Carl D. Watson, Alfie J. Lem, Andrew Bissett, Christian Cando-Dumancela, Michael G. Gardner, Riley J. Hodgson, Craig Liddicoat, Shawn D. Peddle, Martin F. Breed
{"title":"Restoration Plantings Promote Functional Recovery of Soil Fungi","authors":"Carl D. Watson, Alfie J. Lem, Andrew Bissett, Christian Cando-Dumancela, Michael G. Gardner, Riley J. Hodgson, Craig Liddicoat, Shawn D. Peddle, Martin F. Breed","doi":"10.1111/mec.70552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The global scale of biodiversity loss and land degradation has prompted the establishment of ambitious international restoration agreements, with the goal of returning biodiverse and functional ecosystems. Restoration interventions are often vegetation focused, and while they yield positive, measurable outcomes, they do not always lead to whole ecosystem recovery. Although soil microbiota such as fungi are integral ecosystem components (e.g., as symbionts, decomposers and drivers of nutrient cycling), they are largely absent from restoration planning and monitoring. Therefore, how fungi respond to ecosystem restoration, especially over longer time scales, is largely unknown. Here, we show trends of reduced dominance of soil fungal pathotrophs across a restoration chronosequence 6 years after initial sampling. This decline in soil fungal pathotrophs is consistent with continued functional recovery, despite little evidence of additional whole-community fungal recovery. Fungal community composition was also strongly associated with soil properties, particularly phosphorus, consistent with persistent land-use legacies constraining further recovery. The observed change in fungal functional composition is consistent with previous studies reporting higher relative abundance of pathotrophic fungi in ecologically degraded sites. Our study provides valuable insights into how soil fungal communities respond to restoration plantings and highlights the importance of repeated sampling. Our findings also demonstrate the value of considering both taxonomic and functional indicators when assessing ecosystem recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":210,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology","volume":"35 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13594986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mec.70552","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The global scale of biodiversity loss and land degradation has prompted the establishment of ambitious international restoration agreements, with the goal of returning biodiverse and functional ecosystems. Restoration interventions are often vegetation focused, and while they yield positive, measurable outcomes, they do not always lead to whole ecosystem recovery. Although soil microbiota such as fungi are integral ecosystem components (e.g., as symbionts, decomposers and drivers of nutrient cycling), they are largely absent from restoration planning and monitoring. Therefore, how fungi respond to ecosystem restoration, especially over longer time scales, is largely unknown. Here, we show trends of reduced dominance of soil fungal pathotrophs across a restoration chronosequence 6 years after initial sampling. This decline in soil fungal pathotrophs is consistent with continued functional recovery, despite little evidence of additional whole-community fungal recovery. Fungal community composition was also strongly associated with soil properties, particularly phosphorus, consistent with persistent land-use legacies constraining further recovery. The observed change in fungal functional composition is consistent with previous studies reporting higher relative abundance of pathotrophic fungi in ecologically degraded sites. Our study provides valuable insights into how soil fungal communities respond to restoration plantings and highlights the importance of repeated sampling. Our findings also demonstrate the value of considering both taxonomic and functional indicators when assessing ecosystem recovery.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Ecology publishes papers that utilize molecular genetic techniques to address consequential questions in ecology, evolution, behaviour and conservation. Studies may employ neutral markers for inference about ecological and evolutionary processes or examine ecologically important genes and their products directly. We discourage papers that are primarily descriptive and are relevant only to the taxon being studied. Papers reporting on molecular marker development, molecular diagnostics, barcoding, or DNA taxonomy, or technical methods should be re-directed to our sister journal, Molecular Ecology Resources. Likewise, papers with a strongly applied focus should be submitted to Evolutionary Applications. Research areas of interest to Molecular Ecology include:
* population structure and phylogeography
* reproductive strategies
* relatedness and kin selection
* sex allocation
* population genetic theory
* analytical methods development
* conservation genetics
* speciation genetics
* microbial biodiversity
* evolutionary dynamics of QTLs
* ecological interactions
* molecular adaptation and environmental genomics
* impact of genetically modified organisms