Botulinum Toxin Type A for Postoperative Scar Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Yi-Hsin Ho, Te-Wei Chang, Chun-Wei Hsu, Yi-Yun Ho, Chih-Chiang Chen, Ching-Po Lin
{"title":"Botulinum Toxin Type A for Postoperative Scar Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Yi-Hsin Ho, Te-Wei Chang, Chun-Wei Hsu, Yi-Yun Ho, Chih-Chiang Chen, Ching-Po Lin","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjag204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative scars may impair quality of life. Prophylactic botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) may reduce scarring, but optimal timing, dose density, injection plane, and anatomic indications remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated prophylactic BoNT-A for postoperative scar prevention and examined effect modification by timing, dose density, and anatomic site; injection-plane practices were summarized descriptively. Four databases were searched through January 2026 for comparative trials of perioperative or postoperative BoNT-A administration. Random-effects meta-analysis used standardized mean differences (SMDs); subgroup analyses and meta-regression examined timing, dose density, and anatomic site. Seventeen studies (656 treatment sites; 456 participants) were included. BoNT-A improved clinician composite scores (SMD, -0.864; 95% CI, -1.137 to -0.591; low certainty), clinician VAS (SMD, -0.951; 95% CI, -1.468 to -0.434; very low certainty), and objective scar width (SMD, -0.924; 95% CI, -1.119 to -0.728; moderate certainty). Exploratory pooled analyses using the original study-level timing assignments suggested a larger effect with delayed injection (SMD, -1.240; moderate certainty) than with immediate injection (SMD, -0.559; low certainty). Timing and anatomic site jointly accounted for 81% of heterogeneity (P = .0008), with effects largest in chest and smallest in fine facial sites. Moderate-certainty evidence supports reduced objective scar width; clinician composite scales improved with low certainty. Pooled clinician-composite analyses suggested larger effects with delayed injection, although direct within-site timing studies have reported conflicting findings. Immediate-injection evidence and patient-reported outcomes remain uncertain, and cross-study dose escalation within 4-10 U/cm was not associated with additional benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postoperative scars may impair quality of life. Prophylactic botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) may reduce scarring, but optimal timing, dose density, injection plane, and anatomic indications remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated prophylactic BoNT-A for postoperative scar prevention and examined effect modification by timing, dose density, and anatomic site; injection-plane practices were summarized descriptively. Four databases were searched through January 2026 for comparative trials of perioperative or postoperative BoNT-A administration. Random-effects meta-analysis used standardized mean differences (SMDs); subgroup analyses and meta-regression examined timing, dose density, and anatomic site. Seventeen studies (656 treatment sites; 456 participants) were included. BoNT-A improved clinician composite scores (SMD, -0.864; 95% CI, -1.137 to -0.591; low certainty), clinician VAS (SMD, -0.951; 95% CI, -1.468 to -0.434; very low certainty), and objective scar width (SMD, -0.924; 95% CI, -1.119 to -0.728; moderate certainty). Exploratory pooled analyses using the original study-level timing assignments suggested a larger effect with delayed injection (SMD, -1.240; moderate certainty) than with immediate injection (SMD, -0.559; low certainty). Timing and anatomic site jointly accounted for 81% of heterogeneity (P = .0008), with effects largest in chest and smallest in fine facial sites. Moderate-certainty evidence supports reduced objective scar width; clinician composite scales improved with low certainty. Pooled clinician-composite analyses suggested larger effects with delayed injection, although direct within-site timing studies have reported conflicting findings. Immediate-injection evidence and patient-reported outcomes remain uncertain, and cross-study dose escalation within 4-10 U/cm was not associated with additional benefit.

A型肉毒毒素用于术后疤痕预防:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
术后疤痕可能影响生活质量。预防性A型肉毒毒素(BoNT-A)可以减少疤痕,但最佳时间、剂量密度、注射平面和解剖适应症仍不确定。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了预防性BoNT-A对术后瘢痕预防的作用,并通过时间、剂量密度和解剖部位检查了效果的改变;对注入平面的实践进行了描述性的总结。到2026年1月,我们检索了四个数据库,以进行围手术期或术后BoNT-A给药的比较试验。随机效应荟萃分析采用标准化平均差异(SMDs);亚组分析和meta回归检查了时间、剂量密度和解剖部位。纳入17项研究(656个治疗点,456名受试者)。BoNT-A改善了临床医生的综合评分(SMD, -0.864; 95% CI, -1.137至-0.591;低确定性),临床医生的VAS (SMD, -0.951; 95% CI, -1.468至-0.434;极低确定性)和客观疤痕宽度(SMD, -0.924; 95% CI, -1.119至-0.728;中等确定性)。使用原始研究水平时间分配的探索性合并分析表明,延迟注射(SMD, -1.240,中等确定性)比立即注射(SMD, -0.559,低确定性)的效果更大。时间和解剖部位共同占异质性的81% (P = 0.0008),胸部影响最大,面部精细部位影响最小。中等确定性证据支持减少客观疤痕宽度;临床医师综合量表改善,但确定性较低。临床综合分析表明延迟注射的效果更大,尽管直接的现场时间研究报告了相互矛盾的结果。立即注射的证据和患者报告的结果仍然不确定,4-10 U/cm的交叉研究剂量递增与额外的益处无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书