Association of dynamic changes in ASPECTS perfusion scores derived from dual-time-point multi-post-labeling delay arterial spin labeling with 90-day functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2026-08-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.62347/POFV6679
Danwen Wang, Qingqing Li, Yichang Li
{"title":"Association of dynamic changes in ASPECTS perfusion scores derived from dual-time-point multi-post-labeling delay arterial spin labeling with 90-day functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke.","authors":"Danwen Wang, Qingqing Li, Yichang Li","doi":"10.62347/POFV6679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether dynamic changes in Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) perfusion scores derived from dual-time-point multi-post-labeling delay arterial spin labeling (multi-PLD ASL) are associated with 90-day functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included 464 patients with anterior-circulation AIS who underwent multi-PLD ASL at baseline and approximately 1 week after onset. Cerebral blood flow (CBF)-ASPECTS, cerebral blood volume (CBV)-ASPECTS, arterial transit time (ATT)-ASPECTS, relative perfusion values, and infarct core volume (ICV) were compared between favorable (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) and unfavorable (mRS 3-6) outcome groups. Correlation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The favorable outcome group showed greater improvements in CBF-ASPECTS, CBV-ASPECTS, ATT-ASPECTS, relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF), and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), together with a greater reduction in relative arterial transit time (rATT). Increased ICV was more pronounced in the unfavorable outcome group. Dynamic ASL indicators were significantly correlated with 90-day mRS scores. Single indicators showed moderate discriminative ability, whereas combined models performed better. The clinical-imaging model showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.846.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short-term changes on dual-time-point multi-PLD ASL were associated with 90-day functional outcome in AIS. Dynamic ASPECTS perfusion scores may serve as an interpretable imaging supplement for prognosis assessment, but should be combined with clinical information.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"18 8","pages":"7092-7106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13590992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/POFV6679","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether dynamic changes in Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) perfusion scores derived from dual-time-point multi-post-labeling delay arterial spin labeling (multi-PLD ASL) are associated with 90-day functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 464 patients with anterior-circulation AIS who underwent multi-PLD ASL at baseline and approximately 1 week after onset. Cerebral blood flow (CBF)-ASPECTS, cerebral blood volume (CBV)-ASPECTS, arterial transit time (ATT)-ASPECTS, relative perfusion values, and infarct core volume (ICV) were compared between favorable (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) and unfavorable (mRS 3-6) outcome groups. Correlation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed.

Results: The favorable outcome group showed greater improvements in CBF-ASPECTS, CBV-ASPECTS, ATT-ASPECTS, relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF), and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), together with a greater reduction in relative arterial transit time (rATT). Increased ICV was more pronounced in the unfavorable outcome group. Dynamic ASL indicators were significantly correlated with 90-day mRS scores. Single indicators showed moderate discriminative ability, whereas combined models performed better. The clinical-imaging model showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.846.

Conclusion: Short-term changes on dual-time-point multi-PLD ASL were associated with 90-day functional outcome in AIS. Dynamic ASPECTS perfusion scores may serve as an interpretable imaging supplement for prognosis assessment, but should be combined with clinical information.

双时间点多重后标记延迟动脉自旋标记获得的ASPECTS灌注评分动态变化与急性缺血性卒中90天功能结局的关系
目的:探讨阿尔伯塔卒中计划早期CT评分(ASPECTS)灌注评分的动态变化是否与急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者90天功能结局相关。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了464例在基线和发病后约1周接受多pld ASL的前循环AIS患者。比较有利(改良Rankin量表[mRS] 0-2)和不利(mRS 3-6)结果组的脑血流量(CBF)-ASPECTS、脑血容量(CBV)-ASPECTS、动脉传递时间(ATT)-ASPECTS、相对灌注值和梗死核心体积(ICV)。进行相关分析和受试者工作特征(ROC)分析。结果:预后良好组在CBF-ASPECTS、CBV-ASPECTS、at - aspects、相对脑血流量(rCBF)、相对脑血容量(rCBV)、相对动脉传递时间(rATT)均有较大改善。ICV升高在不良结果组更为明显。动态ASL指标与90天mRS评分显著相关。单个指标的判别能力中等,而组合模型的判别能力较好。临床影像模型显示曲线下面积(AUC)最高,为0.846。结论:双时间点多pld ASL的短期变化与AIS患者90天功能预后相关。动态方面灌注评分可作为预后评估的可解释的影像学补充,但应与临床信息相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书