Darbepoetin alfa is more effective than epoetin-β in suppressing hepcidin and improving iron utilization in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2026-08-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.62347/ZTJE6136
Jinfeng Tan, Huimin Yan, Xin Li, Yong Chen
{"title":"Darbepoetin alfa is more effective than epoetin-β in suppressing hepcidin and improving iron utilization in maintenance hemodialysis patients.","authors":"Jinfeng Tan, Huimin Yan, Xin Li, Yong Chen","doi":"10.62347/ZTJE6136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the dynamics of serum hepcidin and iron metabolism markers in maintenance hemodialysis patients treated with reconstituted human Erythropoietin-β (EPO-β) and darbepoetin alfa (DA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included 105 patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Of these, 64 were in the EPO-β group (administered 2-3 times weekly) and 41 in the DA group (administered once every two weeks). Serum hepcidin, ferritin, transferrin saturation (TSAT), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), serum iron and hemoglobin (Hb) were measured at baseline, at week 8 and at week 12. A correlation analysis was performed. For the repeated measures analysis of variance comparing multiple time points (baseline, week 8 and week 12) between the two groups, Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used to perform pairwise comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum hepcidin decreased continuously in both groups during the 12-week treatment duration. At week 12, the DA group exhibited significantly lower hepcidin levels compared with EPO-β group. The Δhepcidin from baseline to week 12 was significantly greater in the DA group. The DA group also showed significant improvements in iron metabolism markers, with a greater decrease in TSAT, and a greater increase in serum iron compared to the EPO-β group. The erythropoiesis-stimulating agents resistance index (ERI) was significantly lower in the DA group than in the EPO-β group. LnΔhepcidin showed a positive correlation with LnΔFerritin, LnΔTSAT, LnΔSerum iron, and LnΔHb. The rates of adverse events were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to EPO-β, DA more effectively suppresses hepcidin, improves iron metabolism markers, and achieves higher erythropoietic efficiency, with comparable Hb response rates and safety profiles between the two groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"18 8","pages":"6782-6790"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13590678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/ZTJE6136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the dynamics of serum hepcidin and iron metabolism markers in maintenance hemodialysis patients treated with reconstituted human Erythropoietin-β (EPO-β) and darbepoetin alfa (DA).

Methods: This retrospective observational study included 105 patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Of these, 64 were in the EPO-β group (administered 2-3 times weekly) and 41 in the DA group (administered once every two weeks). Serum hepcidin, ferritin, transferrin saturation (TSAT), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), serum iron and hemoglobin (Hb) were measured at baseline, at week 8 and at week 12. A correlation analysis was performed. For the repeated measures analysis of variance comparing multiple time points (baseline, week 8 and week 12) between the two groups, Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used to perform pairwise comparisons.

Results: Serum hepcidin decreased continuously in both groups during the 12-week treatment duration. At week 12, the DA group exhibited significantly lower hepcidin levels compared with EPO-β group. The Δhepcidin from baseline to week 12 was significantly greater in the DA group. The DA group also showed significant improvements in iron metabolism markers, with a greater decrease in TSAT, and a greater increase in serum iron compared to the EPO-β group. The erythropoiesis-stimulating agents resistance index (ERI) was significantly lower in the DA group than in the EPO-β group. LnΔhepcidin showed a positive correlation with LnΔFerritin, LnΔTSAT, LnΔSerum iron, and LnΔHb. The rates of adverse events were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion: Compared to EPO-β, DA more effectively suppresses hepcidin, improves iron metabolism markers, and achieves higher erythropoietic efficiency, with comparable Hb response rates and safety profiles between the two groups.

达贝泊汀α在抑制维持性血液透析患者hepcidin和改善铁利用率方面比依贝泊汀β更有效。
目的:比较重建型人促红细胞生成素-β (EPO-β)和达贝生成素- α (DA)治疗的维护性血液透析患者血清hepcidin和铁代谢指标的变化。方法:回顾性观察研究纳入105例维持性血液透析患者。其中,EPO-β组64例(每周给药2-3次),DA组41例(每两周给药一次)。在基线、第8周和第12周分别测定血清hepcidin、铁蛋白、转铁蛋白饱和度(TSAT)、高敏c反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、血清铁和血红蛋白(Hb)。进行相关分析。对于两组间多个时间点(基线、第8周和第12周)的重复测量方差分析,采用Bonferroni事后检验进行两两比较。结果:两组患者在12周治疗期间血清hepcidin均持续下降。在第12周,与EPO-β组相比,DA组hepcidin水平显著降低。从基线到第12周,DA组的Δhepcidin显著增加。与EPO-β组相比,DA组铁代谢指标也有显著改善,TSAT下降幅度更大,血清铁含量增加幅度更大。DA组红细胞促红细胞生成素耐药指数(ERI)明显低于EPO-β组。LnΔhepcidin与LnΔFerritin、LnΔTSAT、LnΔSerum铁、LnΔHb呈正相关。两组的不良事件发生率具有可比性。结论:与EPO-β相比,DA更有效地抑制hepcidin,改善铁代谢标志物,实现更高的红细胞生成效率,两组Hb反应率和安全性相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书