{"title":"Botulinum Toxin Type A for Postoperative Scar Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Yi-Hsin Ho, Te-Wei Chang, Chun-Wei Hsu, Yi-Yun Ho, Chih-Chiang Chen, Ching-Po Lin","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjag204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative scars may impair quality of life. Prophylactic botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) may reduce scarring, but optimal timing, dose density, injection plane, and anatomic indications remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated prophylactic BoNT-A for postoperative scar prevention and examined effect modification by timing, dose density, and anatomic site; injection-plane practices were summarized descriptively. Four databases were searched through January 2026 for comparative trials of perioperative or postoperative BoNT-A administration. Random-effects meta-analysis used standardized mean differences (SMDs); subgroup analyses and meta-regression examined timing, dose density, and anatomic site. Seventeen studies (656 treatment sites; 456 participants) were included. BoNT-A improved clinician composite scores (SMD, -0.864; 95% CI, -1.137 to -0.591; low certainty), clinician VAS (SMD, -0.951; 95% CI, -1.468 to -0.434; very low certainty), and objective scar width (SMD, -0.924; 95% CI, -1.119 to -0.728; moderate certainty). Exploratory pooled analyses using the original study-level timing assignments suggested a larger effect with delayed injection (SMD, -1.240; moderate certainty) than with immediate injection (SMD, -0.559; low certainty). Timing and anatomic site jointly accounted for 81% of heterogeneity (P = .0008), with effects largest in chest and smallest in fine facial sites. Moderate-certainty evidence supports reduced objective scar width; clinician composite scales improved with low certainty. Pooled clinician-composite analyses suggested larger effects with delayed injection, although direct within-site timing studies have reported conflicting findings. Immediate-injection evidence and patient-reported outcomes remain uncertain, and cross-study dose escalation within 4-10 U/cm was not associated with additional benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Postoperative scars may impair quality of life. Prophylactic botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) may reduce scarring, but optimal timing, dose density, injection plane, and anatomic indications remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated prophylactic BoNT-A for postoperative scar prevention and examined effect modification by timing, dose density, and anatomic site; injection-plane practices were summarized descriptively. Four databases were searched through January 2026 for comparative trials of perioperative or postoperative BoNT-A administration. Random-effects meta-analysis used standardized mean differences (SMDs); subgroup analyses and meta-regression examined timing, dose density, and anatomic site. Seventeen studies (656 treatment sites; 456 participants) were included. BoNT-A improved clinician composite scores (SMD, -0.864; 95% CI, -1.137 to -0.591; low certainty), clinician VAS (SMD, -0.951; 95% CI, -1.468 to -0.434; very low certainty), and objective scar width (SMD, -0.924; 95% CI, -1.119 to -0.728; moderate certainty). Exploratory pooled analyses using the original study-level timing assignments suggested a larger effect with delayed injection (SMD, -1.240; moderate certainty) than with immediate injection (SMD, -0.559; low certainty). Timing and anatomic site jointly accounted for 81% of heterogeneity (P = .0008), with effects largest in chest and smallest in fine facial sites. Moderate-certainty evidence supports reduced objective scar width; clinician composite scales improved with low certainty. Pooled clinician-composite analyses suggested larger effects with delayed injection, although direct within-site timing studies have reported conflicting findings. Immediate-injection evidence and patient-reported outcomes remain uncertain, and cross-study dose escalation within 4-10 U/cm was not associated with additional benefit.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.