部肿瘤淋巴结清扫后行PICC隧道置入术化疗的病例资料。患者分为CRI组(n=55)和非CRI组(n=440)。统计分析CRI的发生率、感染类型及病原菌分布。采用多因素logistic回归确定独立危险因素。建立了基于logistic回归的预测模型,并对其性能进行了评价。结果:495例患者中CRI发生率为11.11%(55/495),以出口部位感染为主(25例,45.45%)。共分离到病原菌株11株。多因素logistic回归分析显示,PICC留置时间bb0 ~ 30d、导管移位、合并糖尿病、白细胞计数≤3.0×109/L是发生CRI的独立危险因素(均为p)。结论:颈部肿瘤淋巴结清扫后经PICC隧道化化疗的患者CRI发生率较高。临床医生应针对置管时间延长、导管移位、糖尿病、白细胞减少等患者实施针对性干预,以降低CRI发生率,改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书