Amniotic-Umbilical-to-Cerebral Ratio (AUCR) as a diagnostic tool for predicting adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
L. M. Müller, K. Oelmeier, R. Schmitz, M. Möllers, K. Oberste, D. Willy
{"title":"Amniotic-Umbilical-to-Cerebral Ratio (AUCR) as a diagnostic tool for predicting adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia","authors":"L. M. Müller,&nbsp;K. Oelmeier,&nbsp;R. Schmitz,&nbsp;M. Möllers,&nbsp;K. Oberste,&nbsp;D. Willy","doi":"10.1007/s00404-026-08531-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare the ability of different Doppler parameters in predicting composite adverse perinatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia. We especially aimed to analyse a possible future role of novel Doppler ratios, such as the Amniotic-Umbilical-to-Cerebral Ratio (AUCR), in a high-risk cohort, such as women suffering from preeclampsia.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study was conducted, analysing data from 151 pregnant women, consisting of 54 with preeclampsia and 97 healthy controls. Various Doppler parameters, including umbilical artery Doppler, middle cerebral artery, as well as computed ratios, such as the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and AUCR, were evaluated for their predictive value regarding composite adverse perinatal outcomes (CAPOs). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of each parameter, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Our results showed that AUCR was the strongest predictor of composite adverse perinatal outcomes among women with preeclampsia. In comparison, AUCR showed low predictive accuracy in the low-risk cohort of healthy controls. The AUC ROC values for each Doppler parameter were calculated, with AUCR yielding an AUC value of 0.87, indicating good predictive performance.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study suggests that AUCR is a valuable tool for predicting composite adverse perinatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia. The findings of this investigation may lead to further studies on AUCR, but require prospective validation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"313 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13593676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-026-08531-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the ability of different Doppler parameters in predicting composite adverse perinatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia. We especially aimed to analyse a possible future role of novel Doppler ratios, such as the Amniotic-Umbilical-to-Cerebral Ratio (AUCR), in a high-risk cohort, such as women suffering from preeclampsia.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, analysing data from 151 pregnant women, consisting of 54 with preeclampsia and 97 healthy controls. Various Doppler parameters, including umbilical artery Doppler, middle cerebral artery, as well as computed ratios, such as the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and AUCR, were evaluated for their predictive value regarding composite adverse perinatal outcomes (CAPOs). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of each parameter, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

Results

Our results showed that AUCR was the strongest predictor of composite adverse perinatal outcomes among women with preeclampsia. In comparison, AUCR showed low predictive accuracy in the low-risk cohort of healthy controls. The AUC ROC values for each Doppler parameter were calculated, with AUCR yielding an AUC value of 0.87, indicating good predictive performance.

Conclusion

This study suggests that AUCR is a valuable tool for predicting composite adverse perinatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia. The findings of this investigation may lead to further studies on AUCR, but require prospective validation.

羊膜-脐带-脑比(AUCR)作为预测妊娠合并先兆子痫不良围产期结局的诊断工具。
目的:比较不同多普勒参数预测子痫前期围产儿综合不良结局的能力。我们特别旨在分析新型多普勒比值(如羊膜-脐带-脑比值(AUCR))在高风险队列(如患有先兆子痫的妇女)中可能的未来作用。方法:采用回顾性队列研究,分析151例孕妇的资料,其中54例为先兆子痫,97例为健康对照。各种多普勒参数,包括脐动脉多普勒,大脑中动脉,以及计算比率,如脑胎盘比(CPR)和AUCR,评估其对复合不良围产期结局(CAPOs)的预测价值。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估各参数的诊断准确性,并计算曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:我们的结果显示,在子痫前期妇女中,AUCR是综合不良围产期结局的最强预测因子。相比之下,AUCR在健康对照的低风险队列中显示出较低的预测准确性。计算各多普勒参数的AUC ROC值,aur的AUC值为0.87,表明预测性能良好。结论:本研究提示AUCR是预测子痫前期妇女综合不良围产期结局的有价值的工具。这项研究的结果可能会导致对AUCR的进一步研究,但需要前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书